United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. KTT Phalaenopsis

An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the KTT Phalaenopsis mechanical keyboard switches, there are distinct differences to consider. The Lotus V2 is a linear switch that offers a smooth and consistent typing experience, while the Phalaenopsis is a tactile switch that provides a satisfying feedback with each keystroke. The Lotus V2 is best known for its None categorization, making it a versatile choice for those who prefer a straightforward typing experience. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis stands out with its beautiful translucent design and a light actuation force of 37g, perfect for reducing finger fatigue during long typing sessions. With its 50g tactile force, the Phalaenopsis delivers a satisfying and discernible tactile bump that enhances the overall typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

37g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Box

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

22mm gold-plated spring

Housing materials

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the KTT Phalaenopsis both feature unique housing materials that contribute to their overall sound profiles. The Lotus V2's POM top and bottom housings create a deep and pleasing sound, with a more muted tone compared to the Phalaenopsis's polycarbonate housings. The Phalaenopsis's polycarbonate top and bottom housings, on the other hand, result in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This difference in housing materials leads to distinct sound experiences when typing on each keyboard.

While the Lotus V2 and the KTT Phalaenopsis both offer a unique sound experience due to their different housing materials, they also share some similarities. Both keyboards utilize clear housings to allow for RGB lighting effects, with the Lotus V2 featuring POM top and bottom housings and the Phalaenopsis using polycarbonate for both. This similarity in material choice for the housings allows for a consistent aesthetic appeal and functionality when it comes to showcasing RGB lighting effects.

It is important to note that the qualities of the housing materials in each keyboard will impact different aspects of the typing experience. The bottom housing material will have a more significant influence on the sound and feel when pressing down on a key, while the top housing material will affect the sound when releasing a key. This difference in impact highlights the importance of choosing the right housing material to achieve the desired sound profile and typing experience for each keyboard design.

Weight

When comparing the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch to the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, it is evident that the actuation force and bottom out force play a significant role in their performance. The Lotus V2 has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Phalaenopsis's 37 grams, making it require more pressure to trigger a keystroke. However, the bottom out force of the Lotus V2 is unknown, while the Phalaenopsis has a light 50-gram bottom out force. This suggests that the Lotus V2 might offer a smoother keystroke without a defined bottoming-out pressure, while the Phalaenopsis provides a more tactile typing experience with a clear bottoming-out force. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for typing feel and whether one prefers a lighter actuation force for extended typing sessions or a heavier force for a more substantial typing experience.

Travel distance

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm compared to the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, which has a longer travel distance of 4 mm. The Lotus V2 offers a quicker response time due to its shorter travel distance, making it a favorite among gamers. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis provides a more substantial depth when pressing down on the key due to its longer travel distance. Both switches cater to different preferences, with the Lotus V2 offering speed and the Phalaenopsis offering a more tactile feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and the desired typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.

The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

Regarding sound, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch does not have a specific reputation or descriptor provided. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch is known for offering a bassy and thocky sound profile during key presses. This means that the Phalaenopsis switch produces a deeper and richer sound with a lower frequency range, resembling the depth and richness associated with bass tones, as well as a satisfying deep "thud" or soft "knock" when the key is pressed and released. However, it is essential to note that the sound of a switch can be influenced by factors such as the keyboard's build and the keycaps used.

In terms of feel, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch does not have a specific description provided. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch is known for its stepped feel. This means that the Phalaenopsis switch has a two-stage tactile feedback, offering a more subtle sensation compared to switches with a single large bump, where you can feel some pre-travel and/or post-travel during the keystroke.

Overall, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch does not have specific qualities mentioned for sound or feel, whereas the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch is known for its bassy and thocky sound profile and stepped tactile feel. If we compare the two based on the available information, the Phalaenopsis switch seems to offer a more defined and tactile typing experience with a focus on sound depth and tactile feedback. Ultimately, the choice between these switches would depend on personal preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience.

Conclusion

To conclude, if you are looking for a smooth and consistent typing experience without the need for a bottom out force, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a tactile bump with a light actuation force for effortless typing and minimal finger fatigue, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch would be the better option. The Phalaenopsis switches also provide a satisfying and discernible tactile bump for a delightful typing experience. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches would depend on your personal preference for typing feel, sound profile, and actuation force. Choose the one that aligns best with your typing style and preferences.

Mentioned in this article