Gazzew LT vs. Outemu Dustproof Red
An in-depth look at the Gazzew LT and the Outemu Dustproof Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gazzew LT and the Outemu Dustproof Red mechanical keyboard switches, both of which are linear switches, we see distinct differences in their characteristics. The Gazzew LT stands out with its enticing lilac hue and offers an auditory symphony of deep, resonant thockiness while providing a seamless glide with every keystroke. Categorized as bassy, thocky, low-pitched, the LT switch is ideal for those who appreciate a tactile and satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Dustproof Red switch lacks specific standout features but is still a reliable option for those seeking a linear switch. Categorized as neutral, the Dustproof Red switch may appeal to users looking for a simpler and straightforward typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
65g
Bottom-out force
60g
Pre-travel
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.20 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel Korean spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Gazzew LT and the Outemu Dustproof Red both offer unique qualities in their housing materials that contribute to the overall sound profile of the switch. The Gazzew LT's proprietary Gazzew blend top housing, also known as "boba plastic," delivers a rich and deep sound profile due to its softness. In contrast, the Dustproof Red's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. While the Gazzew LT provides a softer and richer sound, the Dustproof Red offers a clearer and more resonant sound, highlighting the differences in material choices between the two switches.
The Gazzew LT's proprietary Gazzew blend bottom housing and the Dustproof Red's nylon bottom housing also play a significant role in shaping the sound profile of the switches. The Gazzew LT's bottom housing, like its top housing, delivers a rich and deep sound profile due to its softness, while the Dustproof Red's nylon bottom housing elicits a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nylon material of the Dustproof Red absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound compared to the Gazzew LT. These differences in bottom housing materials further distinguish the sound characteristics of each switch.
Although the Gazzew LT and the Outemu Dustproof Red feature different housing materials in both the top and bottom, they each excel in creating distinct sound profiles. The Gazzew LT's softer Gazzew blend materials deliver a rich and deep sound, while the Dustproof Red's polycarbonate and nylon materials create sharper and fuller sound profiles, respectively. Despite the differences in housing materials, both switches aim to provide a satisfying typing experience with unique sound qualities that cater to different preferences. Ultimately, whether using the Gazzew LT or the Outemu Dustproof Red, users can expect a premium typing experience tailored to their sound preferences.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch, there are noticeable differences. The Gazzew LT has a bottom out force of 65 grams, making it slightly heavier than the Outemu Dustproof Red with a bottom out force of 60 grams. However, the actuation force of the Gazzew LT is not specified, while the Outemu Dustproof Red has an actuation force of 45 grams. This means that the Outemu Dustproof Red requires less force to trigger a keystroke compared to the Gazzew LT. If we consider weight, some may prefer the Outemu Dustproof Red for its lighter actuation force, making it easier for extended typing sessions. On the other hand, the Gazzew LT may be preferred by those who prefer a heavier typing experience due to its higher bottom out force. Overall, the Gazzew LT provides a slightly heavier typing experience, while the Outemu Dustproof Red offers a lighter actuation force for smoother typing.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch, it is clear that the LT has a shorter distance of 3.2 mm while the Dustproof Red has a longer distance of 4 mm. The LT's shorter travel distance may be preferred by gamers looking for faster response times, while the Dustproof Red's longer travel distance may appeal to those who prefer a more substantial feel when typing. Both switches offer different experiences due to their travel distance, so selecting the right one will depend on individual preferences. Ultimately, both switches provide unique typing experiences that can cater to a variety of typing styles and preferences.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Gazzew LT comes in at $6.50, whereas the Outemu Dustproof Red comes in at $3.10.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Gazzew LT linear switch stands out with its bassy, thocky, and low-pitched characteristics, providing a deep and satisfying auditory experience with each key press. On the other hand, the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch's sound profile remains unknown, making it difficult to directly compare to the LT in this aspect. However, it is important to note that the sound produced by a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard housing and keycaps used.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, information about the Gazzew LT linear switch's tactile feedback and actuation force remains unknown. Similarly, details about the tactile feel and actuation force of the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch are also unavailable. Without this information, it is challenging to provide a direct comparison of the subjective feel between the two switches.
Taking all available information into consideration, the Gazzew LT linear switch clearly excels in delivering a unique and satisfying sound profile characterized by its bassy, thocky, and low-pitched qualities. While the sound and feel of the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch are still unknown, it is likely that the LT will provide a more distinctive auditory experience. Ultimately, if you are looking for a switch with a deep and resonant thockiness, the Gazzew LT linear switch would be a highly recommended choice.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when deciding between the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch, consider the factors that matter most to you. If you prioritize a medium-heavy bottom out force and enjoy a deep, resonant thocky sound with every keystroke, the Gazzew LT may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly lighter bottom out force and are looking for a reliable linear switch without a specific sound profile, the Outemu Dustproof Red could be a suitable option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences in terms of force, sound, and overall typing experience. Experimenting with different switches can help you find the perfect match for your mechanical keyboard setup.
Mentioned in this article
