KTT MoonRosa vs. Gateron Oil King (V2)
An in-depth look at the KTT MoonRosa and the Gateron Oil King (V2) switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the KTT MoonRosa and the Gateron Oil King mechanical keyboard switches, both linear switches offer a smooth typing experience with unique characteristics. The MoonRosa is prized for its all-POM construction, providing a buttery smooth feel and neutral sound profile, perfect for those who prefer a mild, low-pitched, and easy-to-press switch. On the other hand, the Oil King stands out for its buttery smoothness and a sound profile reminiscent of snapping a dark chocolate bar, offering a low-pitched, creamy, silky, bassy, and polished typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Proprietary INK blend
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm spring
Spring
Color coated
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT MoonRosa and the Gateron Oil King exhibit notable differences in terms of sound profile. The MoonRosa's POM housing offers a deeper and more muted sound, while the Oil King's nylon housing provides a fuller and rounder sound. This contrast in sound profiles can significantly impact the typing experience, as the MoonRosa may offer a quieter and more subdued typing sound compared to the Oil King's potentially louder and more pronounced sound.
In terms of material composition, the MoonRosa's POM bottom housing and the Oil King's INK blend bottom housing further highlight the distinctions between the two switches. The POM housing of the MoonRosa continues to emphasize a deeper and muted sound profile, while the INK blend housing of the Oil King offers a more pointed and relatively high-pitched sound. This difference in sound characteristics can cater to individual preferences, with some users favoring the deeper and more subdued sound of the POM housing, while others may prefer the sharper and clackier sound of the INK blend housing.
Overall, while the top and bottom housings of the KTT MoonRosa and the Gateron Oil King may differ in material composition and sound profile, the two switches ultimately aim to provide a satisfying typing experience for users. Both switches offer unique sound profiles that can cater to a variety of preferences, whether one prefers a deeper and more muted sound or a sharper and clackier sound. Regardless of the differences in housing materials, users can expect a high-quality typing experience from both the MoonRosa and the Oil King, albeit with slight variations in sound and feel.
Weight
The actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Gateron Oil King linear switch differ significantly. The MoonRosa has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it a great option for those who prefer a lighter typing experience. On the other hand, the Oil King has a heavier actuation force of 55 grams and a bottom out force of 65 grams, providing a more substantial typing feel for those who enjoy a bit more resistance. The MoonRosa offers a lighter typing experience, ideal for extended typing sessions or gaming, while the Oil King provides a more solid and tactile typing feel. Both switches have their strengths depending on personal preference, but those looking for a lighter touch may prefer the MoonRosa, while those seeking a heavier push may lean towards the Oil King. Ultimately, selecting between the two will depend on individual typing preferences and the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
The KTT MoonRosa linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Gateron Oil King linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the MoonRosa has a slightly shorter travel distance compared to the Oil King. A 3.5 mm travel distance is considered on the shorter side, making it a good option for those seeking a faster response time, such as gamers. On the other hand, the 4 mm travel distance of the Oil King provides a bit more depth, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial key press feel. Both switches offer a different tactile experience due to their travel distances, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of how much depth and responsiveness you desire in a keyboard switch.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88, whereas the Gateron Oil King (V2) comes in at $6.50.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, both the KTT MoonRosa and Gateron Oil King linear switches are described as having a low-pitched sound profile. This means they offer a more bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to higher-pitched switches. The Oil King switch also adds a descriptor of being bassy, which provides a deeper and richer sound profile during key presses. It's important to note that the sound of a switch can be influenced by various factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.
When it comes to the feel of the switches, the MoonRosa switch is described as mild and easy-to-press, offering a gentle typing experience with minimal resistance during key presses. This makes typing effortless and comfortable, reducing finger fatigue during long typing sessions. On the other hand, the Gateron Oil King switch is described as creamy, silky, buttery, and polished. These descriptors highlight a smooth and fluid typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. Both switches aim to provide a seamless and uniform typing sensation, enhancing the overall typing feel.
In conclusion, both the KTT MoonRosa and Gateron Oil King linear switches offer a buttery smooth typing experience with low-pitched sound profiles. While the MoonRosa switch is described as mild and easy-to-press, providing a safe and approachable typing experience, the Oil King switch goes a step further with creamy, silky, buttery, and polished descriptors, offering an exceptionally smooth and refined typing experience. Ultimately, choosing between these two switches would depend on personal preference for sound profile and typing feel, but you can expect similar results in terms of overall typing satisfaction.
Conclusion
To wrap up, when deciding between the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Gateron Oil King linear switch, consider the factors that are most important to you. If you prefer a lighter bottom out force and a mild, easy-to-press typing experience with a low-pitched sound profile, the MoonRosa may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force and a creamy, silky, buttery typing experience with a low-pitched and bassy sound profile, the Oil King might be more suited to your preferences. Overall, both switches offer a smooth typing experience, but the differences in bottom out force and sound profile might help guide your decision on which switch is the right fit for your needs. Ultimately, the choice between the MoonRosa and Oil King switches comes down to personal preference and what qualities are most important to you in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
