HMX Lucky vs. Gazzew U4T

Overview

When it comes to selecting the right mechanical keyboard switch, the choice often boils down to personal preference and typing style. The HMX Lucky switch is a linear switch lauded for its soft and glittery nylon housings, which contribute to a lightweight and neutral typing experience that many users find both satisfying and smooth. On the other hand, the Gazzew U4T is a tactile switch that excels in delivering a delightful blend of thockiness and sharp tactility, offering an assertive tactile feedback coupled with a bassy ‘thock’ sound that enhances the auditory experience with every keystroke. While the Lucky is ideal for those who crave a seamless typing experience without the distraction of sound or resistance, the U4T appeals to users who appreciate the satisfying feel and sound of tactile feedback in their typing. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

HMX Lucky Linear

Gazzew U4T Tactile

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

$6.50 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the HMX Lucky and the Gazzew U4T switches, one notes an intriguing consistency in the type of material used: both utilize nylon for the Lucky and a proprietary "boba plastic" blend for the U4T. The nylon housing of the Lucky is known for providing a deeper and fuller sound profile because its softer composition absorbs sound more effectively than harder plastics, contributing to a more rounded acoustic experience. This characteristic is echoed in the U4T's proprietary blend, which is also designed to deliver a rich and deep sound due to its softness. Thus, while the materials may differ in composition and branding, the intended auditory outcomes are largely similar, as both aim to provide a pleasing and muted sound profile.

The bottom housings follow a similar narrative, with the Lucky employing nylon while the U4T houses a proprietary blend. Once again, both materials serve to soften the sound profile, leading to a duller and more robust auditory experience when the key is bottomed out. The bottom housing significantly influences the bottom-out sound and tactile feel of the switch; therefore, even though the two switches use different materials, they share a common ability to produce a satisfying thock when pressed down. This results in an auditory experience that is rich, despite the differences in material, as both switches aim to create a similar acoustic ambiance through their softer housing choices.

In essence, while the HMX Lucky and Gazzew U4T employ different materials for their housings, their soft compositions contribute to analogous sound profiles and feel upon activation. The nylon of the Lucky and the boba plastic blend of the U4T both prioritize sound absorption, leading to a design ethos that emphasizes warmth and richness in auditory feedback. When typing on both switches, users can expect similar auditory results thanks to the focus on softer plastic materials that shape the overall sound environment, showcasing how different compositions can achieve comparable tactile and acoustic experiences.

Weight

When comparing the HMX Lucky linear switch and the Gazzew U4T tactile switch, there is a notable difference in both actuation and bottom out forces. The Lucky switch features a light actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 43 grams, making it suitable for users who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing or gaming sessions. In contrast, the U4T switch has an unknown actuation force, but its bottom out force is significantly heavier at 65 grams, suggesting a more substantial pressing experience. This difference indicates that the U4T will require more effort both to register a keystroke and to bottom out, appealing to those who favor a firmer feel when typing. Ultimately, users looking for a lighter switch would gravitate toward the Lucky, while those who appreciate a heavier force may find the U4T more satisfying.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX Lucky linear switch and the Gazzew U4T tactile switch, the Lucky measures 3.8 mm, whereas the U4T has a travel distance of 4 mm. This means that the Gazzew U4T offers a slightly longer travel distance, aligning more with the traditional preference of 4.0 mm, which is often favored for a more pronounced keystroke experience. In contrast, the shorter 3.8 mm distance of the Lucky switch caters to those who appreciate a quicker response time, which can be particularly beneficial for gamers seeking an edge in speed. While both switches provide a satisfying experience, choosing between them will depend on personal preference: if you favor responsiveness and a more abrupt feel, the Lucky switch is the better option; if you lean towards depth and a more deliberate actuation, the U4T might be your ideal fit.

Price comparison

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the HMX Lucky linear switch doesn't have a detailed sound profile provided, making it difficult to compare directly. On the other hand, the Gazzew U4T tactile switch is characterized by a unique auditory experience marked by a bassy and thocky sound. Its design produces a deep, rich tone when keys are pressed, offering an enjoyable auditory feedback that many users appreciate. This sound is enhanced by the low frequencies that create a satisfying acoustic environment while typing.

In terms of feel, the Lucky switch is noted for its neutral yet deeply satisfying typing experience, but lacks specificity in describing tactile feedback. Conversely, the U4T switch offers a prominent tactile experience with a sharp and distinct bump that is felt with each keystroke. The intensity of this feedback enhances the typing experience, encouraging users to appreciate the tactile nature of their interactions. The U4T’s design fosters a more engaging feel, particularly for those who seek pronounced tactile sensations.

In summary, while the HMX Lucky linear switch provides a neutral and enjoyable typing experience, its sound characteristics are less defined, making it hard to gauge its auditory appeal compared to the Gazzew U4T, which excels in sound with its rich and deep thocky profile. The tactile feedback of the U4T is notably sharper, enhancing user interaction. If you're seeking a satisfying yet calm typing experience, the Lucky may serve your needs; however, if you prefer a rich auditory and tactile engagement, the U4T presents a compelling option with its delightful feedback.

Conclusion

To conclude, when deciding between the HMX Lucky linear switch and the Gazzew U4T tactile switch, it ultimately boils down to your personal preferences and typing style. If you favor a lighter touch and a smooth, unbroken keystroke that offers a deeply satisfying yet neutral typing experience, the HMX Lucky is the way to go. Its lightweight design makes it an excellent choice for extended typing sessions, especially if you appreciate a more subdued sound profile that won't be overly disruptive. Conversely, if you crave a more tactile feedback and a distinctly pronounced sound with every keystroke, the Gazzew U4T will likely meet your needs better. The U4T’s medium-heavy actuation force caters well to users who enjoy the sensation of a strong tactile bump, enhanced by a rich and bassy sound that elevates the overall typing experience. Ultimately, both switches cater to different preferences—one emphasizing a smooth and light operation while the other delivers a robust tactile response—so choose based on which attributes resonate more with your typing style and auditory preferences.

Mentioned in this article

HMX Lucky Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

Learn more

Gazzew U4T Tactile

$6.50 per 10

Learn more