KTT Mallo vs. Aflion Thunder Shadow
An in-depth look at the KTT Mallo and the Aflion Thunder Shadow switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT Mallo and Aflion Thunder Shadow are both popular choices for those who prefer a tactile typing experience. The Mallo is praised for its subtle tactility and medium-light typing feel, making it a versatile option for various typing environments. On the other hand, the Thunder Shadow boasts a pronounced tactile bump and a medium weight feel, showcasing Aflion's dedication to innovation. While the Mallo is categorized as 'Feathery', 'Mild', 'Neutral', 'Stepped', 'Subdued', 'Subtle', the Thunder Shadow falls under 'Invigorating' and 'Neutral'. Each switch offers its own unique qualities that cater to different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
The KTT Mallo and the Aflion Thunder Shadow both utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which creates a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting, as it allows for better light diffusion. Despite both switches having the same top housing material, the overall design and construction of the switches may still impact the sound and feel of typing on them.
In terms of the bottom housing material, both the Mallo and the Thunder Shadow feature nylon. Nylon is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to other plastics. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound during typing. While both switches use nylon for their bottom housing, the impact of this material on the overall typing experience may vary based on other design elements of the switches.
Overall, the utilization of different housing materials for the top and bottom of the switches allows for a more nuanced typing experience. The qualities of the bottom housing material will impact the bottom-out sound and feel when typing on the switches, while the top housing material will have a greater influence on the sound when releasing a key. Despite similarities in housing materials between the KTT Mallo and the Aflion Thunder Shadow, other factors such as switch design and construction can still play a significant role in determining the overall sound and feel of typing on these switches.
Weight
The KTT Mallo tactile switch has a lighter bottom out force compared to the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch. The Mallo requires 55 grams of force to bottom out, while the Thunder Shadow requires 63.5 grams, making it slightly heavier. Both switches have an unknown actuation force, but based on the bottom out force alone, users can expect a medium-light typing experience with the Mallo and a medium-heavy feel with the Thunder Shadow. Those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Mallo for longer typing or gaming sessions, while those who prefer a more substantial push feel may choose the Thunder Shadow for a more robust typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for actuation and bottom out force.
Travel distance
The KTT Mallo tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. This makes the Thunder Shadow the shorter option compared to the Mallo. While both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Mallo being on the longer side and the Thunder Shadow on the shorter side, the Thunder Shadow may provide a slightly faster response time for those who prefer a shorter travel distance. On the other hand, the Mallo may offer a more substantial and satisfying key press for those who prefer a longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and desired typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.
The Aflion Thunder Shadow has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Thunder Shadow for $3.91.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the KTT Mallo and Aflion Thunder Shadow switches offer a neutral sound profile, making them versatile choices for various typing environments. The Mallo has a slightly more subdued sound compared to the Thunder Shadow, giving it a more subtle sound signature overall. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.
In terms of feel, the KTT Mallo switch is known for its feathery and mild characteristics, providing a light and comfortable typing experience ideal for extended use. On the other hand, the Aflion Thunder Shadow switch offers an invigorating feel with pronounced feedback and a moderate to firm actuation force, delivering a snappy and reactive typing sensation. While the Mallo focuses on subtlety and finesse, the Thunder Shadow aims for a more immersive typing experience with its stepped tactile bump.
Overall, both the KTT Mallo and Aflion Thunder Shadow switches have their unique qualities that cater to different preferences. If you prefer a gentle tactility and a subtle sound, the Mallo may be the way to go. On the other hand, if you enjoy a more pronounced tactile bump and invigorating typing feel, the Thunder Shadow could be the better choice for you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on personal preference and the type of typing experience you are looking to achieve.
Conclusion
In closing, when considering whether to choose the KTT Mallo tactile switch or the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preference and typing style. If you prefer a lighter typing experience with a subtle tactile feedback and a neutral sound profile, the Mallo may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you enjoy a slightly heavier typing feel with a more pronounced tactile bump and still prefer a neutral sound profile, the Thunder Shadow could be the perfect fit. Both switches offer a medium weight feel and a neutral sound signature, making them suitable for a wide range of typing environments. Ultimately, the decision between the Mallo and Thunder Shadow switches will depend on your individual preferences for typing comfort and feedback.
Mentioned in this article
