United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Mallo vs. Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro

An in-depth look at the KTT Mallo and the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Mallo and Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro stand out as excellent options with distinct characteristics. The Mallo is praised for its subtle tactility and medium-light typing feel, offering a balanced experience for typists. On the other hand, the V3 Matcha Green Pro provides a smooth and substantial keystroke with a satisfyingly sharp bottom-out, appealing to those who prefer a more solid and responsive switch. While the Mallo boasts a neutral sound signature and finesse in design, the Matcha Green Pro offers clear and tactile feedback with resonant clacks. Both switches have unique qualities that cater to different preferences and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

55g

Bottom-out force

55g

Bottom-out force

63g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Factory lubed

No

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

18mm spring

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Mallo and the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro, it is evident that both keyboards utilize polycarbonate for their top housing. This material choice results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the stiffer nature of polycarbonate. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. The similarities in their top housing material indicate that users can expect similar sound profiles and aesthetics from both keyboards.

However, where the keyboards differ is in their choice of bottom housing material. The Mallo features a nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to polycarbonate. Nylon's softer nature absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound that can impact the overall typing experience. On the other hand, the V3 Matcha Green Pro also incorporates a nylon bottom housing, emphasizing the importance of this material in influencing the overall sound and feel of the keyboard.

Ultimately, the split in housing materials between the top and bottom of the switches in both keyboards highlights the unique qualities that each material brings to the overall typing experience. The impact of the bottom housing is more prominent in the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing plays a significant role in the sound produced when releasing a key. By understanding the differences in housing materials, users can better appreciate how each component contributes to the overall performance and aesthetics of the KTT Mallo and the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro linear switch, it is clear that the Mallo requires no actuation force while the V3 Matcha Green Pro needs 55 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Mallo has a lighter pressure at 55 grams compared to the V3 Matcha Green Pro's 63 grams. The Mallo offers a lighter typing experience for those who prefer less resistance, making it suitable for longer typing sessions or gaming. On the other hand, the V3 Matcha Green Pro provides a slightly heavier feel, giving a more substantial typing experience. Both switches offer medium actuation forces, but the V3 Matcha Green Pro is slightly heavier in terms of bottom out force. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for key feel and typing experience.

Travel distance

The KTT Mallo tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm. The Mallo has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the V3 Matcha Green Pro, which may result in a slightly deeper keypress feel. Gamers who prefer a more responsive keypress may lean towards the V3 Matcha Green Pro with its shorter travel distance. On the other hand, those who enjoy a more substantial keypress experience may opt for the KTT Mallo tactile switch. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.

The Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro has an MSRP of $4.66 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the V3 Matcha Green Pro for $2.20.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the KTT Mallo switch offers a neutral and subdued sound profile, making it suitable for various environments without being overly distracting. On the other hand, the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro switch produces a clacky and resonant sound that is sharp, crisp, and immersive, adding a tactile auditory experience to your typing or gaming sessions. Depending on your preference for sound, the Mallo provides a subtle and gentle typing experience, while the Matcha Green Pro offers a more pronounced and satisfying click with each keystroke.

In terms of feel, the Mallo switch provides a feathery and mild typing experience with subtle tactile feedback, ideal for reducing finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. Meanwhile, the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro switch offers a bouncy and creamy typing sensation, giving a spring-like feedback and smooth, buttery keystrokes. Both switches provide different tactile experiences, with the Mallo offering a more gentle and approachable feel, while the Matcha Green Pro delivers a lively and polished typing experience.

Overall, when comparing the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro linear switch, it's clear that they offer distinct subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Mallo excels in providing a neutral sound and a feathery feel, appealing to those looking for a balanced and comfortable typing experience. In contrast, the Matcha Green Pro stands out with its clacky sound and bouncy, creamy feel, catering to users who prefer a more substantial and satisfying keystroke. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on your personal preferences for sound and feel, but rest assured that you'll receive similar results of quality and performance from both options.

Conclusion

To sum up, when considering whether to choose the KTT Mallo tactile switch or the Akko V3 Matcha Green Pro linear switch, you should take into account your preferences for actuation force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a medium-light actuation force with a subtle tactility and neutral sound signature, the Mallo switch would be a suitable choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier actuation force with a sharp bottom-out feel, along with a clacky or resonant sound profile, the V3 Matcha Green Pro switch may be more to your liking. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what type of typing experience you find most comfortable and satisfying.

Mentioned in this article