United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Cherry MX Silent Red

An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Cherry MX Silent Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to compare and contrast are the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Cherry MX Silent Red. The Lotus V2 is a linear switch, known for its smooth and consistent keystrokes. On the other hand, the MX Silent Red, also a linear switch, offers a similar typing experience to the classic MX Red but with the added benefit of silent operation. While the Lotus V2 provides a traditional feel, the MX Silent Red caters to those who prefer a quieter typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Total travel

3.70 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

pom

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Cherry MX Silent Red switches both offer unique sound profiles, with the Lotus V2 utilizing POM for both top and bottom housings, while the MX Silent Red uses nylon for its top and bottom housings. POM is known for creating a deeper and more muted sound, whereas nylon elicits a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition. While both materials provide unique sound characteristics, the choice between POM and nylon ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of sound experience.

In terms of sound production, the POM top and bottom housing of the Lotus V2 will work together to create a deeper and more muted sound profile overall when typing on the keyboard. Similarly, the nylon top and bottom housing of the MX Silent Red will combine to provide a deeper and fuller sound experience. Both switches benefit from the sound-absorbing properties of their respective materials, resulting in a duller and rounder sound that is pleasing to the ear. While there may be slight differences in sound between the two switches, the overall typing experience is likely to be similar in terms of sound quality.

When considering the impact of the housing materials on the overall typing experience, it is important to note that the bottom housing will have a greater influence on the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing will affect the sound when releasing a key. This means that the POM bottom housing of the Lotus V2 will contribute to a deeper and more muted bottom-out sound, while the nylon bottom housing of the MX Silent Red will provide a deeper and fuller bottom-out sound. Ultimately, both switches offer unique sound profiles that cater to different preferences, making them both viable options for keyboard enthusiasts seeking a specific typing experience.

Weight

The actuation force of both the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Cherry MX Silent Red linear switch is the same at 45 grams. This means that users can expect a similar amount of force needed to register a keystroke on both switches. However, when it comes to bottom out force, both switches have their force listed as None grams, making it difficult to determine which switch requires more force to fully press down. In terms of weight, the absence of a bottom out force measurement can make it challenging to compare the overall feel of the switches. Some users may prefer the lighter actuation force of 45 grams for longer typing sessions or gaming, while others may prefer a heavier bottom out force for a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, without a clear measurement for bottom out force, it is hard to definitively compare the two switches in terms of force requirements.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Cherry MX Silent Red linear switch, we see that the Lotus V2 has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, while the MX Silent Red has a travel distance of 3.7 mm. This makes the Lotus V2 the shorter of the two switches. The shorter travel distance of the Lotus V2 may be preferred by gamers looking for faster response times, while the longer travel distance of the MX Silent Red may provide a more substantial feel when pressing down on the keys. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for travel distance and the type of typing or gaming experience desired.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.

The Cherry MX Silent Red has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Silent Red for $4.15.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Lotus V2 is known for producing a standard mechanical keyboard click, providing a satisfying auditory feedback with each keystroke. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Silent Red switch is specifically designed to reduce noise output, resulting in a muted and thocky sound profile that is much quieter than traditional mechanical switches. The MX Silent Red's low-pitched sound adds a bass-heavy and mellow tone to the typing experience, making it a great choice for those looking for a more discreet keyboard option.

In terms of feel, the Lotus V2 and Cherry MX Silent Red differ slightly. The Lotus V2's tactile feedback and actuation force provide a smooth and consistent typing experience with a satisfying keystroke feel. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Silent Red switch has a textured feel, offering a bit of noticeable friction when pressed. Some users may prefer this unique texture for added control and feedback during typing sessions.

Overall, the Lotus V2 and Cherry MX Silent Red switches offer different yet appealing qualities. The Lotus V2 provides a standard mechanical keyboard sound and smooth keystroke feel, while the Cherry MX Silent Red switch excels in providing a quiet and tactile typing experience with a textured feel. Depending on your preference for sound output and tactile feedback, both switches can deliver a satisfying typing experience. Ultimately, your choice between the two will depend on whether you prioritize a silent typing environment or prefer a more traditional mechanical keyboard sound and feel.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Cherry MX Silent Red linear switch, you should consider your priorities. If you prioritize a completely silent typing experience, the Cherry MX Silent Red switch would be the ideal choice for you as it maintains a slightly heavier feel compared to the MX Red but operates quietly. On the other hand, if you value a unique typing experience with characteristics that set it apart from traditional switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switch may be more appealing to you. Ultimately, the decision should be based on your preferences for sound and feel during typing sessions. Choose the switch that aligns best with your individual needs and preferences to enhance your overall typing experience.

Mentioned in this article