Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. HMX Poro
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the HMX Poro switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and HMX Poro stand out as two strong contenders in the realm of linear switches, each offering unique attributes for different user preferences. The Lotus V2 is renowned for its smooth keypress, providing a silky experience that many users appreciate, particularly those who favor quiet and distraction-free environments. On the other hand, the HMX Poro captivates with its remarkably lubricated design, ensuring not only an effortless glide but also a satisfyingly poppy and clacky sound profile thanks to its ultra-light actuation force. For those who enjoy a more expressive typing experience, the Poro may be the ideal choice, while the Lotus V2 appeals to those seeking simplicity and tranquility. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the HMX Poro switches demonstrate both similarities and distinct characteristics that shape their sound profiles and overall typing experiences. The Lotus V2 utilizes POM (Polyoxymethylene) for both its top and bottom housings, while the Poro switches feature nylon material for both housings. Both POM and nylon are recognized for their capacity to produce deeper and fuller sound profiles, albeit through different mechanisms. POM's harder structure contributes to a unique and pleasing sound that is somewhat muted, while nylon's softer composition absorbs more sound, resulting in a more rounded and duller acoustic experience. Together, these characteristics indicate that although the two switches use different materials, the overarching audio qualities can lead to similar listening experiences depending on the user's preferences.
When it comes to the impact of the top and bottom housings on sound and feel, the specifics of each material play a pivotal role. In the case of the Lotus V2, the consistent use of POM contributes to a cohesive sound output, with a muted tone that emphasizes the smoothness of typing and a minimalistic acoustic signature. Conversely, the HMX Poro's dual nylon housing will offer a sound that is not only fuller but also gentler, creating a different tactile feedback that users may appreciate. As pressing down on the switch primarily engages the bottom housing, the Poro will deliver a soft bottom-out sound that users may find comforting, whereas the Lotus V2 will retain a more distinct sound profile despite its deeper tone.
Ultimately, both switch models offer unique auditory experiences shaped by their respective materials, yet they may yield similar results concerning sound depth. While the Lotus V2 stands out for its pleasing muted nature derived from POM, the HMX Poro capitalizes on nylon's more absorbing properties to create a warmer sound. Users may find that, while the materials differ, the overall intent of deepening the sound profile remains consistent, providing satisfying acoustic performances that can cater to a variety of typing preferences. Whether one opts for the Lotus V2 or the HMX Poro, the decision ultimately depends on the subtle nuances each material contributes to the sound and feel of the switches.
Weight
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch both feature the same actuation force of 45 grams, which means they will provide similar results in terms of the force required to trigger a keystroke. However, a marked difference arises with their bottom out forces: the Poro has a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the Lotus V2's bottom out force is unavailable. This suggests that if you prefer a lighter experience, the Lotus V2 may be a better choice as it potentially offers a softer feel upon full depression, whereas the Poro, with its heavier bottom out force, may provide a more substantial tactile feedback for those who appreciate a firmer typing experience. Overall, the Lotus V2 is the lighter option, while the Poro is the heavier switch, making them suitable for different preferences in typing dynamics.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch, the Lotus V2 measures 3.4 mm, while the Poro has a slightly longer travel distance of 3.7 mm. This means that the Lotus V2 provides a more responsive feel, which may be favored by gamers and those who appreciate quicker keystrokes. On the other hand, the HMX Poro, with its longer travel distance, offers a more pronounced depth that some users may find satisfying and comfortable, especially for typing. Consequently, if you're looking for quicker response times, the Lotus V2 would be the preferable choice due to its shorter travel distance, whereas the Poro would be suitable for those who appreciate a more substantial keypress experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The HMX Poro has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Poro for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has an undisclosed sound profile, making it difficult to compare its acoustic qualities with the HMX Poro linear switch. The Poro, however, is well-regarded for its satisfyingly poppy and clacky sound, attributed to its ultra-light actuation force combined with meticulous lubrication. This lubrication enhances the acoustics, resulting in a pleasant auditory experience during typing. Since the sound of a switch can also be influenced by the keyboard plate and keycap material, the overall sound signature may vary based on your personal setup.
When it comes to the feel of each switch, again the specific characteristics of the Lotus V2 are not provided. However, the HMX Poro is celebrated for its silky smooth keystrokes, ensuring an effortless glide that enhances typing pleasure. This seamless feedback can lead to a more enjoyable typing experience, especially during extended sessions. Without knowledge of the Lotus V2's tactile qualities, a direct comparison is challenging, but if it shares similar attributes, users may find comparable typing satisfaction.
In conclusion, while the HMX Poro linear switch shines with its unique sound profile and smooth feel, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 lacks the disclosed characteristics that would allow for a thorough comparison. If the Lotus V2 eventually reveals similar qualities, users can expect a typing experience that echoes the satisfaction offered by the Poro. However, until further information is available on the Lotus V2's sound and feel, the Poro stands out as a clear favorite for those seeking a refined linear switch experience.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch, you should consider your personal preferences and intended usage. If you favor a smooth and light typing experience, the HMX Poro is an excellent choice, particularly for those who enjoy a delicately balanced sound profile that combines a satisfying pop with a clacky quality. The Poro’s 50-gram bottom-out force makes it suitable for both gaming and typing, allowing for a satisfying tactile feedback without requiring excessive force. On the other hand, if you're looking for a switch that provides an effortlessly smooth action, the Lotus V2 may be appealing, despite the lack of specifics about its sound and feel. The key takeaway is that if you prefer a more engaging auditory experience with an emphasis on satisfying keystrokes, the Poro should be your go-to. Conversely, if the particular qualities of the Lotus V2 pique your interest and align with your typing style, it could be the ideal fit for you. Ultimately, your choice should reflect how each switch complements your typing or gaming habits.
Mentioned in this article
