United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gazzew LT vs. Durock Lupine

An in-depth look at the Gazzew LT and the Durock Lupine switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, two options that often enter the conversation are the Gazzew LT and the Durock Lupine. Each switch offers its own unique qualities and appeal, making it difficult to definitively declare one as superior to the other. On one hand, the Gazzew LT switches captivate users with their alluring lilac hue and deliver a delightful auditory experience with their deep, resonant thockiness. Furthermore, their seamless glide with every keystroke enhances the overall typing experience. On the other hand, the Durock Lupine switches provide a distinct sensation with their two-stage long springs. This design ensures consistent weight distribution when pressing down and a more powerful upward movement on the rebound. As for sound, the Lupine switches offer a classic clacky profile that adds a touch of nostalgia to each keystroke. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the switch that aligns with your preferences and typing style.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

65g

Bottom-out force

62g

Pre-travel

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Total travel

3.70 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Proprietary Gazzew blend

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Proprietary Gazzew blend

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel Korean spring

Spring

Two-stage long spring

Housing materials

The Gazzew LT and the Durock Lupine differ in their choice of housing materials, resulting in distinct sound profiles. The LT utilizes a proprietary Gazzew blend for both the top and bottom housing, which is known for its softness. This softness contributes to a rich and deep sound profile when typing, creating a pleasing auditory experience. In contrast, the Lupine opts for a polycarbonate top housing. Polycarbonate is a stiffer plastic, giving the Lupine a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound when compared to the LT. This material choice also makes the Lupine ideal for those who prioritize using RGB lighting due to its translucency.

While the top housings of the LT and Lupine differ, leading to varying sound profiles, their bottom housings also showcase contrasting materials. The LT continues to utilize its proprietary Gazzew blend, offering a rich and deep sound when typing. This soft plastic absorbs less sound, resulting in a clearer and more resonant sound profile. On the other hand, the Lupine's nylon bottom housing brings a classic switch housing material to the table. Nylon is known for elicit a deeper and fuller sound when typing, thanks to its relatively softer composition. This softer plastic absorbs more sound, leading to a duller and rounder sound profile compared to the LT.

While the housing materials of the LT and Lupine may differ, it is important to note that the choice between the two ultimately depends on individual preferences. If you prioritize a softer and richer sound, the LT with its Gazzew blend housing materials would be an excellent choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a crisper and higher-pitched sound profile, the Lupine's polycarbonate top housing may be more appealing. However, both switches offer distinct auditory experiences with their respective housing materials, so regardless of the choice, users can expect satisfying results.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Durock Lupine linear switch, we find that both switches have an unavailable actuation force. This means that they require a force that is currently unknown to trigger a keystroke. However, when it comes to the bottom out force, we see a slight difference. The Gazzew LT linear switch has a bottom out force of 65 grams, which falls into the medium-heavy range, while the Durock Lupine linear switch has a bottom out force of 62 grams, which is considered medium.

Considering weight as a factor, those who prefer a lighter switch may find the Gazzew LT linear switch more suitable for their needs, as it allows for longer typing periods, making it ideal for work or extended gaming sessions. On the other hand, for those who prefer a stronger push feel and a more substantial typing experience, the slightly heavier bottom out force of the Gazzew LT switch might be the better option.

Overall, while the actuation forces of both switches are unavailable, indicating potentially similar results in terms of triggering keystrokes, the Gazzew LT linear switch offers a slightly heavier bottom out force compared to the Durock Lupine linear switch, which could provide a different typing experience for those who prioritize a stronger push feel.

Travel distance

The Gazzew LT linear switch and the Durock Lupine linear switch have different travel distances. The LT has a travel distance of 3.2 mm, while the Lupine has a travel distance of 3.7 mm. In terms of the most traditional travel distance, which is 4.0 mm, both switches fall short. However, the Gazzew LT offers a slightly shorter travel distance compared to the Lupine. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may prefer the LT with its 3.2 mm travel distance. On the other hand, those who prefer a deeper, more substantial feel when pressing down on a key may be more inclined to choose the Lupine and its longer 3.7 mm travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the Gazzew LT and the Durock Lupine will depend on an individual's personal preference for travel distance and the desired level of responsiveness.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Durock Lupine has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lupine for $4.25.

The Gazzew LT comes in at $6.50 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Gazzew LT switches are best described as bassy, thocky, and low-pitched. These switches offer a deep and rich sound profile with every press, resembling the depth and richness associated with bass tones. The resulting sound can be characterized as a satisfying and resonant "thock" or "knock". On the other hand, the Durock Lupine switches have a more neutral sound profile. They produce a moderate and crisp sound when pressed, without the emphasis on bass. If you prefer a sharper and less bass-heavy sound, the Lupine switches would be a better choice.

In terms of feel, the Gazzew LT switches do not have specific descriptors provided. However, based on the information given, we can infer that they offer a seamless glide with each keystroke. While the specific feel may not be known, the lack of specific descriptors suggests a smooth and comfortable typing experience. On the other hand, the Durock Lupine switches are described as providing a mild and polished feel. This means that they offer a gentle typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. The mild nature of these switches makes them approachable to most users, as they provide a safe, middle-ground feel.

Overall, both the Gazzew LT and Durock Lupine switches have their own unique qualities. The Gazzew LT switches excel in providing a bassy and thocky sound profile along with a seamless glide during typing. On the other hand, the Durock Lupine switches offer a more neutral sound profile and a mild, polished feel. Depending on your preference for sound and feel, either of these switches can provide an excellent typing experience. If you enjoy the sound and feel of the Gazzew LT switches, you can expect similar results with Durock Lupine switches due to their emphasis on a gentle and neutral typing experience.

Conclusion

To sum up, if you prioritize a smooth and refined typing experience with a sleek sound profile, the Durock Lupine linear switch would be an excellent choice for you. Its neutral sound profile, moderate actuation force requirement, and two-stage long springs provide a consistent weight distribution and a more powerful upward movement upon rebound, resulting in a satisfying clacky sound. Additionally, the Lupine switch offers a mild typing experience with a polished finish, ensuring reduced friction and smooth key travel.

On the other hand, if you seek a unique and immersive auditory experience, the Gazzew LT linear switch would be the way to go. With their enticing lilac hue, these switches offer a deep and resonant thockiness. The LT switches have a medium-heavy bottom out force and provide a seamless glide with every keystroke. Their bassy, thocky, and low-pitched sound profile adds a depth and richness reminiscent of bass tones.

Ultimately, the choice between the Gazzew LT and Durock Lupine linear switches depends on your personal preferences for sound and feel. Consider whether you prefer a more intense and immersive auditory experience with the LT switches or a consistent and clacky sound with the Lupine switches. Additionally, think about whether you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force or a medium one and whether you prioritize a gentle typing experience or a polished switch with reduced friction. By considering these factors, you can select the switch that best suits your preferences and enhances your overall typing experience.

Mentioned in this article