Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Bsun Tomcat

Overview

When it comes to selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Bsun Tomcat both present compelling choices for enthusiasts seeking a linear switch experience. While the Lotus V2 boasts an ergonomic design that aims to enhance comfort during extended typing sessions, the Bsun Tomcat is celebrated for its Ly stems, which provide a uniquely smooth typing experience and a distinct resonant sound profile that many users find appealing. The Lotus V2 shines in its simplicity and reliability, making it a solid choice for those who prioritize a consistent feel, while the Tomcat caters to users seeking both tactile satisfaction and an enriching auditory feedback. Ultimately, your decision may hinge on factors such as preference for sound and feel versus comfort and reliability; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Jerrzi Lotus V2 Linear

Bsun Tomcat Linear

$4.00

$3.59 per 10

$2.99 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Bsun Tomcat utilize different materials for their top housings, leading to distinct sound profiles in their key switches. The Lotus V2 features a POM (polyoxymethylene) top housing which is known for producing a deeper and more muted sound profile. This characteristic is attributed to POM's pliability, which tends to absorb some sound waves, creating a softer auditory experience. In comparison, the Tomcat opts for a polycarbonate top housing that generates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. The stiffness of polycarbonate allows for a more resonant response, making it ideal for those who lean towards a brighter, more pronounced audio feedback, especially under RGB lighting conditions where the translucency of the material enhances visual effects.

When examining the bottom housings, both switches display a thoughtful approach to balancing sound characteristics. The Lotus V2 features a POM bottom housing as well, shaping its sound profile to be deeper and more muted, similar to its top housing. Conversely, the Tomcat utilizes a nylon bottom housing, which is historically known for contributing a fuller and deeper sound profile due to its softer texture that absorbs sound. The combination of the nylon bottom housing with the polycarbonate top housing enables the Tomcat to achieve a dynamic sound range; where the top provides clarity and brightness, the bottom deepens the overall sonic signature. Consequently, the potential for a more complex auditory experience in the Tomcat arises from the contrasting qualities of its top and bottom materials.

Ultimately, the differences in housing materials between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Bsun Tomcat significantly impact their overall sound profiles. The Lotus V2’s matching POM top and bottom housings deliver a consistent acoustic experience characterized by muted depth, while the Tomcat's combination of a hard polycarbonate top and soft nylon bottom enables a richer contrast, resulting in a dynamic sound landscape. However, for users who desire deeper and fuller tones, the Lotus V2 can produce similar results through the combined effects of both POM housings, emphasizing its strength in delivering a cohesive auditory experience. Thus, while differing in material compositions, both switches offer unique approaches to meet varied preferences in sound and typing experience.

Weight

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch exhibit similarities in their actuation force while differing in their bottom out force. Both switches feature an actuation force of 45 grams, suggesting that users will experience the same ease of actuation, making them suitable for extended typing sessions or long gaming sessions. However, the Bsun Tomcat linear switch has a bottom out force of 54 grams, indicating a firmer resistance when pressed down completely, which provides a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a heavier feel. In contrast, the bottom out force for the Jerrzi Lotus V2 is unavailable, which makes it difficult to gauge its performance fully. As a result, while both switches have the same actuation force, the Tomcat's heavier bottom out force may appeal to users looking for a more tactile feedback, whereas the Lotus V2 might offer an alternative for those who favor a lighter feel, contingent on its unspecified bottom out force.

Travel distance

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch exhibit different travel distances, with the Lotus V2 measuring 3.4 mm and the Tomcat measuring 3.6 mm. This makes the Lotus V2 the shorter option, while the Tomcat offers a slightly longer travel distance. If you're looking for a more responsive keystroke, the Lotus V2's shorter distance may provide quicker actuation, making it a suitable choice for gamers who thrive on speed. Conversely, those who favor a more substantial feel when typing might prefer the Tomcat, as its longer travel distance offers a deeper feedback that could enhance the typing experience. Ultimately, your preference for either switch will depend on whether you value responsiveness or depth in your keystrokes.

Price comparison

Typing experience

The sound profile of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch remains unspecified, making it difficult to draw a definitive comparison in this aspect. In contrast, the Bsun Tomcat linear switch is characterized by its resonant sound profile, which indicates that it produces a noticeable sound when activated. It's important to remember that sound perception can be influenced by various factors like the keyboard build and keycap material, so while the Tomcat’s sound profile is distinct, the Lotus V2 might still offer unique auditory characteristics that are simply not highlighted.

When it comes to the tactile feel, the Lotus V2 lacks a clear description, leaving an air of mystery around its typing experience. However, the Bsun Tomcat linear switch is praised for its Ly stems, which contribute to a super smooth typing feel. This smoothness enhances the overall experience, allowing for effortless keystrokes. If the Lotus V2 provides a similar smoothness, it could still deliver a comparable feel, but without further details, it's uncertain how it stacks up against the Tomcat's well-regarded performance.

In summary, while the Bsun Tomcat linear switch offers a discernible resonant sound profile and a super smooth typing experience thanks to its unique stem design, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 does not have specific attributes disclosed in these areas. If the Lotus V2 delivers a similarly smooth typing experience, users might find satisfaction in both options; however, the lack of sound characterization for the Lotus V2 leaves its qualitative comparisons somewhat incomplete. Accordingly, if sound and feel are pivotal to your decision-making, the Tomcat provides more clarity in its offerings compared to the somewhat enigmatic Lotus V2.

Conclusion

To sum up, the choice between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch ultimately comes down to your specific preferences and typing style. If you are looking for a switch that offers a very smooth experience and does not require much force to press down, the Lotus V2 might be the right fit for you—especially if sound level isn't a significant concern for you, as its sound profile tends to be more subdued. On the other hand, if you appreciate a switch that delivers a distinct tactile feedback with a moderate bottom-out force, the Tomcat would likely be the better choice. The Tomcat's Ly stems contribute to a notably smooth typing experience, combined with a resonant sound profile that many users find satisfying. In short, consider your typing habits: go for the Lotus V2 if you enjoy a lighter, quieter feel with less resistance, or opt for the Tomcat if you prefer a richer sound and a bit more tactile feedback with a balanced force.

Mentioned in this article

Jerrzi Lotus V2 Linear

$4.00

$3.59 per 10

Learn more

Bsun Tomcat Linear

$2.99 per 10

Learn more