KTT Mallo vs. Aflion Windy Shadow
An in-depth look at the KTT Mallo and the Aflion Windy Shadow switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Mallo and the Aflion Windy Shadow offer unique experiences catering to different preferences. The KTT Mallo is praised for its subtle tactility and gentle typing feel, making it a versatile choice for typists looking for a balanced typing experience. On the other hand, the Aflion Windy Shadow boasts a neutral sound profile and a distinctive bounce from its extended spring, providing a smooth and comfortable typing experience. While the Mallo is characterized by its feathery and subdued feel, the Windy Shadow is known for its low-pitched sound and mild typing experience. Both switches have their own strengths, and choosing between them ultimately depends on personal preference. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
19.7mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
The KTT Mallo and the Aflion Windy Shadow both use polycarbonate for their top housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This material is known for being relatively stiff, leading to a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that incorporate RGB lighting. However, the similarities in polycarbonate usage between the two switches suggest that users can expect similar sound profiles when typing on them.
In terms of the bottom housing, both the Mallo and the Windy Shadow use nylon, a classic switch housing material that produces a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon is softer compared to polycarbonate, absorbing more sound and creating a duller and rounder sound. This difference in material for the bottom housing can impact the overall typing experience, as the bottom-out sound and feel will be influenced by the qualities of the bottom housing material.
It is important to note that the split between top and bottom housing materials can affect how the sound and feel of the switches are perceived when typing. The bottom housing plays a more significant role in the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing has a greater impact on the sound when releasing a key. Users may find that the combination of polycarbonate and nylon in the KTT Mallo and the Aflion Windy Shadow provides a balanced and unique typing experience that caters to different preferences in sound and feel.
Weight
In comparing the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Aflion Windy Shadow linear switch, both switches have the same bottom out force of 55 grams, making them medium-light in terms of resistance. However, the actuation force of the Mallo is not specified, while the Windy Shadow also has an unknown actuation force. In terms of weight, some users may prefer a lighter actuation force for extended typing sessions or gaming, while others may prefer a heavier force for a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, without knowing the exact actuation force of either switch, it is difficult to determine which one is lighter or heavier in comparison. Both switches may provide similar results depending on individual preferences for typing feel and resistance.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Aflion Windy Shadow linear switch, it is clear that the Mallo has a longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the Windy Shadow's 3.5 mm. The Mallo's 4.0mm travel distance provides a more traditional feel, while the Windy Shadow's 3.5 mm is slightly shorter, making it ideal for those looking for a faster response time, such as gamers. Those who prefer a more hearty depth in their keystrokes may lean towards the Mallo due to its longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the specific needs of the user.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.
The Aflion Windy Shadow has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Windy Shadow for $3.91.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Mallo switch offers a subtle and neutral sound profile that is versatile for various typing environments. On the other hand, the Aflion Windy Shadow switch provides a low-pitched and neutral sound that is more bass-heavy and mellow compared to the Mallo. Both switches are suitable for most intents and purposes, whether for beginner or advanced typists, and whether used at home or work. The sound of a switch is also influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.
Moving on to the feel, the KTT Mallo switch is known for its feathery and subtle typing experience, with a light actuation force that reduces finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. It also offers a mild and stepped feel, providing a gentle typing experience that is approachable to most users. Meanwhile, the Aflion Windy Shadow switch offers a mild typing experience, falling within a safe middle-ground zone for sound and feel. Both switches provide a comfortable typing experience, with the Mallo offering a slightly lighter touch and more subtle feedback compared to the Windy Shadow.
In conclusion, the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Aflion Windy Shadow linear switch both offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Mallo provides a subtle tactile feedback and a neutral sound profile, the Windy Shadow offers a mellow low-pitched sound and a comfortable typing experience. Depending on personal preference, typists can choose between the gentler and more subdued feel of the Mallo or the slightly firmer and more bass-heavy feel of the Windy Shadow. Ultimately, both switches are suitable for a wide range of typing needs and preferences, ensuring a pleasant typing experience for users.
Conclusion
To sum up, in choosing between the KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Aflion Windy Shadow linear switch, consider your typing preferences and environment. If you prefer a gentle tactile feedback and a versatile sound profile that neither dominates nor fades into the background, the Mallo may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you value a distinct bounce from an extended spring and a low-pitched sound profile, the Windy Shadow could be more suitable. Ultimately, both switches offer a comfortable medium-light typing experience, so it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences in terms of tactility and sound. Choose wisely based on what feels best for your typing style and environment.
Mentioned in this article
