Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Cherry MX Orange
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Cherry MX Orange switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Cherry MX Orange both offer linear switch experiences that cater to different user preferences. The Lotus V2 is celebrated for its smooth keystrokes and consistent performance, making it a fantastic choice for gamers and typists who seek a quieter and less tactile option while typing or gaming. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange, a reissue of the original MX Orange switches, combines the beloved characteristics of the earlier model with modern enhancements to deliver a responsive and reliable experience, ideal for those who appreciate a blend of smoothness and feedback. While both switches share the linear classification, the differences in their engineering and feel can significantly influence your typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and Cherry MX Orange switches, we see a divergence in manufacturing choice but a convergence in the resultant sound profile each switch produces. The Lotus V2 uses POM (Polyoxymethylene) for both its top and bottom housings, which is characterized by creating a unique and pleasing sound that tends to be deeper and more muted. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange features nylon for its top and bottom housings. Despite the material difference, nylon is known for producing a deeper, fuller sound due to its softer nature, which absorbs sound in a manner quite similar to POM. Thus, while the materials differ, both switches achieve a sound profile that is rich and subdued.
Delving further into the effects of these materials, the bottom housing's characteristics play a significant role in shaping the user experience. The Lotus V2's POM bottom housing contributes to the muted sound quality that results upon bottoming out, ultimately allowing for a quieter typing environment. Similarly, the nylon bottom housing of the Cherry MX Orange also achieves a deeper sound, offering a rounder auditory experience as a result of its softer properties, which tend to absorb sound better than harder plastics. Therefore, even with different materials, the impact on the acoustic profile when the keys are bottomed out is remarkably similar, rendering both switches suitable for users who prefer quiet yet full-sounding key presses.
Finally, when considering the top housing of each switch, we again see a resemblance in the auditory qualities produced despite the varying materials. The Lotus V2’s POM top housing contributes nuanced depth and warmth, while the nylon top housing of the MX Orange adds its own fullness but with a slightly different texture. Since the top housing is responsible for the sound upon key release, both switches offer a somewhat analogous experience post-keypress; both provide satisfying aural feedback while maintaining their unique material traits. In sum, despite the different compositions, both the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and Cherry MX Orange switches demonstrate how different materials can produce remarkably similar auditory outcomes, showcasing the versatility of design in achieving rich and pleasant sound profiles.
Weight
When comparing the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Cherry MX Orange linear switch, we find a notable difference in their actuation forces. The Lotus V2 has an actuation force of 45 grams, making it the lighter option, which can allow for more comfortable typing over extended periods—ideal for work or long gaming sessions. Conversely, the Cherry MX Orange requires a heavier actuation force of 55 grams, appealing to users who prefer a stronger, more substantial feel when typing. Both switches have an unknown bottom out force, meaning we cannot directly compare this aspect; however, due to their different actuation forces, typists may experience varying levels of resistance when bottoming out. Overall, the choice between these two switches hinges on individual preferences for actuation force, with the Lotus V2 being more suited for lightweight tactile feedback and the MX Orange offering a heavier response.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Cherry MX Orange linear switch, it is clear that they differ significantly. The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, while the Cherry MX Orange features a longer travel distance of 4.0 mm. This difference may impact user experience; those who prefer quicker response times and a more responsive feel might opt for the shorter 3.4 mm travel of the Lotus V2, while users who favor a more pronounced depth and tactile feedback may find the Cherry MX Orange's 4.0 mm travel more satisfactory. Thus, anyone seeking a blend of speed and subtlety should carefully consider these distinct offerings.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The Cherry MX Orange has an MSRP of $4.10 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Orange for $3.89.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch does not have a well-defined character, leaving its acoustic profile relatively unknown. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange linear switch offers a more familiar and refined sound, especially with the enhancements from the MX2A generation. While the MX Orange leans towards a more subdued acoustic experience, the Lotus V2 might produce a sound that varies as it hasn't been distinctly characterized. That said, it’s important to note that the actual sound you experience can be influenced by the specific keyboard construction and the type of keycaps used, so the differences may be less pronounced when these factors come into play.
Regarding feel, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 also remains vague, with its tactile feedback and smoothness not being explicitly highlighted. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange switch is generally recognized for its satisfying linear action that provides a consistent experience without any tactile bump, appealing to users who prefer a seamless keystroke. The MX Orange’s design, enhanced from its original form, likely offers a reliable and enjoyable typing experience, contrasting with the uncertain feedback from the Lotus V2, which does not offer any notable tactile or linear characteristics that suggest a standout experience.
In summary, while the Cherry MX Orange linear switch is recognized for its refinements and dependable feel enjoyed by many enthusiasts, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 lacks defined attributes regarding both sound and feel. Users seeking a known experience may gravitate toward the MX Orange for its established reputation, while those who are adventurous might explore the Lotus V2, albeit with the understanding that its qualities are less documented. Depending on your preferences and priorities in a mechanical switch, you can expect different experiences, with the MX Orange providing a more predictable outcome and the Lotus V2 offering a blank slate for potential discovery.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Cherry MX Orange linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing style. If you prioritize a smooth and undisturbed keystroke for both gaming and typing, the Lotus V2 may be the preferable option, especially if you're looking for a switch with a refined, modern feel that can accommodate fast-paced actions without hindrance. Conversely, if you prefer a tactile experience with robust build quality and the assurance of a classic design, the Cherry MX Orange switch may be more suitable for you, offering a dependable performance enriched by its historical lineage. Additionally, the sound profiles and overall feel can play a significant role in your choice; if you enjoy a quieter typing experience, lean towards the Lotus V2, while if you appreciate a slight audible feedback and well-balanced resistance, the MX Orange may appeal to you more. Assessing your specific needs, alongside the characteristics and enhancements of each switch, will guide you in choosing the switch that best enhances your mechanical keyboard experience.