Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring offer unique typing experiences. The Lotus V2, a linear switch, is best known for its smooth and consistent keystrokes, making it ideal for those who prefer a straightforward typing feel. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Double Spring, a tactile switch, boasts a medium-high level of tactility with a two-staged spring that provides satisfying feedback with each press. Additionally, the Shadow switch variant produces deep, resonating thocks that enhance the typing experience. Both switches have their own set of characteristics that cater to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
63g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20mm dual-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring play a significant role in the overall sound profile of the switches. The Lotus V2 features a POM top housing, which creates a deeper and relatively muted sound profile. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Double Spring's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. This difference in sound can be attributed to the stiffness of polycarbonate, leading to a more clear and resonant sound compared to POM. Aesthetically, polycarbonate is ideal for switches with RGB lighting due to its translucency, while POM has its own unique appeal.
Similarly, the bottom housing materials of the Lotus V2 and Shadow (Ink) Double Spring also contribute to their distinct sound profiles. Both switches have a bottom housing made of either POM or polycarbonate, which affects the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the switch. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate lends itself to a crisper and more impactful sound and feel, while POM creates a deeper and more muted sensation. The choice of bottom housing material can greatly influence the overall typing experience and preference of users.
Overall, the differences in housing materials between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring result in contrasting sound profiles and typing experiences. While POM provides a unique and pleasing sound that is on the deeper side, polycarbonate delivers a sharper and higher-pitched sound with a more resonant feel. The translucency of polycarbonate is advantageous for switches with RGB lighting, adding an aesthetic element to the sound experience. Depending on individual preferences for sound and feel, each housing material offers distinct qualities that cater to different typing styles and preferences.
Weight
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is lighter in terms of actuation force compared to the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch, with 45 grams versus 55 grams, respectively. The bottom out force for the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch is 63 grams, while the bottom out force for the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is unknown. Those who prefer a lighter touch may lean towards the Lotus V2, as it requires less force to trigger a keystroke. However, individuals who appreciate a more substantial typing experience may opt for the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring switch due to its heavier actuation and bottom out forces. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on personal preference for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, making it shorter than the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. The Lotus V2 offers a quicker response time due to its shorter travel distance, making it a preferred choice for gamers looking for speed and agility. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Double Spring switch provides a deeper press with its longer travel distance, offering a more substantial feel to those who prefer a switch with more depth. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of travel distance and the type of typing or gaming experience one is seeking.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Shadow (Ink) Double Spring for $3.57.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is known for its lack of specific sound characteristics, which may result in a quieter typing experience overall. On the other hand, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch is well-regarded for producing a clacky and high-pitched sound profile. This means that when typing on the Shadow switch, you can expect a sharp, snappy, and crisp sound with each keypress, adding an auditory element to your typing experience. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can be influenced by factors such as the keyboard's construction and the keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Lotus V2 linear switch does not have a specific tactile description available. In contrast, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch is known for its sharp, accented, snappy, bouncy, and stepped tactile feedback. This means that when typing on the Shadow switch, you can expect a high feedback intensity with a distinct tactile bump, providing a lively and responsive typing experience. The switch offers a medium-high level of tactility, striking a balance between being noticeable without overpowering the overall typing feel.
Considering the subjective qualities of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch, it is clear that they offer different experiences in terms of sound and feel. If you are looking for a quieter typing experience with a less defined tactile feedback, the Lotus V2 may be the better choice for you. However, if you prefer a switch with a clacky sound profile and a sharp, lively tactile feel, the Shadow switch with its double spring design would be more suitable. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on your personal preferences for sound and typing feel.
Conclusion
In closing, if you are looking for a smooth and consistent typing experience with a light touch and no bottom out force, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch would be an ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a tactile switch with a medium-high level of tactility, deep thocks, and a bottom out force of 63 grams, then the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring switch would be more suited to your preferences. Consider the sound and feel descriptions of each switch to determine which one aligns best with your typing style and preferences. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches comes down to personal preference and the typing experience you are looking to achieve.
Mentioned in this article
