United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Aflion Thunder Shadow

An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Aflion Thunder Shadow switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Aflion Thunder Shadow stand out as unique options. The Lotus V2, a linear switch, is praised for its smooth keystrokes with no tactile bump, allowing for rapid and consistent typing. On the other hand, the Thunder Shadow, a tactile switch from Aflion, offers a distinct tactile bump that provides feedback for each keypress, making it ideal for those who enjoy a more tactile typing experience. While the Lotus V2's simplicity may appeal to those seeking a straightforward typing experience, the Thunder Shadow's intricate tactile feedback and medium weight feel may attract users looking for a more engaging typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

63.5g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Box

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

20mm double-stage spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Aflion Thunder Shadow play a significant role in the sound profile of the switches. The POM top housing of the Lotus V2 creates a deeper and more muted sound, while the polycarbonate top housing of the Thunder Shadow produces a sharper and crisper sound. This difference in sound profile is due to the properties of the materials used - POM being softer and polycarbonate being stiffer. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting, adding to its aesthetic appeal.

In terms of the bottom housing, the Lotus V2 utilizes POM to create a deep and unique sound profile, while the Thunder Shadow employs nylon for a fuller and rounder sound. Nylon absorbs more sound than POM, resulting in a duller sound when typing on switches with nylon bottom housings. This difference in sound profiles between the two switches can greatly affect the typing experience and preference of users. Whether one prefers a deeper, muted sound or a fuller, crisper sound will ultimately depend on personal taste and typing style.

The combination of different housing materials in the top and bottom of a switch can impact both the sound and feel of typing. The bottom housing has more influence on the bottom-out sound and feel when a key is pressed, while the top housing affects the sound when a key is released. This division of qualities between the top and bottom housings allows for a more dynamic typing experience, catering to different preferences and typing styles. While the Lotus V2 and Thunder Shadow may have contrasting housing materials, the result is similar in that both switches aim to provide a unique and satisfying typing experience for users.

Weight

The actuation force of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is 45 grams, whereas the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch has an unknown actuation force. On the other hand, the bottom out force of the Lotus V2 is not available, while the Thunder Shadow has a bottom out force of 63.5 grams, making it a medium-heavy switch. The Lotus V2 is lighter in terms of actuation force compared to the Thunder Shadow, which may be preferred by those who type for longer periods or engage in extended gaming sessions. Conversely, the Thunder Shadow provides a stronger push feel for a more substantial typing experience, suitable for users who prefer heavier forces when typing. Both switches offer different experiences based on their actuation and bottom out forces, catering to different preferences and typing styles.

Travel distance

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, while the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch has a travel distance of just slightly longer at 3.5 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, making them ideal for those seeking fast response times. Gamers, in particular, may appreciate this shorter travel distance for quick keystrokes. However, the slight difference of 0.1 mm between the two switches may not be noticeable to the average user. Therefore, when comparing the travel distance of the Lotus V2 and the Thunder Shadow, you can expect similar results in terms of key feel and actuation speed. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches may come down to personal preference in terms of the slight variation in travel distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.

The Aflion Thunder Shadow has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Thunder Shadow for $3.91.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Lotus V2 linear switch, unfortunately, lacks a specific reputation or characteristic in this regard. In contrast, the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch is noted for its neutral sound signature. This means that the Thunder Shadow provides a moderate sound profile that is suitable for a wide range of users and environments, making it a versatile option for anyone looking for a balanced auditory experience in their typing.

Moving on to feel, the Lotus V2 linear switch does not have a defined reputation for its tactile feedback or overall typing experience. On the other hand, the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch is known for providing an invigorating feel. This means that users can expect pronounced tactile feedback, a moderate to firm actuation force, as well as a snappy and reactive typing experience. Overall, this creates an immersive sensation that enhances the typing process.

Considering all available information, the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch stands out for its well-balanced combination of tactile feedback and sound profile, making it a solid choice for users seeking a versatile and engaging typing experience. While the Lotus V2 linear switch may not have as much recognition in terms of sound and feel, individuals looking for a similar neutral sound profile and invigorating tactile feedback can expect comparable results with the Thunder Shadow switch. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences and typing styles in the mechanical keyboard community.

Conclusion

In closing, when deciding between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch, consider your typing preferences and needs. If you prioritize a smooth and consistent keystroke with no tactile bump, the Lotus V2 may be the better choice for you. However, if you enjoy a pronounced tactile bump with a medium weight feel, the Thunder Shadow could provide a more engaging typing experience. Ultimately, the decision should be based on your personal preferences and typing style to ensure the best fit for your mechanical keyboard setup.

Mentioned in this article