KTT Mallo vs. Bsun Tuzi (Bunny)
An in-depth look at the KTT Mallo and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, it all comes down to personal preferences. The Mallo switch offers a gentle tactility that provides subtle feedback without being overwhelming, making it a great choice for those who prefer a balanced typing experience. On the other hand, the Tuzi switch provides a refined typing experience with a combination of clack and smoothness, catering to those who enjoy a more distinct and high-pitched typing sound. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
42g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Mallo and the Tuzi (Bunny) share many similarities in terms of sound profile and aesthetics. Both switches use polycarbonate for the top housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which creates a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that utilize RGB lighting. On the other hand, both switches use nylon for the bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, leading to a duller and rounder sound.
Despite their similarities, there are differences in how the housing materials of the Mallo and the Tuzi (Bunny) affect the typing experience. The bottom housing material has a greater impact on the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, as it absorbs more sound and creates a deeper tone. This means that typing on switches with a nylon bottom housing will result in a more muted and rounded sound compared to switches with a polycarbonate bottom housing. On the other hand, the top housing material has a greater impact on the sound when a key is released. With polycarbonate top housing, the sound is crisper and higher-pitched, while nylon top housing will produce a softer and fuller sound.
In conclusion, while both the Mallo and the Tuzi (Bunny) utilize polycarbonate for the top housing and nylon for the bottom housing, the distribution of these materials affects the overall sound profile and feel of the switches differently. The choice between the two housing materials ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of sound profile, feel, and aesthetics. Whether you prefer a sharper, crisper sound with polycarbonate or a deeper, fuller sound with nylon, both switches offer unique typing experiences that cater to individual preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, it is evident that the Tuzi (Bunny) switch is lighter in terms of both actuation and bottom out forces. The Mallo switch has a bottom out force of 55 grams, which is considered medium-light, while the Tuzi (Bunny) switch has a lower actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 42 grams, making it even lighter. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Tuzi (Bunny) switch would be the ideal choice. However, for individuals who enjoy a more substantial typing feel, the Mallo switch may be more suitable. Ultimately, selecting the appropriate force for a switch depends on personal preference and typing style.
Travel distance
In terms of travel distance, the KTT Mallo tactile switch has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch with a travel distance of 3.6 mm. Both switches fall within the realm of traditional travel distances, with the Mallo being slightly on the longer end and the Tuzi on the shorter end. Gamers may prefer the Tuzi for its shorter travel distance, which can result in faster response times during gameplay. On the other hand, those who prefer a more substantial feel when typing or gaming may opt for the Mallo with its longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between these switches comes down to personal preference and whether you prefer a shorter, quicker press or a longer, more deliberate press.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.
The Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Tuzi (Bunny) for $3.49.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Mallo switch is known for its neutral and subdued sound profile, making it suitable for a wide range of users in various environments. On the other hand, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) switch is described as clacky and high-pitched, providing a sharp and crisp sound when pressed. The choice between the two would ultimately depend on personal preference, with the Mallo offering a more versatile option while the Tuzi delivers a more distinct and pronounced auditory feedback.
When it comes to feel, the Mallo switch is characterized by its feathery and mild typing experience, offering a light actuation force that reduces finger fatigue and provides comfort for extended typing sessions. It also features a subtle tactile feedback that enhances the typing experience without being overwhelming. In contrast, the Tuzi (Bunny) switch is described as silky, providing an exceptionally smooth typing feel that minimizes resistance when pressing and releasing keys. This difference in feel highlights the diverse tactile experiences that each switch offers, appealing to different preferences in typing sensation.
Considering the subjective qualities of the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, it is evident that they offer distinct sound and feel profiles to cater to varying user preferences. While the Mallo excels in providing a balanced and versatile typing experience with its neutral sound and feathery feel, the Tuzi stands out for its clacky sound and silky smooth typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience, ensuring that users can find a switch that suits their specific needs and preferences.
Conclusion
In closing, when considering whether to choose the KTT Mallo tactile switch or the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preference and typing style. If you prefer a medium-light typing feel with gentle tactility and a neutral sound profile, the Mallo may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a light touch with a smooth typing experience and a clacky, high-pitched sound, the Tuzi (Bunny) switch might be more to your liking. Remember to consider factors such as actuation force, sound profile, and typing feel to determine which switch will best suit your needs and enhance your overall typing experience. Ultimately, the decision is yours to make based on what feels most comfortable and enjoyable for you.
Mentioned in this article
