KTT Mallo vs. Bsun Tomcat
An in-depth look at the KTT Mallo and the Bsun Tomcat switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, personal preference plays a vital role in finding the ideal typing experience. The KTT Mallo switches are celebrated for their understated tactile feedback, offering a gentle bump that enhances typing without overwhelming the user. With a medium-light feel and a neutral sound signature, the Mallo provides a balanced experience that is well-suited for both casual typing and extended work sessions. In contrast, the Bsun Tomcat switches, characterized by their Ly stems, deliver a remarkably smooth linear experience that appeals to those who prioritize fluid keystrokes over tactile feedback. The resonant sound profile adds an engaging auditory layer to the typing experience. While the Mallo is perfect for typists seeking a subtle touch, the Tomcat caters to users looking for seamless keystrokes. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
54g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.95 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Extended spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Mallo and the Bsun Tomcat exhibit striking similarities when it comes to the top housing; both switches utilize polycarbonate. This material imparts a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile characterized by its clarity and resonance, allowing for a crisper auditory experience when typing. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate enhances aesthetic appeal, particularly in showcasing RGB lighting, making both switches visually striking and functionally effective in illuminated setups. The consistent use of polycarbonate in the top housing of both switches is likely to yield similar acoustic results, ensuring that users can expect a comparable sound quality when engaging with either switch.
While the top housing materials are identical, the KTT Mallo and Bsun Tomcat diverge in their choice of bottom housing. The Mallo employs nylon for its bottom housing, a classic material known for producing a deeper, fuller sound profile. In contrast, the Tomcat also features nylon for its bottom housing, ensuring that both switches exhibit the softer plastic qualities typical of nylon, which can absorb sound better than harder materials. This shared use of nylon guarantees that both switches will deliver a rounder and more muted sound when the key is pressed down, providing a satisfying bottom-out feel and sound that is a hallmark of a well-designed mechanical switch.
Ultimately, the differences in sound and feel of the KTT Mallo and Bsun Tomcat will depend on the interplay between their respective top and bottom housings. Since both switches employ the same materials in their constructions, the resonant properties of the polycarbonate top housing will shine through during lift-off sounds, while the nylon bottom housing will contribute to the keypress feedback and muted sound. This means that while the Mallo and Tomcat offer distinct user experiences, the results stemming from their design choices will be quite similar due to the harmonious combination of polycarbonate and nylon in both switches.
Weight
When comparing the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, we find notable differences in their actuation forces, while both exhibit a similar bottom out force. The Mallo's actuation force is unknown, but it has a bottom out force of 55 grams, classified as medium-light. In contrast, the Tomcat features an actuation force of 45 grams and a slightly lighter bottom out force of 54 grams. This makes the Tomcat a preferable option for those who favor a lighter typing experience, enhancing comfort during extended use, whether for work or gaming. On the other hand, the heavier nature of the Mallo, although its actuation force remains unclear, might appeal to users seeking a more substantial feel when typing. Ultimately, while the Tomcat's actuation and bottom out forces are both lighter, the Mallo's pronounced bottom out force can still provide tactile feedback that some users might appreciate.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, a clear distinction arises. The KTT Mallo has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Bsun Tomcat features a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm. This difference indicates that the Mallo offers a more pronounced key press, which may appeal to those who prefer a more tactile and deeper input experience. In contrast, the Tomcat's shorter 3.6 mm travel distance can provide a quicker response time, making it an attractive option for gamers and individuals who favor swift and responsive keystrokes. Therefore, if you are looking for a hearty depth in your keypress, the Mallo is the better choice, while the Tomcat caters to those who prioritize speed and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.
The Bsun Tomcat comes in at $2.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When discussing the sound profiles of the KTT Mallo and Bsun Tomcat switches, the Mallo is characterized by its neutral and subdued qualities. This means that the sound it produces is neither overly loud nor silent, striking a balance that caters well to both beginners and experienced typists across various settings, such as home and work environments. The Mallo allows for a pleasant typing experience without overwhelming the user or those nearby with auditory distractions. In contrast, the sound profile of the Tomcat switches is described as resonant, though specific details regarding its intensity and nature are not provided. Given that sound experiences can greatly depend on the keyboard build, keycap material, and personal preferences, one might find the Tomcat's sound enjoyable in its own way, even if it's more pronounced than the Mallo.
In terms of feel, the KTT Mallo switches present a feathery, mild, and subtly stepped typing experience. Their light actuation force promotes comfort during prolonged use, minimizing finger fatigue—ideal for gamers, students, or anyone who types extensively. The tactile feedback, while noticeable, is not overpowering, making it friendly for users who favor a soft touch without sacrificing responsiveness. On the other hand, the Bsun Tomcat's feel is unspecified, leaving some ambiguity about how it might compare. Without detailed descriptors for the Tomcat, we cannot discuss its tactile feedback or actuation force, and thus the experience of typing on it remains less clear than with the Mallo.
Considering both switches collectively, the KTT Mallo clearly emphasizes a gentle and balanced typing experience, with a focus on tactile feedback and a neutral sound signature that suits a variety of environments. The Tomcat, while described as smooth and possessing a resonant sound, lacks detail in tactile feedback and feel, which would be crucial for making a comprehensive comparison. Therefore, while the Mallo provides an approachable and versatile option, the Tomcat's unique sound profile may appeal to those looking for something more pronounced, pending further exploration of its feel characteristics. A choice between the two would ultimately depend on personal preferences regarding sound and typing sensation.
Conclusion
To conclude, when choosing between the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, consider your typing preferences and environment. If you appreciate a gentle tactile feedback while typing without overwhelming your senses, the KTT Mallo is an excellent choice. Its medium-light actuation force of 55 grams ensures a comfortable typing experience, making it ideal for long sessions at work or school where maintaining focus is crucial. Additionally, the Mallo's neutral and subdued sound profile allows it to blend well in shared spaces without being intrusive. On the other hand, if you're seeking a smooth, linear typing experience with a touch of character, the Bsun Tomcat might be more appealing. With its slightly lower actuation force of 54 grams, it promises a silky-smooth keystroke, perfect for gaming or fast-paced typing where speed and fluidity are priorities. Ultimately, your choice will depend on whether you prefer the tactile feedback of the Mallo or the seamless motion of the Tomcat, so reflect on your typing habits and environment to make the best decision.