United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Miaowu vs. KTT Mint

An in-depth look at the KTT Miaowu and the KTT Mint switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the KTT Miaowu, a linear switch, to the KTT Mint, another linear switch, there are some distinct differences to consider. The Miaowu Switch is known for its enhanced stem stability and smoother keystroke action, thanks to the utilization of POK in its stem, standing out from switches with conventional POM stems. Categorized as 'Bouncy' and 'Clacky', the Miaowu offers a unique typing experience with a tactile feedback. On the other hand, the Mint switch is praised for its satisfyingly smooth linear feel, attributed to its long pole stem which provides a poppy thockiness while typing. Categorized as 'Low-pitched', 'Neutral', 'Mild', and 'Polished', the Mint switch offers a more subtle and polished typing experience. Each switch has its own strengths and characteristics that may appeal to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

53g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POK

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated

Spring

15mm spring

Housing materials

The KTT Miaowu and Mint both utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, resulting in a similar sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The stiffness of polycarbonate contributes to a clear and resonant sound, making it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. However, the difference lies in their bottom housing material. The Miaowu features a nylon bottom housing, which creates a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic that absorbs more sound. This results in a duller and rounder sound compared to the Mint's polycarbonate bottom housing.

The nylon bottom housing of the Miaowu offers a different typing experience compared to the Mint's polycarbonate bottom housing. While the top housings of both switches contribute to a sharper sound profile, the bottom housing plays a significant role in the overall sound and feel of typing on the switches. The softer nylon material of the Miaowu absorbs more sound, creating a deeper and fuller typing experience. In contrast, the Mint's polycarbonate bottom housing may provide a crisper and more resonant sound, impacting the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch.

In conclusion, while both the KTT Miaowu and Mint share the use of polycarbonate for their top housing, their choice of bottom housing material sets them apart in terms of sound profile and typing experience. The Miaowu's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound, thanks to its softer plastic absorbing more sound. On the other hand, the Mint's polycarbonate bottom housing may provide a crisper sound, impacting the overall typing experience differently. Ultimately, the combination of top and bottom housing materials plays a crucial role in determining the sound profile and feel of each switch.

Weight

When comparing the KTT Miaowu linear switch and the KTT Mint linear switch, it is evident that the Miaowu is lighter in both actuation force and bottom out force compared to the Mint. The Miaowu has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the Mint has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams. This means that the Miaowu provides a lighter typing experience overall. The actuation force determines the force required to trigger a keystroke, while the bottom out force measures pressing all the way down on the key. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience for longer typing sessions or gaming, the Miaowu would be the more suitable option. On the other hand, the Mint with slightly heavier forces might be preferred by those looking for a more substantial typing experience. Both switches provide a different feel due to their varying actuation and bottom out forces, allowing users to choose based on their personal preferences.

Travel distance

The travel distance of the KTT Miaowu linear switch is 3.5 mm, while the KTT Mint linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Mint switch has a longer travel distance compared to the Miaowu switch. The Miaowu switch provides a shorter travel distance, which can be beneficial for those looking for a quicker response time, such as gamers. On the other hand, the Mint switch offers a slightly deeper travel distance, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial key press feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and desired typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Miaowu has an MSRP of $4.32 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Miaowu for $3.71.

The KTT Mint comes in at $2.91 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT Miaowu linear switch is known for its clacky sound, producing a sharp and snappy noise when pressed. On the other hand, the KTT Mint linear switch offers a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, creating a more bass-heavy and mellow tone suitable for various usage scenarios. Both switches provide distinct auditory experiences that can be further shaped by factors such as the keyboard chassis and keycap material used.

Moving on to the feel of the switches, the KTT Miaowu linear switch is characterized by a bouncy sensation, offering a spring-like feedback that gives the keys a lively feel with rebound upon actuation. In contrast, the KTT Mint linear switch provides a mild and polished typing experience, featuring a gentle and smooth finish that offers reduced friction and a sleek key travel. These qualities make the Mint switch approachable to most users, as it offers a safe and middle-ground feel that is comfortable for extended typing sessions.

In conclusion, while the KTT Miaowu and KTT Mint linear switches offer different subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel, both switches deliver a unique and enjoyable typing experience. Whether you prefer a clacky and bouncy feel with the Miaowu switch or a low-pitched and polished sensation with the Mint switch, you can expect satisfying keystrokes with either option. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and overall typing experience.

Conclusion

In closing, when deciding between the KTT Miaowu linear switch and the KTT Mint linear switch, consider the key characteristics of each switch. If you prefer a lighter bottom out force and enjoy a bouncy and clacky typing experience, the Miaowu may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force, a mild and polished typing experience with a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, the Mint could be the switch that suits your preferences. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference in terms of typing feel and sound profile, so make sure to choose the switch that aligns best with your preferences and typing style.

Mentioned in this article