Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Akko V3 Silver Pro
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Akko V3 Silver Pro switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Akko V3 Silver Pro, both linear switches. The Lotus V2 is known for its smooth and consistent keystrokes, making it a favorite among typists for its reliability. On the other hand, the V3 Silver Pro is tailored towards gamers, offering a seamless and satisfying typing experience with its light actuation force and shortened travel distance. While the Lotus V2 is characterized by its simplicity and consistency, the V3 Silver Pro stands out for its gaming-specific features such as effortless keystrokes and pleasing bassy sound. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
13.8mm spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Akko V3 Silver Pro both contribute to the unique sound profile of the switches. The Lotus V2 utilizes POM for both its top and bottom housing, providing a deeper and more muted sound profile. In contrast, the V3 Silver Pro features a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, while its nylon bottom housing produces a deeper and fuller sound. This highlights how different housing materials can significantly alter the overall sound experience of a mechanical keyboard switch.
Despite the differences in sound profiles, both switches incorporate housing materials that have specific purposes. For example, POM is known for creating a unique and pleasing sound, while polycarbonate is recognized for its ability to produce a clear and resonant sound profile. Similarly, nylon is utilized for its sound-absorbing properties, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. Ultimately, the choice of housing material can have a noticeable impact on the typing experience and overall sound quality of a mechanical keyboard switch.
It is important to consider how the top and bottom housing materials interact with each other when comparing the Lotus V2 and the V3 Silver Pro. The qualities of the housing material are divided between the top and bottom of the switch, influencing aspects such as the bottom-out sound and feel. While the bottom housing plays a significant role in how a key press feels, the top housing affects the sound produced when a key is released. By understanding the effects of different housing materials, keyboard enthusiasts can tailor their typing experience to their preferences, whether they prioritize a deeper, more muted sound or a sharper, crisper sound profile.
Weight
Comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Akko V3 Silver Pro linear switch, we see that the Lotus V2 is lighter with an actuation force of 45 grams compared to the V3 Silver Pro's 40 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the V3 Silver Pro is lighter with 45 grams, whereas the Lotus V2's bottom out force is unavailable. Those looking for a lighter typing experience may prefer the Akko V3 Silver Pro, as it requires less force to actuate and bottom out. On the other hand, those who prefer a stronger push feel may lean towards the Lotus V2, as it offers a slightly higher actuation force. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference and the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Akko V3 Silver Pro linear switch both offer relatively short travel distances compared to traditional switches. The Lotus V2 has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, slightly longer than the V3 Silver Pro's 3.3 mm. While both switches are in the shorter range of travel distances, the Lotus V2 is slightly on the longer side. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may prefer the slightly shorter travel distance of the V3 Silver Pro, while those who prefer a bit more depth in their keystrokes may lean towards the Lotus V2. Overall, both switches offer a modern and efficient travel distance that caters to different preferences in typing and gaming experiences.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The Akko V3 Silver Pro has an MSRP of $4.22 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the V3 Silver Pro for $3.10.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Lotus V2 linear switch doesn't have a specific sound characteristic that is widely known, making it a versatile option for users who prefer a quieter typing experience. On the other hand, the Akko V3 Silver Pro linear switch is notable for its high-pitched sound profile, providing a sharp and crisp sound with each keystroke. This difference in sound profile allows users to choose between a more understated typing experience with the Lotus V2 or a more pronounced and satisfying auditory feedback with the V3 Silver Pro.
Moving on to feel, the Lotus V2 linear switch does not have a defined feel characteristic associated with it. In contrast, the Akko V3 Silver Pro linear switch offers a range of unique tactile experiences. Descriptors such as "easy-to-press," "creamy," "feathery," "polished," and "silky" indicate the smooth and effortless typing feel that users can expect from the V3 Silver Pro. These characteristics result in reduced finger fatigue and enhanced comfort during long typing sessions, catering specifically to gamers and users who demand quick and responsive key presses.
Ultimately, when considering the sound and feel qualities of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Akko V3 Silver Pro linear switch, it is evident that each switch offers a distinct typing experience tailored to different preferences. The Lotus V2 provides a quieter and more versatile option, while the V3 Silver Pro excels in delivering a crisp and tactile typing experience ideal for gamers seeking speed and precision. Whether you prioritize a quieter sound profile or a more tactile typing feel, both switches offer quality performance that caters to diverse user needs. If you prefer one characteristic over the other, selecting the appropriate switch can enhance your overall typing experience and satisfaction with your mechanical keyboard setup.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Akko V3 Silver Pro linear switch, consider the specific needs of your typing or gaming experience. If you prioritize a switch with no bottom out force and are looking for a unique typing feel, the Lotus V2 may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you require a switch with a light actuation force, shortened travel distance, and a pleasing bassy sound for gaming purposes, the Akko V3 Silver Pro would be more suitable. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preference for typing feel, sound profile, and intended use.
Mentioned in this article
