Gateron Lunar Probe vs. KTT Peach
An in-depth look at the Gateron Lunar Probe and the KTT Peach switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gateron Lunar Probe and KTT Peach mechanical keyboard switches, both are linear switches offering a smooth typing experience. The Lunar Probe features Gateron's dual rail mechanism for stable and consistent keypresses, along with a pre-lubed linear sensation and a subtle sound signature. On the other hand, the KTT Peach switches boast a syrupy smooth typing experience and a deep, thocky sound profile. The Lunar Probe is known for its stability and consistency, while the Peach offers a unique sound profile. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Double-staged spring
Spring
13mm progressive spring
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the Gateron Lunar Probe and the KTT Peach, both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housings. This material creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness, making it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. The similarities in their top housings mean that users can expect a similar sound experience when typing on either switch, with the polycarbonate contributing to a clear and resonant sound. However, despite this similarity, the unique design and construction of each switch may still result in slight variations in sound and feel.
Moving on to the bottom housings, both the Lunar Probe and the Peach utilize nylon for this component. Nylon is known for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to polycarbonate, thanks to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. As a result, typing on switches with nylon bottom housings may create a duller and rounder sound, offering a different typing experience compared to switches with polycarbonate bottom housings. This difference in material can impact the overall sound and feel of the switch, providing users with a distinct typing experience based on the bottom housing material used.
In conclusion, while both the Gateron Lunar Probe and the KTT Peach share similarities in their top housing material of polycarbonate, they differ in their bottom housing material with the Lunar Probe using nylon and the Peach following suit. This contrast in bottom housing material can influence the sound and feel of typing on these switches, with nylon leading to a deeper and fuller sound compared to the sharper and crisper sound produced by polycarbonate. Ultimately, the combination of these housing materials in each switch contributes to their unique sound profiles and typing experiences for users to enjoy.
Weight
In comparing the Gateron Lunar Probe linear switch and the KTT Peach linear switch, it is evident that they have similar actuation forces of 45 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Lunar Probe requires 50 grams, while the Peach requires 53 grams. This means that the Lunar Probe is lighter in terms of bottom out force compared to the Peach, making it more suitable for individuals looking for a lighter typing experience. The Peach, on the other hand, provides a slightly heavier feel, which may be preferred by those looking for a more substantial typing experience. Both switches offer a comfortable actuation force, ensuring that users will get similar results in terms of keystroke activation. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for typing force and the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
The Gateron Lunar Probe linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the KTT Peach linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Peach switch has a longer travel distance compared to the Lunar Probe. The difference may not seem significant, but it can affect the overall feel and responsiveness of the switch. Gamers, in particular, may prefer the Lunar Probe for its slightly shorter travel distance, allowing for quicker response times. On the other hand, those who enjoy a more deliberate keypress may lean towards the Peach switch with its longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference and the type of typing experience one is looking for.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron Lunar Probe has an MSRP of $6.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lunar Probe for $4.19.
The KTT Peach comes in at $2.91 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Gateron Lunar Probe linear switch offers a subtle and smooth typing experience with a quiet sound profile that won't disturb others around you. On the other hand, the KTT Peach linear switch provides a deep, thocky sound that adds a satisfying auditory element to your typing. If you prefer a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, the Peach switch may be more to your liking. However, both switches are designed to offer a pleasant typing sound without being too loud or distracting, so you can expect similar results in terms of sound quality.
Moving on to feel, the Gateron Lunar Probe switch is known for its incredibly smooth and consistent keypresses, thanks to the dual rail mechanism that provides stability during typing. The Peach switch, on the other hand, offers a syrupy smooth typing experience that is gentle on your fingers. With a mild feel that falls into a safe, middle-ground zone, the Peach switch will be approachable to most users. While the specific feel of the Lunar Probe switch is not detailed, both switches aim to provide a smooth and enjoyable typing experience that minimizes fatigue during extended use.
Overall, when comparing the Gateron Lunar Probe linear switch and the KTT Peach linear switch, it's clear that both switches offer high-quality performance with unique characteristics. Whether you prioritize a stable and smooth keypress experience or a deep and satisfying sound profile, both switches have something to offer. Ultimately, choosing between the Lunar Probe and Peach switches will come down to personal preference and the specific typing experience you are looking for. Experimenting with different switches on various keyboards and keycap combinations can help you determine which one best suits your needs and preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the Gateron Lunar Probe linear switch and the KTT Peach linear switch, you should consider a few key factors. If you prioritize a lighter bottom out force and value stability and consistency in keypresses, the Gateron Lunar Probe switch may be the best choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force, a syrupy smooth typing experience, and a deep, thocky sound profile, the KTT Peach switch is worth considering. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences regarding keypress feeling and sound profile.
Mentioned in this article
