United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX Lotus vs. Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring

An in-depth look at the HMX Lotus and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX Lotus linear switch and Aflion Shadow ink Single Spring tactile switch stand out for their unique characteristics. The Lotus switch offers a super bouncy feeling with a medium weight of 50g bottom out and a bright, resonant sound, making each keystroke a delightful experience. On the other hand, the Shadow Single Spring switch is praised for its medium level of tactility, lower actuation and bottom-out force, and a deep thocky sound profile. While the Lotus switch is categorized as linear, providing a smooth keystroke, the Shadow switch falls under the tactile category, offering feedback with each press. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

48g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-staged spring

Spring

20mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the HMX Lotus and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches differ significantly in terms of the sound profile they produce. The Lotus's nylon top and bottom housings create a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the softer nature of nylon, which absorbs sound and creates a duller and rounder sound. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring's polycarbonate top and bottom housings lead to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile because of polycarbonate's stiffer nature, resulting in a clearer and more resonant sound. These contrasting sound profiles make each switch unique in their auditory experience.

Aesthetically, the housing materials of the two switches also differ in their appearance and functionality. The Lotus's nylon housing does not offer the translucency of polycarbonate, making it less suitable for switches designed to utilize RGB lighting. In contrast, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring's polycarbonate housing's clear appearance allows for RGB lighting to shine through, enhancing the overall look and customization of the switch. While both housing materials serve their purpose in creating a housing for the switch components, the choice between nylon and polycarbonate may depend on personal preference and design considerations.

Despite the differences in their housing materials, the HMX Lotus and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches both offer a unique typing experience that can be tailored to individual preferences. While the nylon and polycarbonate housings influence the sound and feel of the switches differently, both switches are designed to provide a satisfying typing experience. Whether you prefer the deeper and fuller sound profile of nylon or the sharper and crisper sound profile of polycarbonate, both switches offer quality housing materials that contribute to an enjoyable typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches may come down to personal preference in sound, aesthetics, and typing feel.

Weight

The HMX Lotus linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch, which has an actuation force of 48 grams. Both switches have a light actuation force, making them suitable for those who prefer a lighter typing experience. However, when it comes to the bottom out force, the Lotus requires 50 grams of force while the Shadow (Ink) requires 55 grams. This means that the Shadow (Ink) switch provides a slightly firmer feel when pressing down fully. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on whether you prefer a lighter actuation force or a slightly heavier bottom out force for a more substantial typing experience.

Travel distance

The travel distance of the HMX Lotus linear switch is 3.5 mm, while the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch has the longer travel distance compared to the Lotus switch. The Lotus switch offers a slightly shorter travel distance, making it preferable for those looking for a faster response time, such as gamers. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch with the longer travel distance may provide a more satisfying key press for those who prefer a deeper feeling when typing. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences and typing style, but both switches offer a different experience in terms of travel distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Lotus has an MSRP of $3.49 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus for $2.99.

The Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring for $3.57.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the HMX Lotus linear switch offers a bright and resonant sound profile, while the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch provides a deep and thocky sound that is sure to please enthusiasts. Both switches can deliver an enjoyable auditory experience, with the Lotus offering a more vibrant sound and the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring providing a satisfying thock.

In terms of feel, the HMX Lotus switch is known for its bouncy sensation, giving users a super responsive and lively typing experience. On the other hand, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch offers a medium level of tactility, with a lower actuation and bottom-out force, providing a more approachable tactile feel. Both switches cater to different preferences, with the Lotus focusing on a spring-like feedback and the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring emphasizing a tactile response.

Overall, for users looking for a switch with a bouncy and bright sound profile, the HMX Lotus linear switch would be an excellent choice. On the other hand, those seeking a tactile switch with a deep and thocky sound, along with a medium level of tactility, might prefer the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities that can enhance the typing experience based on individual preferences.

Conclusion

Ultimately, when deciding between the HMX Lotus linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch, you should consider your preference for actuation and bottom-out force. If you prefer a light bottom-out force of 50 grams and enjoy a bright, resonant sound with a bouncy feel, then the Lotus switch would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier bottom-out force of 55 grams, and want a medium level of tactility with a deep thocky sound profile, then the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch may be more suited to your typing style. Make your decision based on the specific characteristics and features that align with your preferences and typing needs.

Mentioned in this article