KTT Mallo vs. Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring
An in-depth look at the KTT Mallo and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
The KTT Mallo and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring are two mechanical keyboard switches that offer different characteristics for typists seeking a tactile experience. The Mallo is renowned for its subtle tactility and medium-light typing feel, providing just enough feedback without overwhelming the user. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring boasts a medium level of tactility with a lower actuation and bottom-out force, making it approachable for a wide range of typists. While the Mallo has a neutral sound signature that blends well in various typing environments, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring offers a deep and thocky sound profile for a more immersive typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
48g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Mallo and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring, we can see that both switches use polycarbonate for their top housing. This material is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that will be used with RGB lighting. However, where the Mallo differs is in its nylon bottom housing, which leads to a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Shadow's polycarbonate bottom housing, which contributes to a clear and resonant sound.
The use of different materials for the top and bottom housings in the Mallo and Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches results in a contrast in the sound and feel of the switches. The nylon bottom housing of the Mallo provides a softer and more absorbent surface, creating a duller and rounder sound when typing. On the other hand, the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Shadow contributes to a sharper and higher-pitched sound profile. This difference in bottom housing material affects the overall typing experience, with the bottom-out sound and feel being impacted by the qualities of the bottom housing.
Ultimately, while both the KTT Mallo and Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches share the use of polycarbonate for their top housing, the choice of nylon for the Mallo's bottom housing and polycarbonate for the Shadow's bottom housing results in distinct typing experiences. The combination of materials in each switch leads to differences in sound profiles, with the Mallo offering a deeper and fuller sound while the Shadow provides a crisper and more resonant sound. These differences highlight the importance of housing materials in determining the overall feel and sound of a mechanical keyboard switch.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch, there are some notable differences. The Mallo tactile switch has an actuation force of None grams, making it easier to trigger keystrokes compared to the Shadow (Ink) with an actuation force of 48 grams. However, both switches have a bottom out force of 55 grams, providing a similar typing experience when fully pressed down. For those who prefer a lighter touch, the Mallo would be the better option, allowing for longer typing sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) switch offers a bit more resistance, suitable for users who prefer a more substantial typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on individual preference for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch is the same at 4 mm. This means that both switches will offer a similar typing experience in terms of how far you have to press down on the key before it actuates. With a travel distance of 4 mm, users can expect a relatively standard tactile feedback and actuation point from either switch. Therefore, whether you choose the Mallo or the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring, you can expect a consistent typing experience in terms of travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.
The Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring for $3.57.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Mallo switch offers a neutral and subdued sound profile, making it suitable for various typing environments. On the other hand, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch features a deep and thocky sound, providing a unique auditory experience. Both switches have their own distinct sound characteristics, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and the overall setup of your keyboard.
When it comes to feel, the KTT Mallo switch is described as feathery, mild, stepped, and subtle, offering a light typing experience with a gentle tactility. On the other hand, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch is described as bouncy, providing a lively and elastic feedback sensation. If you prefer a softer touch and subtle feedback, the Mallo switch might be more up your alley. However, if you enjoy a more responsive and spring-like feel, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch could be the better choice for you.
In conclusion, both the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Mallo switch provides a balanced and subtle typing experience with a neutral sound profile, while the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch offers a deeper sound and bouncier feel. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on your personal preferences for sound and typing feel. If you enjoy one, you'll likely find similar qualities in the other.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch, consider the following guidelines. If you prioritize a balanced typing experience with a gentle tactility and neutral sound profile, the Mallo may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with a lower actuation and bottom-out force, approachable tactility, and a deep, thocky sound profile, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring could be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different typing styles and preferences, so choose based on what aligns best with your individual needs and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
