KTT MoonRosa vs. Outemu Black
An in-depth look at the KTT MoonRosa and the Outemu Black switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT MoonRosa linear switch to the Outemu Black linear switch, one can observe some distinct differences in their characteristics. The MoonRosa switch stands out for its all-POM construction, offering a buttery smooth typing experience with a neutral sound signature. It is also classified as 'Mild', 'Low-pitched', and 'Easy-to-press', making it ideal for users who prefer a gentle and quiet typing experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Black switch lacks specific standout features but is known for its reliability and durability. While it does not have any particular categorizations, it is still a popular choice for those looking for a straightforward linear switch. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
65g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
82g
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Pre-travel
2.50 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The KTT MoonRosa's POM housing provides a deeper and more muted sound profile compared to the Outemu Black's polycarbonate housing, which creates a sharper and crisper sound. The POM material used in both the top and bottom housing of the MoonRosa contributes to a consistent sound profile that is unique and pleasing. On the other hand, the Black's combination of polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing creates a more varied sound experience, with the top housing producing a clearer and resonant sound while the bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound profile. Overall, the MoonRosa's POM housing tends to provide a more consistent and uniform sound experience, while the Black's mixed housing materials offer a wider range of sound profiles.
In terms of aesthetics, the MoonRosa's POM housing may not offer the same visual appeal as the Black's polycarbonate housing, especially when it comes to utilizing RGB lighting. The transparent nature of polycarbonate allows for better light transmission, making it ideal for showcasing RGB lighting effects. However, the MoonRosa's POM housing may appeal to those who prioritize sound quality over visual aesthetics, as it is known for creating a unique and pleasing sound profile. Additionally, the use of nylon in the Black's bottom housing may contribute to a duller and rounder sound, which can be preferred by some users for a more satisfying typing experience.
Despite their differences in housing materials, both the KTT MoonRosa and the Outemu Black offer high-quality sound profiles that cater to different preferences. The MoonRosa's consistent POM housing creates a deep and muted sound, while the Black's combination of polycarbonate and nylon housings provides a more varied sound experience. Whether you prefer a more uniform sound profile or enjoy the varied tones produced by different housing materials, both switches are designed to deliver satisfying typing experiences. Ultimately, the choice between the MoonRosa and the Black will depend on your individual preferences for sound, aesthetics, and typing feel.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Outemu Black linear switch, there is a noticeable difference in weight. The MoonRosa has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, providing a smooth and light typing experience. In contrast, the Outemu Black switch is heavier with an actuation force of 65 grams and a bottom out force of 82 grams, resulting in a more substantial and tactile feel while typing. For those who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing sessions, the MoonRosa would be the better choice. On the other hand, users who prefer a stronger push feel may find the Outemu Black switch more suitable for a more robust typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on individual preference for actuation force and bottom out force.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Outemu Black linear switch, we can see that the MoonRosa has a travel distance of 3.5 mm while the Black has a travel distance of 4 mm. This indicates that the Outemu Black has a longer travel distance compared to the MoonRosa. The traditional travel distance is typically around 4.0 mm, however, shorter distances have become more popular, especially among gamers looking for faster response times. If you prefer a shorter travel distance for quicker key presses, the MoonRosa would be the better option. On the other hand, if you prefer a more substantial keypress with a longer travel distance, the Outemu Black would be the preferred choice. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for typing or gaming experiences.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88, whereas the Outemu Black comes in at $3.10.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT MoonRosa linear switch is known for its low-pitched sound characteristic, providing a bass-heavy and mellow tone during typing. On the other hand, the Outemu Black linear switch's sound quality is not specified, so it is difficult to directly compare the two in this aspect. However, it is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the KTT MoonRosa linear switch is described as mild and easy-to-press, providing a gentle typing experience with minimal force required for key activation. This results in a smooth and effortless typing feel that can reduce finger fatigue during long typing sessions. Conversely, the Outemu Black linear switch's feel is unknown, making it challenging to make a direct comparison based on this aspect alone.
Overall, while the sound and feel qualities of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch have been detailed, information about the Outemu Black linear switch is limited. As a newcomer looking for a similar typing experience, opting for the MoonRosa switch may be a reliable choice due to its smooth and easy-to-press attributes. However, if the Outemu Black switch aligns with these qualities as well, you can expect to achieve comparable results in terms of sound and feel. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the specific typing experience you are looking to achieve.
Conclusion
In closing, if you are looking for a light and smooth typing experience with a low-pitched sound and easy-to-press keys, the KTT MoonRosa linear switch would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a heavier key with no specific sound or feel preferences, the Outemu Black linear switch might be more suited to your typing style. Ultimately, the decision between the MoonRosa and Black switches will depend on your personal preferences for key weight, sound profile, and typing feel. Consider these factors carefully before making your final decision on which switch to choose for your mechanical keyboard.
Mentioned in this article
