KTT MoonRosa vs. Jwick Taro
An in-depth look at the KTT MoonRosa and the Jwick Taro switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the KTT MoonRosa and the Jwick Taro. The MoonRosa is a linear switch known for its all-POM construction, providing a buttery smooth typing experience with a neutral sound signature. It is categorized as 'Mild', 'Low-pitched', and 'Easy-to-press'. On the other hand, the Taro is a tactile switch offering a cozy typing experience with a snappy, medium-level of tactility and crisp clacks. It is categorized as 'Neutral', 'Buttery', and 'Stepped'. While the MoonRosa offers a smooth and easy-to-press typing experience, the Taro provides a tactile feedback for those who prefer a bit of resistance while typing. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT MoonRosa and the Jwick Taro exhibit distinct characteristics that affect the sound profiles of the switches. The MoonRosa's POM top housing creates a deep and muted sound, while the Taro's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper and crisper sound. The use of polycarbonate in the Taro results in a more resonant sound due to its stiffness, which is ideal for those looking for a clear and high-pitched sound. In contrast, the POM bottom housing of the MoonRosa contributes to a pleasing and unique sound profile that is deeper and more muted, while the nylon bottom housing of the Taro creates a fuller and rounder sound by absorbing more sound.
While the MoonRosa and Taro have different housing materials for their top and bottom housings, the qualities they bring to the switches are split between the two components. The bottom housing of a switch, such as the nylon bottom housing of the Taro or the POM bottom housing of the MoonRosa, has a significant impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when the key is pressed down. On the other hand, the top housing, whether it be POM or polycarbonate, influences the sound when the key is released. This split in housing materials allows for a diverse sound experience that caters to different preferences.
In terms of aesthetics, the choice between POM and polycarbonate for the top housing can also affect the look of the switch, especially if RGB lighting is involved. Polycarbonate, with its transparency, is ideal for showcasing RGB lighting effects, making it a popular choice for those looking to enhance the visual appeal of their keyboard setup. However, the POM top housing of the MoonRosa offers a unique sound profile that may appeal to users more interested in the auditory experience of typing. Ultimately, the housing materials of the MoonRosa and Taro offer users a variety of options to customize their typing experience based on sound preferences and aesthetic considerations.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, it is evident that the MoonRosa is lighter in both categories. The MoonRosa has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, while the Taro has an actuation force of None grams and a bottom out force of 67 grams, making it medium-heavy. For those who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing or gaming sessions, the MoonRosa would be the ideal choice. On the other hand, individuals looking for a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the Taro with its heavier bottom out force. Both switches offer different typing experiences based on their actuation and bottom out forces, catering to a variety of preference and usage scenarios.
Travel distance
The KTT MoonRosa linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Jwick Taro tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.7 mm. Both switches fall within the shorter travel distance range, making them ideal for gamers looking for faster response times. The MoonRosa is slightly shorter than the Taro, but the difference is minimal and may not be noticeable to all users. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for the feel of the key press - a slightly shorter travel distance with the MoonRosa or a slightly longer travel distance with the Taro. Both switches will provide a similar level of performance, with the main difference being in the tactile feedback experienced during use.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jwick Taro has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Taro for $4.25.
The KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT MoonRosa linear switch offers a low-pitched sound profile, providing a more bass-heavy and mellow tone during typing. On the other hand, the Jwick Taro tactile switch is noted for its neutral sound signature, offering a moderate actuation force requirement and sound profile suitable for various typing purposes. The sound produced by each switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard's construction and keycaps used.
Moving on to feel, the KTT MoonRosa switch is described as mild and easy-to-press, providing a gentle and effortless typing experience with minimal force required for key presses. Conversely, the Jwick Taro tactile switch offers a buttery and stepped feel, delivering a smooth and fluid keystroke sensation with a mild and two-staged tactile feedback. Both switches aim to offer a comfortable typing experience, with the MoonRosa being more approachable and the Taro providing a unique stepped tactile sensation.
Overall, the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch offer distinct subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the MoonRosa provides a low-pitched sound and mild, easy-to-press feel, the Taro offers a neutral sound profile and a buttery, stepped tactile experience. Depending on individual preferences and typing styles, users can choose between the two switches to achieve their desired typing experience. Additionally, both switches are designed to enhance the overall typing experience with their unique features, catering to a wide range of users from beginners to advanced mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you are looking for a light and easy-to-press switch with a low-pitched sound and a mild typing experience, the KTT MoonRosa linear switch would be a great option for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy switch with a snappy and buttery feel, accompanied by a neutral sound profile, the Jwick Taro tactile switch would be more suitable for your typing preferences. Ultimately, your choice between the MoonRosa and Taro switches will depend on whether you prioritize a smooth linear experience or a tactile typing sensation. Consider your typing style and preferences before making your decision.
Mentioned in this article
