Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Outemu Dustproof Green
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Outemu Dustproof Green switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch offer unique typing experiences for users. The Lotus V2 is best known for its smooth and consistent keystrokes, making it a popular choice for those who prefer a linear feel with no tactile bump or audible click. On the other hand, the Dustproof Green stands out for its satisfying click sound and tactile bump, providing users with a more tactile and audible typing experience. While the Lotus V2 is ideal for those seeking a quiet and smooth typing experience, the Dustproof Green is perfect for individuals who enjoy the tactile feedback and audible click of a mechanical keyboard. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
65g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
80g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.20 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Outemu Dustproof Green switches offer distinct sound profiles due to their different materials. The Lotus V2 features a POM top housing, which produces a deeper and more muted sound compared to the polycarbonate top housing of the Dustproof Green, known for creating a sharper and crisper sound. While POM is more subtle in its sound profile, polycarbonate delivers a more resonant and higher-pitched sound, making it a preferred choice for those looking for a brighter typing experience. Both materials offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences in sound.
In terms of the bottom housing, the Lotus V2 utilizes POM, which again results in a deeper and fuller sound profile, similar to its top housing. On the other hand, the Dustproof Green employs a nylon bottom housing, which absorbs more sound and creates a duller and rounder typing experience. This contrast in materials leads to differences in the overall sound and typing feel of the switches, appealing to users with varying preferences in sound and feedback. Each material brings its own unique characteristics to the table, offering a diverse range of options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
When considering the impact of housing materials on the overall typing experience, it's important to recognize that the qualities of the top and bottom housings play a significant role. While the bottom housing affects the bottom-out sound and feel of a key press, the top housing influences the sound when releasing a key. The combination of materials in the Lotus V2 and Dustproof Green switches highlights the importance of choosing housing materials that align with your desired sound profile and typing experience. Whether opting for the deeper and more muted sound of POM or the sharper and crisper sound of polycarbonate, both switches offer distinct qualities that cater to different preferences in mechanical keyboards.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch, it is clear that the Dustproof Green requires a heavier force for both actuation and bottom out compared to the Lotus V2. The actuation force of the Lotus V2 is 45 grams, while the Dustproof Green requires 65 grams. Additionally, the bottom out force of the Dustproof Green is 80 grams, whereas the bottom out force of the Lotus V2 is unknown. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Lotus V2 would be the better option, allowing for longer typing sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, those who prefer a more substantial typing feel may lean towards the Dustproof Green with its heavier actuation and bottom out force. Ultimately, the weight of the switch plays a significant role in determining the typing experience and comfort level for the user.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, making it a shorter travel distance compared to the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The Lotus V2 offers a quicker response time, which is favored by gamers looking for faster reactions. On the other hand, the Dustproof Green provides a slightly deeper key press, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial feel when typing. Both options offer different experiences in terms of travel distance, catering to individual preferences for typing or gaming.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The Outemu Dustproof Green comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is known for its quiet operation, making it a great choice for those who prefer a more subtle typing experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch is known for its audible click with each keystroke, providing a satisfying sound feedback to the typist. Depending on personal preference, the Lotus V2 would be ideal for a quiet work environment, while the Dustproof Green may be better suited for those who enjoy a more audible typing experience.
Moving on to feel, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is described as having a smooth and consistent keystroke, offering a seamless typing experience. In contrast, the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch is known for its tactile bump and audible click, providing a more pronounced tactile feedback with each press. The Lotus V2 would be favored by those who prefer a smoother typing experience, while the Dustproof Green would appeal to typists who enjoy a more tactile feel and audible feedback while typing.
In conclusion, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Lotus V2 provides a quiet and smooth typing experience, while the Dustproof Green delivers a loud and tactile typing experience. Depending on your personal preferences for typing sound and feel, you would be able to achieve similar results with both switches if those specific qualities are not a top priority for your choice in mechanical keyboard switches. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches would depend on the individual's preference for sound, feel, and overall typing experience.
Conclusion
In summary, when choosing between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch, you should consider your preference for actuation force and typing experience. If you prefer a switch with a light bottom out force and a smooth linear feel, the Lotus V2 would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a heavier bottom out force and a satisfying clicky sound with tactile feedback, the Dustproof Green switch would be more suitable for your needs. Ultimately, it all comes down to personal preference and what type of typing experience you are looking for in your mechanical keyboard.
Mentioned in this article
