Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. SP-Star RedBlue
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the SP-Star RedBlue switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the SP-Star RedBlue both offer unique experiences for users. The Lotus V2 is a linear switch that is best known for its smooth keystrokes and consistent actuation force. On the other hand, the RedBlue linear switches are particularly suited for those who prefer a medium-light typing experience, with a low-pitched sound profile. While the Lotus V2 offers a more traditional linear switch experience, the RedBlue switches provide a slightly different typing sensation with their specific characteristics. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
57g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Gold plated
Housing materials
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 and SP-Star RedBlue both feature unique housing materials that contribute to their overall sound profiles. The Lotus V2 utilizes POM for both its top and bottom housings, creating a deeper and more muted sound. In contrast, the RedBlue uses polycarbonate for both its top and bottom housings, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. While both materials offer distinct sound characteristics, the choice between POM and polycarbonate ultimately depends on personal preference and the desired sound experience.
Despite their differences, the housing materials of the Lotus V2 and RedBlue both play a crucial role in determining the overall sound and feel of the switches. POM is known for creating a more pleasing and unique sound profile with deeper tones, while polycarbonate offers a sharper and more resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that utilize RGB lighting, adding a visual element to the auditory experience. Whether you prefer the richer sound of POM or the crisper sound of polycarbonate, both materials contribute to the overall performance of the switches in their own distinct ways.
When it comes to performance, the choice between POM and polycarbonate for housing materials can significantly impact the overall typing experience. The bottom housing material plays a crucial role in the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on a key, while the top housing material influences the sound when releasing a key. By understanding the differences in sound profiles and characteristics associated with POM and polycarbonate, keyboard enthusiasts can make an informed decision based on their individual preferences and typing style. Ultimately, both the Lotus V2 and RedBlue offer unique sound profiles that cater to different preferences, showcasing the importance of housing materials in the overall design of mechanical switches.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the SP-Star RedBlue linear switch, we can see that the Lotus V2 requires an actuation force of 45 grams, while the RedBlue's actuation force is unknown. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 has no specified bottom out force, while the RedBlue has a bottom out force of 57 grams, making it a medium-light switch. This means that the Lotus V2 is lighter in terms of actuation force, while the RedBlue is lighter when it comes to bottoming out. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Lotus V2, while those who prefer a bit more resistance might opt for the RedBlue. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, making it shorter than the SP-Star RedBlue linear switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. The Lotus V2 offers a faster response time, making it ideal for gamers who value quick reactions. On the other hand, the RedBlue switch provides a deeper feeling when pressed, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial keypress. Both options offer unique benefits based on personal preference, with the Lotus V2 being shorter and the RedBlue being longer in terms of travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual typing or gaming preferences.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The SP-Star RedBlue has an MSRP of $5.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the RedBlue for $5.40.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the SP-Star RedBlue linear switch offer different experiences. The Lotus V2's sound profile is yet to be determined, while the RedBlue switch is known for its low-pitched, neutral, and thocky sound characteristics. Low-pitched switches tend to have a more bass-heavy and mellow tone, while a neutral switch like the RedBlue offers a moderate actuation force and sound profile suitable for various uses. The thocky nature of the RedBlue switch provides a deep and satisfying sound when pressed. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors like the keyboard's construction and keycaps.
Moving on to feel, the Lotus V2's tactile experience has not been specified, while the RedBlue switch is described as mild and polished. A mild switch like the RedBlue offers a gentler typing experience compared to switches with more pronounced characteristics, making it approachable for most users. The polished finish of the RedBlue switch results in smooth and refined key travel, creating a sleek typing experience with reduced friction. This could be due to the materials used in the switch or factory lubrication, enhancing the overall feel of the switch.
In conclusion, while the sound profile and tactile feel of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and SP-Star RedBlue linear switches differ, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. If you are looking for a switch with a low-pitched and thocky sound profile, the RedBlue switch would be a great option. On the other hand, if you prefer a mild and polished typing experience, the RedBlue switch would also be a suitable choice. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches would depend on your personal preferences in terms of sound and feel.
Conclusion
In closing, if you are looking for a linear switch with a medium-light typing experience and a low-pitched sound profile, the SP-Star RedBlue linear switch would be the ideal choice for you. These switches are particularly suited for those who prefer a gentle typing experience in a safe, middle-ground zone. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with no bottom out force and are looking for a unique typing experience, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch would be the way to go. Ultimately, your decision between these two switches will come down to your personal preference in terms of typing experience and sound profile.
Mentioned in this article
