United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT MoonRosa vs. HMX Poro

An in-depth look at the KTT MoonRosa and the HMX Poro switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT MoonRosa and the HMX Poro both present compelling options that cater to different preferences within the linear switch category. The MoonRosa is renowned for its all-POM construction, providing a buttery smooth typing experience with a mild and low-pitched sound signature that allows for quiet operation, making it ideal for office environments or late-night gaming sessions. In contrast, the HMX Poro offers silky smooth keystrokes that are enhanced by meticulous lubrication for an effortless glide, coupled with a satisfyingly poppy and clacky sound profile due to its ultra-light actuation force. While the MoonRosa focuses on a smooth, muted experience, the HMX Poro brings a lively auditory feedback that some users find irresistible. Both switches are designed to optimize your typing experience, but they do so in remarkably different ways. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

37g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

45g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

3.70 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm spring

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

The KTT MoonRosa and HMX Poro switches utilize distinct housing materials that significantly influence their sound profiles and typing experiences. The MoonRosa features POM (Polyoxymethylene) for both its top and bottom housings, which is known for creating an appealing yet muted sound. This POM material contributes to a deeper sound experience, enhancing the dampening effect when the switch is engaged. In contrast, the HMX Poro uses nylon for its top and bottom housings, a material characterized by its classic reputation in the keyboard community. Nylon's softer composition allows it to absorb sound more effectively, resulting in a fuller and more rounded auditory experience while typing, similar to that of the MoonRosa but with a slightly different tonal quality.

Both switches aim to create a rich sound profile by employing softer plastics in their construction. The POM of the MoonRosa and the nylon of the Poro serve similar functions in producing deeper auditory effects, although their sound characteristics are distinct. Users may notice that while the POM creates a unique sound that can be relatively muted, the nylon produces a somewhat more resonant and robust experience. This difference can affect the perception of sound when typing. For instance, the MoonRosa's POM housing might offer a cleaner feel upon release, whereas the Poro's nylon could provide a more pronounced tonal quality due to its inherency to absorb and dissipate sound.

In practical usage, the interplay between the top and bottom housing materials in both switches means that the overall sound and feel during typing are influenced by the combined properties. The MoonRosa's POM bottom housing will project a distinctively muted feel and sound at bottom-out, while the nylon bottom housing of the Poro will yield a rounder sound profile with a more resonant feel. Ultimately, even though both switch types seek to deliver deeper sound experiences with softer housing materials, the user will discern subtle differences in auditory feedback and tactile response that stem from the nuances in the housing materials employed.

Weight

The KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch both offer light typing experiences, but they differ in terms of actuation and bottom out forces. The MoonRosa has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it the lighter option overall. In contrast, the Poro switch features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, which is slightly heavier. While both switches provide a smooth typing experience, those who prefer a softer touch during long typing sessions or gaming might lean towards the MoonRosa. Conversely, users who enjoy a more substantial feel with a stronger push should consider the Poro for its heavier actuation and bottoming out forces. Overall, the choice between these switches comes down to individual preference for weight and typing feel.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch, the MoonRosa features a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Poro has a slightly longer travel distance of 3.7 mm. This difference of 0.2 mm highlights that the MoonRosa is the shorter option, which may appeal to those seeking faster response times, especially gamers who benefit from quicker actuation. On the other hand, the Poro, with its longer travel distance, may provide a more substantial feel for those who prefer a deeper key press. Ultimately, users looking for rapidity in their keystrokes may favor the MoonRosa, whereas those who appreciate a richer, more pronounced typing experience might be inclined towards the Poro.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Poro has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Poro for $2.99.

The KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the KTT MoonRosa switch presents a low-pitched, bass-heavy tone that creates a mellower auditory experience during typing. This subdued sound profile is often appreciated for its less intrusive nature, allowing for a more focused work environment. The HMX Poro switch, on the other hand, is characterized by an unspecified clacky sound, indicating a potentially brighter and more pronounced auditory feedback. However, it’s important to note that the overall sound quality can be heavily influenced by the choice of keyboard plate, case, and keycap materials. Therefore, while the MoonRosa will typically provide a softer auditory experience, the Poro may deliver more pronounced sounds if favored, creating a distinct typing environment depending on their respective setups.

In terms of feel, the MoonRosa switch shines with its mild and easy-to-press nature. It provides a gentle resistance that makes the typing experience effortless, catering well to users who prefer a lighter touch. This can be particularly beneficial during long typing sessions where finger fatigue might be a concern. The switch forms a balanced typing experience that is approachable for most users. The HMX Poro's feel qualities are currently unknown, leaving some ambiguity regarding its tactile characteristics. If the Poro also offers a smooth actuation as suggested, it may align more closely in feel with the MoonRosa, promoting a similarly comfortable typing experience.

In conclusion, while both the KTT MoonRosa and HMX Poro linear switches promise smooth keystrokes, they diverge in their auditory profiles and tactile feedback. The MoonRosa is preferable for those seeking a mellow sound and an easy-on-the-fingers feel, while the Poro may attract users looking for a more clacky experience, though its specific tactile details remain undisclosed. Users will find satisfaction in both options, depending on their preferences for sound and feel, and those who prioritize a calm typing atmosphere may lean toward the MoonRosa, whereas others may enjoy the potentially brighter auditory feedback of the Poro if it aligns in comfort.

Conclusion

To sum up, when it comes to choosing between the KTT MoonRosa and the HMX Poro linear switches, your decision should be guided by your typing preferences and the experience you desire. If you value a lighter actuation force and enjoy a buttery smooth typing experience with a low-pitched, mellow sound, the MoonRosa switch may be the right choice for you. It’s particularly well-suited for long typing sessions, as its mild characteristics and easy-to-press nature reduce finger fatigue, making it ideal for both casual typing and professional work. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch that offers a bit more auditory satisfaction along with an effortless glide, the HMX Poro may be more appealing. While it has a slightly heavier bottom-out force, its meticulously lubricated design provides a silky smooth keystroke with a satisfyingly poppy and clacky sound profile that can enhance your gaming or fast-paced typing experiences. Ultimately, the choice hinges on whether you prioritize a more neutral and soft typing feel or a switch that combines smoothness with a bit more auditory feedback.

Mentioned in this article