Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Gateron Melodic
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Gateron Melodic switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Gateron Melodic offer distinct typing experiences. The Lotus V2 is a linear switch, known for its smooth keystrokes and consistent feel. On the other hand, the Melodic is a clicky switch that brings a satisfying tactile feedback with each key press. While the Lotus V2 is best for those who prefer a straightforward typing experience, the Melodic is perfect for users who enjoy the audible and tactile feedback of a clicky switch. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
60g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Gateron Melodic play a significant role in determining the sound profile of the switches. The Lotus V2 features a POM top housing that creates a deeper and more muted sound profile, while the Melodic utilizes a polycarbonate top housing that produces a sharper and crisper sound. This contrast in sound can greatly impact the overall typing experience, with the Lotus V2 providing a more subdued typing sound and the Melodic offering a more vibrant and higher-pitched sound. Additionally, the translucency of the polycarbonate top housing in the Melodic allows for enhanced RGB lighting effects, adding a visual element to the typing experience.
Moving on to the bottom housing of the switches, the Lotus V2's POM bottom housing delivers a similar pleasing and unique sound profile to its top housing. In contrast, the Melodic incorporates a nylon bottom housing that produces a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature. The choice of housing material for the bottom part of the switch can greatly affect the overall acoustics of typing, with the nylon bottom housing of the Melodic providing a more rounded and dulled sound compared to the POM bottom housing of the Lotus V2. These differences in sound can cater to individuals with varying preferences in typing sound and feel.
Overall, the combination of different housing materials in a switch can provide a unique typing experience. While the Lotus V2 and the Melodic may have contrasting top and bottom housing materials, they both offer distinct sound profiles that cater to different preferences. The impact of the housing material on the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, as well as on the sound when releasing a key, showcases how nuanced the typing experience can be based on the choice of materials. Whether opting for the deeper and more muted sound of POM in the Lotus V2 or the sharper and crisper sound of polycarbonate in the Melodic, individuals can select a switch that best suits their typing preferences.
Weight
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Gateron Melodic clicky switch, which has an unknown actuation force. However, the Gateron Melodic switch has a heavier bottom out force of 60 grams, while the bottom out force of the Lotus V2 is unavailable. This means that the Lotus V2 may feel lighter to type on initially, but the Melodic switch offers a more substantial typing experience when fully pressed down. For those who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing or gaming sessions, the Lotus V2 may be the preferred choice. On the other hand, those who enjoy a more pronounced and tactile typing feel may lean towards the Gateron Melodic switch. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on the individual's preference for actuation and bottom out force.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, while the Gateron Melodic clicky switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Melodic switch has a longer travel distance compared to the Lotus V2. The difference may seem small, but it can have an impact on the overall typing or gaming experience. The shorter travel distance of the Lotus V2 may appeal to those seeking faster response times, such as gamers, while the longer travel distance of the Melodic switch may offer a more satisfying tactile feedback for those who prefer a more substantial key press. Overall, whether you prefer a shorter or longer travel distance will depend on your personal preference and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The Gateron Melodic has an MSRP of $6.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Melodic for $6.00.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Lotus V2 linear switch doesn't have a specific reputation, while the Gateron Melodic clicky switch is known for its resonant and crunchy sound profile. Typing on the Melodic switch will result in a higher-pitched and clean clicky sound, providing an immersive auditory experience reminiscent of stepping on autumn leaves. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can be influenced by the keyboard itself and the keycaps used.
Moving on to feel, the Lotus V2 linear switch doesn't have a defined feel, whereas the Gateron Melodic clicky switch is described as buttery and invigorating. Typing on the Melodic switch will give you a smooth and fluid keystroke experience, offering a seamless and uniform typing sensation. Additionally, the Melodic switch provides pronounced feedback, a moderate to firm actuation force, and a snappy and reactive feel, all contributing to an immersive typing experience.
Taking all the available information into account, it's clear that the Gateron Melodic clicky switch offers a unique blend of a resonant and crunchy sound profile along with a buttery and invigorating typing feel. While the Lotus V2 linear switch may not have specific characteristics in sound and feel, opting for the Melodic switch will surely result in a satisfying and enjoyable typing experience, with a balance of sound and feel that caters to both auditory and tactile preferences. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches will come down to personal preference regarding the desired auditory and tactile feedback.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Gateron Melodic clicky switch, you should consider your preferences for typing experience. If you prioritize a smooth and frictionless keystroke with no bottom out force, the Lotus V2 would be an excellent choice. On the other hand, if you enjoy a medium bottom out force and crave a satisfying clicky sound with tactile feedback, the Melodic switch from Gateron would be more suitable for you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you value a silent linear switch or a clicky switch that provides an immersive auditory and tactile experience while typing. Choose wisely based on your personal preferences for sound and feel when using a mechanical keyboard.
Mentioned in this article
