United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron Mars vs. Wuque Studio WS Dash

An in-depth look at the Gateron Mars and the Wuque Studio WS Dash switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the Gateron Mars and Wuque Studio WS Dash each offer distinct characteristics that cater to different typing preferences. The Gateron Mars, known for its innovative POK stem design and housing crafted from a blend of Nylon and POM, is a linear switch celebrated for its smooth keystrokes and consistent feel, making it an excellent choice for gamers and typists who prioritize speed and accuracy without tactile feedback. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Dash switch, a Hall Effect variant, features a bright and clacky sound signature that not only adds auditory feedback but also delivers a silky smooth typing experience. The refined aesthetics of the WS Dash provide an appealing visual aspect to the typing experience, attracting users who appreciate both function and style. While the Mars excels in performance and reliability, the WS Dash shines in its unique sound profile and elegance. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

30g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

1.20 mm

Pre-travel

N/A

Total travel

3.60 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POK

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm double-staged spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Gateron Mars and the Wuque Studio WS Dash, distinct differences emerge that significantly influence their sound profiles and tactile experiences. The Gateron Mars features a nylon top housing, which is known for its softer texture compared to harder plastics. This softness allows the nylon to absorb more sound, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile characterized by a duller and rounder acoustics. In contrast, the WS Dash utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which is much stiffer and thus contributes to a sharper, higher-pitched sound. The use of polycarbonate not only enhances clarity and resonance but also allows for better diffusion of RGB lighting, given its translucency. Users aiming for a more muted and deep auditory experience might prefer the Mars, whereas those seeking crispness and brightness in their switch sounds might gravitate towards the WS Dash.

On the flip side, the bottom housing of the two switches offers another layer of comparison. The Gateron Mars sports a POM bottom housing, which creates a unique, muted sound profile that leans towards the deeper side. This deeper sound is particularly pronounced when the switch bottoms out, as POM is well-regarded for its pleasing acoustic properties. Conversely, the WS Dash features a nylon bottom housing, mirroring the material of its top housing but applied where it counts most during the tactile interaction. The nylon bottom contributes to a similarly deep and fuller sound profile, harmonizing with its upper counterpart. As such, while the Mars’s bottom housing leans into its unique character through the POM material, the WS Dash maintains sonic consistency with its nylon foundation, ensuring a cohesive auditory experience from bottom to top.

In summary, the diverging materials of the top and bottom housings in these switches significantly affect their overall auditory characteristics. While the Gateron Mars utilizes a softer nylon top and a distinct POM bottom to create a rich, deeper sound, the WS Dash combines a crisp polycarbonate top with a nylon bottom, achieving a balanced yet sharper auditory response. When considering that both switches split their sound qualities between their respective top and bottom housings, users can achieve different auditory outcomes based on their preferences. For instance, players keen on a layered depth in sound may find satisfaction in the Mars, while those who opt for precision and brightness in their keystrokes may enjoy the offerings of the WS Dash.

Weight

When comparing the Gateron Mars linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Dash hall effect switch, a notable difference emerges in their actuation forces. The Gateron Mars requires an actuation force of 45 grams, while the WS Dash is lighter at 30 grams, making it more suitable for users who prefer a keyboard that allows for extended typing sessions without fatigue. This lighter actuation force may appeal to office workers and gamers alike, offering a more effortless keystroke experience. In contrast, the Mars switch’s heavier actuation force appeals to those seeking a more substantial feedback feel during typing. However, the bottom out force of the Mars is unknown, while the WS Dash features a bottom out force of 55 grams, classified as medium-light. This means that while the WS Dash provides a more consistent typing experience from actuation to bottom out, the heavier bottom out force may be less forgiving for some users. In summary, the WS Dash is the lighter option, while the Gateron Mars is the heavier, catering to different preferences in typing feel and endurance.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the Gateron Mars linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Dash hall effect switch, the Gateron Mars has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the WS Dash measures slightly shorter at 3.5 mm. This makes the Mars switch the longer of the two options, providing a bit more depth in each keystroke. For gamers or users who prioritize responsiveness, the shorter travel distance of the WS Dash may be appealing, as it allows for quicker actuation. Conversely, those who prefer a more pronounced keypress might find the slightly longer travel distance of the Mars to be more satisfying. Ultimately, while both switches are designed for different preferences, the difference in travel distance may influence the feel and performance during use.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron Mars has an MSRP of $6.10 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mars for $5.50.

The Wuque Studio WS Dash comes in at $7.49 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Gateron Mars switches exhibit a unique auditory signature that lends itself to a smooth and muted performance. This quality makes them an excellent option for users seeking a quieter typing experience, suitable for office environments or shared spaces. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Dash hall effect switches famously produce a bright and clacky sound signature. This lively tonal quality can make typing feel more engaging and enhances the tactile feedback during use. Achieving a specific sound profile will also depend on other elements like the choice of keyboard and keycaps.

In terms of feel, the Mars switch offers a silky smooth keystroke that many users find appealing, particularly for lengthy typing sessions or gaming where seamless key presses are crucial. Its design, featuring a POK stem paired with a composite housing material, contributes to its pleasant responsiveness. Conversely, the WS Dash switches are also known for their silky smooth keystroke but add an element of refinement thanks to their hall effect mechanism. This technology often results in a consistent and stable feel, enhancing overall comfort and performance while typing.

In summary, the Gateron Mars and Wuque Studio WS Dash switches each bring distinct auditory and tactile experiences to the table. While the Mars is acclaimed for its subdued sound and smooth keystroke, the WS Dash captivates with its clacky sound and similarly smooth operation, both offering their unique benefits. Deciding between them will ultimately come down to personal preference in sound and the overall typing experience desired, making it essential to consider your specific needs when choosing a switch.

Conclusion

To sum up, the choice between the Gateron Mars linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Dash hall effect switch ultimately hinges on your personal typing preferences and intended use. If you’re seeking an incredibly smooth and innovative experience, the Gateron Mars, with its unique POK stem and Nylon-POM housing, may be the ideal choice for you. While specific bottom-out force measurements are unavailable, Gateron Mars is generally targeted towards those who appreciate a fluid and responsive keystroke, making it an excellent option for prolonged typing sessions or gaming without any tactile feedback distractions. In contrast, if you desire a switch that provides a medium-light keystroke with a distinct auditory feedback, the WS Dash could be your perfect match. The 55-gram bottom-out force offers a satisfying resistance that many typists prefer, and the bright, clacky sound signature paired with the silky smooth feel of the keystroke adds a touch of refinement and character. Therefore, if you focus on auditory pleasure combined with a light typing feel for tasks like typing, creative writing, or gaming, the WS Dash is likely to enhance your experience. Ultimately, your choice will depend on whether you prioritize a super smooth, unassuming linear action or a more audible, playful keystroke with a notable resistance.

Mentioned in this article