Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. Durock White Lotus
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Durock White Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the Durock White Lotus offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The Jerrzi Lotus V2 is a linear switch, known for its smooth key press without tactile feedback, making it a popular choice for gamers looking for consistency and speed in their keystrokes. On the other hand, the Durock White Lotus is a tactile switch, designed for typists who appreciate a slight bump at the actuation point, providing a more satisfying typing experience. The White Lotus switches also offer the added benefit of customizable RGB lighting effects, adding a visually appealing touch to your setup. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
46g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
56g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Modified PC & UPE Blend
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Gold-plated long spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and Durock White Lotus differ in terms of their top and bottom housing materials. The Lotus V2 features a POM top and bottom housing, which creates a unique and deep sound profile that is relatively muted. In contrast, the White Lotus utilizes a modified PC & UPE Blend top housing and a nylon bottom housing. The modified PC & UPE Blend top housing gives the White Lotus a premium feel, while the nylon bottom housing produces a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition.
While the top housing materials of the Lotus V2 and White Lotus differ, they both provide unique sound profiles. The POM top housing of the Lotus V2 creates a pleasing and deep sound, while the modified PC & UPE Blend top housing of the White Lotus offers a premium feel. However, when it comes to the bottom housing materials, the contrast is more apparent. The POM bottom housing of the Lotus V2 contributes to its muted sound profile, while the nylon bottom housing of the White Lotus absorbs more sound and produces a rounder, duller sound.
In terms of overall typing experience, the housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and Durock White Lotus play a significant role in determining the sound and feel of the switches. The split design of having different top and bottom housing materials allows for a unique sound and feel combination when typing. The impact of the bottom housing is felt during bottom-out sounds and feels, while the top housing influences the sound when releasing a key. Despite their differences, both switches offer a satisfying typing experience with their distinct housing materials.
Weight
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a slightly lighter actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Durock White Lotus tactile switch, which has an actuation force of 46 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Durock White Lotus is heavier at 56 grams while the bottom out force for the Lotus V2 is unavailable. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Lotus V2 due to its lighter actuation force, which can help reduce fatigue during long typing sessions. On the other hand, the Durock White Lotus offers a more substantial typing experience with its heavier bottom out force, making it a preferred choice for users who enjoy a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, making it the shorter of the two options compared to the Durock White Lotus tactile switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. While both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, the White Lotus offers a slightly deeper key press experience compared to the Lotus V2. Gamers looking for a faster response time may lean towards the Lotus V2 with its shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial key press may find the White Lotus to be more to their liking. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for key press depth and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The Durock White Lotus has an MSRP of $5.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the White Lotus for $4.57.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the White Lotus tactile switch offers a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, providing a bass-heavy and mellow tone that is not overwhelming. This makes it a suitable option for various environments, whether it be at home or in the office. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 linear switch's sound qualities are unknown, so it's difficult to directly compare the two switches in this aspect. However, both switches can provide a pleasant typing experience depending on the other factors at play, such as the keyboard and keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the White Lotus tactile switch is described as easy-to-press, offering gentle resistance and a light actuation force that makes typing effortless and comfortable. The mild and subtle characteristics of this switch create a typing experience that is approachable to most users and suitable for shared spaces due to its non-resonant sound signature. On the other hand, the specific feel of the Lotus V2 linear switch is unknown, making it challenging to directly compare the two switches in this regard. However, both switches aim to provide a pleasant and satisfying typing experience with their respective qualities.
Overall, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the Durock White Lotus tactile switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The White Lotus switch is known for its delicate tactility, while the Lotus V2's characteristics are unspecified. Both switches provide a pleasant typing experience, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on personal preference for sound and feel. With the White Lotus offering a light tactile experience and the Lotus V2 potentially offering a smooth linear feel, users can expect a satisfying typing experience regardless of which switch they choose.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch or the Durock White Lotus tactile switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preference and typing style. If you prefer a switch with no bottom out force and are looking for a unique option, the Lotus V2 may be the way to go. However, if you value a light tactile feedback with a medium-light bottom out force and enjoy a typing experience that is both comfortable and visually appealing, the White Lotus would be the ideal choice for you. The Wight Lotus switches provide a delicate tactility, easy-to-press feel, and are designed to enhance your typing experience with their luminous RGB lighting effects. Ultimately, choose the switch that aligns best with your typing preferences and needs.
Mentioned in this article
