Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Outemu Black
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Outemu Black switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When looking at mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the Jerrzi Lotus V2, a linear switch, and the Outemu Black, also a linear switch. The Lotus V2 is best known for its smooth actuation and consistent feel, making it a popular choice for gamers and typists alike. On the other hand, the Outemu Black is praised for its durability and reliability, with a heavier actuation force that appeals to those who prefer a more tactile typing experience. Each switch has its own strengths and unique features that cater to different preferences and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
65g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
82g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.50 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Outemu Black both offer unique sound profiles based on their housing materials. The Lotus V2's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound, while the Black's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper and crisper sound. In terms of aesthetics, the use of translucent polycarbonate in the Black allows for RGB lighting to shine through, giving it a visually appealing look. On the other hand, the Lotus V2's POM bottom housing contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile, while the Black's nylon bottom housing absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound.
While the top and bottom housings of the Lotus V2 and the Black differ in material, they each play a significant role in the overall sound and feel of the switch. The POM top housing of the Lotus V2 impacts the sound when a key is released, creating a unique and pleasing sound profile, while the Black's polycarbonate top housing offers a sharper and higher-pitched sound on keypress. Conversely, the bottom housing of the Lotus V2 with POM material results in a deeper and more muted sound upon bottoming out, while the Black's nylon bottom housing absorbs more sound, resulting in a softer and rounder sound when typing.
In summary, the choice between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Outemu Black ultimately comes down to personal preference in sound and feel. The POM and polycarbonate materials offer distinct sound profiles, with the Lotus V2 providing a deeper and more muted sound, and the Black offering a sharper and crisper sound. Similarly, the bottom housings of the switches also contribute to the overall typing experience, with POM creating a fuller sound and nylon absorbing more sound for a rounder sound. Overall, both switches have their own strengths based on their housing materials, providing users with a variety of options to suit their preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Outemu Black linear switch, it is evident that there are significant differences between the two. The Lotus V2 has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams, making it easier to trigger keystrokes compared to the Black's heavier 65 grams. Additionally, the Lotus V2 does not disclose its bottom out force, making it difficult to determine how much force is needed to fully press the switch, whereas the Black has a substantial bottom out force of 82 grams. Those who prefer a lighter touch may find the Lotus V2 more appealing for extended typing or gaming sessions, while individuals who enjoy a stronger push for a more tactile typing experience may lean towards the heavier actuation and bottom out force of the Outemu Black switch. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preferences for typing feel and force requirements.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, making it the shorter option compared to the Outemu Black linear switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The Lotus V2 offers a slightly shallower experience, which may be preferred by gamers looking for quicker response times. On the other hand, the Outemu Black provides a deeper key press, which may be more satisfying for users who prefer a more substantial feel when typing. Both switches offer distinct advantages depending on personal preference, with the Lotus V2 catering to those seeking a shorter travel distance and the Outemu Black appealing to those who prefer a longer travel distance for typing comfort. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual typing preferences and the desired typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The Outemu Black comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Lotus V2 linear switch is often praised for its quiet operation, making it a good choice for those seeking a stealthy typing experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Black linear switch is known for its slightly louder sound profile, providing a more audible typing feedback. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by the keyboard build and keycaps used.
Moving on to feel, the Lotus V2 linear switch is appreciated for its smooth and consistent keystrokes, offering a satisfying typing experience with every keypress. Meanwhile, the Outemu Black linear switch is known for its slightly heavier actuation force, providing a more substantial feel when typing. The tactile feedback of a switch is a personal preference, so it's essential to try out different switches to find the one that suits your typing style.
In conclusion, both the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Outemu Black linear switch have their unique qualities when it comes to sound and feel. While the Lotus V2 excels in providing a quieter typing experience with smooth keystrokes, the Outemu Black offers a slightly louder sound profile and heavier actuation force for those who prefer a more tactile feel. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on your personal preferences and typing needs, but rest assured that you can achieve similar results in sound and feel with either switch based on the information provided.
Conclusion
To summarize, when deciding between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Outemu Black linear switch, consider the factors of bottom out force, key characteristics, sound, and feel. If you prefer a lighter touch and a smoother typing experience, the Lotus V2 with its none grams bottom out force may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a heavier key press and a more tactile feel, the Outemu Black with its 82 grams bottom out force might be more suitable for your typing style. Additionally, take into account the key characteristics, sound, and feel of each switch to ensure that you select the one that aligns with your preferences and typing needs. Ultimately, the decision between the Lotus V2 and the Black will depend on your individual preferences and requirements for a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
