KTT Mallo vs. Wuque Studio WS Morandi
An in-depth look at the KTT Mallo and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the KTT Mallo and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi mechanical keyboard switches, you are presented with two distinct options that cater to different preferences. The Mallo offers a gentle tactility that provides subtle feedback without being overpowering, making it a balanced choice for typists who appreciate finesse. On the other hand, the WS Morandi switches are focused on innovation and visual aesthetics, featuring ultra-smooth linear switches with a mesmerizing light diffusion effect. While the Mallo is described as 'feathery' and 'neutral', the WS Morandi is characterized as 'buttery' and 'silky'. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
60g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
18mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Mallo and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi, it is clear that they both offer unique sound profiles. The Mallo's polycarbonate top housing provides a sharper, higher-pitched sound, while the Morandi's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound. This difference in sound profile can greatly impact the overall typing experience and is a key consideration for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
When it comes to the bottom housing material, both switches offer interesting characteristics. The Mallo's nylon bottom housing produces a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition. On the other hand, the Morandi's POM bottom housing also contributes to a deeper sound profile, albeit with a more muted quality. Despite their differences, both materials offer a unique typing experience that caters to different preferences in sound and feel.
Overall, the choice between the KTT Mallo and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi ultimately comes down to personal preferences in sound profile. While the Mallo's polycarbonate top housing creates a clear and resonant sound, the Morandi's POM top housing offers a deeper and more muted sound. Similarly, the differences in bottom housing materials also play a role in shaping the overall typing experience. Whether one prefers a sharper, higher-pitched sound or a deeper, more muted sound, both switches offer distinct characteristics that cater to different preferences among mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
The KTT Mallo tactile switch and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch have differing actuation and bottom out forces. The Mallo has an actuation force of None grams, making it difficult to determine the exact force required to trigger a keystroke, while it has a bottom out force of 55 grams, which is considered medium-light. On the other hand, the WS Morandi has an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, both falling in the medium range. Those seeking a lighter typing experience may prefer the Mallo due to its lower bottom out force, allowing for extended typing without as much finger fatigue. In contrast, the WS Morandi offers a slightly heavier actuation force, providing a more substantial typing feel for those who prefer a bit more resistance in their keystrokes. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference and typing style.
Travel distance
The KTT Mallo tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, with the Mallo being on the longer side and the WS Morandi being slightly shorter. Gamers may prefer the WS Morandi for its faster response time due to the shorter travel distance. However, those who prefer a more substantial keypress may lean towards the Mallo with its slightly longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the specific needs of the user.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.
The Wuque Studio WS Morandi has an MSRP of $4.30 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Morandi for $3.90.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Mallo switch is best described as having a neutral and subdued profile, offering a moderate sound signature that is suitable for various environments. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Morandi switch is characterized by a low-pitched and slightly muted sound, providing a more bass-heavy and mellow tone when typing. Both switches offer a more subtle sound compared to other switches, making them suitable for shared spaces or environments where a quieter typing experience is preferred.
When it comes to feel, the KTT Mallo switch is known for its feathery and mild typing experience, with a gentle resistance that reduces finger fatigue and offers a comfortable typing sensation. Conversely, the Wuque Studio WS Morandi switch is described as buttery, creamy, and silky, providing a smooth and fluid keystroke experience with minimal resistance when pressing and releasing keys. Both switches offer a pleasant typing feel, with the Mallo focusing on a light and comfortable typing experience, while the Morandi emphasizes smoothness and uniformity in keystrokes.
Overall, the KTT Mallo and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi switches offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Mallo excels in providing a balanced and versatile typing experience with a neutral sound profile, while the Morandi stands out with its innovative design, smooth keystrokes, and slightly muted sound. Depending on personal preferences for sound and feel, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing styles and preferences. Whether choosing the Mallo for its subtle tactility and feathery feel, or selecting the Morandi for its ultra-smooth keystrokes and buttery sensation, newcomers to mechanical keyboard switches can expect a satisfying typing experience with either option.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the KTT Mallo tactile switch or the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your typing preferences and environment. If you value a gentle tactility with a medium-light typing feel and a neutral sound profile, the Mallo may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you enjoy ultra-smooth linear switches with a mesmerizing RGB visual effect, a slightly more muted sound profile, and a medium weight for a balanced typing experience, the WS Morandi could be the perfect fit. Consider factors such as actuation force, sound profile, and typing feel to determine which switch aligns best with your personal preferences and needs. Ultimately, the decision between the Mallo and the WS Morandi boils down to what you prioritize most in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
