KTT MoonRosa vs. Bsun Tomcat

Overview

When it comes to selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, enthusiasts often seek options that align with their specific preferences for typing feel and sound. The KTT MoonRosa and Bsun Tomcat are two noteworthy linear switches that cater to different tastes while offering their unique advantages. The MoonRosa stands out with its entirely POM construction, delivering an exceptionally smooth typing experience alongside a neutral sound profile, making it an excellent choice for users who appreciate a silent yet responsive performance. Conversely, the Bsun Tomcat switches feature Ly stems that promise a similarly smooth keystroke but introduce a resonant sound profile that can enhance the overall typing experience for those who enjoy a bit more auditory feedback. While both switches fall under the linear category and deliver excellent smoothness, their differing sound characteristics and construction materials may sway a typist’s preference. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.

By the numbers

KTT MoonRosa Linear

Bsun Tomcat Linear

$4.88 per 10

$2.99 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the KTT MoonRosa and the Bsun Tomcat, there are notable differences in their top housing compositions that greatly influence their acoustic characteristics. The MoonRosa features a POM (Polyoxymethylene) top housing, which contributes to a sound profile that is notably deeper and more muted. This muted sound provides an appealing auditory response, particularly for those who prefer a less harsh keyboard experience. In contrast, the Tomcat uses a polycarbonate top housing, known for delivering a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The inherent stiffness of polycarbonate enables a clearer and more resonant sound, making it ideal for users who enjoy a more audibly striking click with RGB lighting effects being particularly visually accentuated due to the material's translucency. Thus, while both switches are designed to enhance typing experiences, the MoonRosa leans towards a subdued acoustic signature, while the Tomcat embraces a more vibrant and lively sound.

Examining the bottom housings, the MoonRosa is equipped with a POM material, while the Tomcat features a nylon bottom housing. Both POM and nylon contribute to a deeper sound profile, but they do so in different ways. The POM material used in the MoonRosa is known for producing a uniquely pleasing tone that is rounded and fairly muted. On the other hand, nylon, as employed in the Tomcat, is a traditional switch housing material that yields a fuller sound by absorbing more sound due to its softer composition. This characteristic aids in creating what can be described as a duller and rounder audio experience upon bottoming out on the switches. Although both materials lean towards creating deeper soundscapes, the nuances in softness and sound absorption between POM and nylon result in distinct auditory experiences.

While the MoonRosa and the Tomcat employ different materials for their top and bottom housings, the interplay between these materials influences the overall sound and feel of each switch. For instance, while the MoonRosa's combination of POM top and bottom creates a softer and deeper acoustic profile, the Tomcat’s polycarbonate top adds a sharpness to the auditory experience that is complemented by the fuller sound offered by its nylon bottom. If both switches were to be compared in terms of sound quality, we could expect that the softer sound from the MoonRosa would provide a quieter, more understated experience, while the Tomcat would excel in delivering a clear and resonant sound. Ultimately, the distinctions and synergies between the housing materials illustrate how different combinations can lead to a unique and tailored typing experience, catering to varying preferences among keyboard enthusiasts.

Weight

The KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch present notable differences in both actuation and bottom out forces. The MoonRosa features a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it ideal for prolonged typing sessions and more effortless keystrokes. In contrast, the Tomcat has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 54 grams, which could appeal to users looking for a more tactile and substantial typing experience. Consequently, the MoonRosa is the lighter option, while the Tomcat can be classified as medium-light and offers a more pronounced resistance. If one prefers a smoother typing experience with less effort, the MoonRosa would be the preferable choice, whereas the Tomcat may be better suited for those who desire a firmer key press.

Travel distance

The KTT MoonRosa linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Bsun Tomcat linear switch features a slightly greater travel distance of 3.6 mm. This means that the Tomcat switch is the longer option, providing an extra 0.1 mm of travel compared to the MoonRosa. For users who prioritize responsiveness, the MoonRosa's shorter distance may be more appealing, as it can facilitate quicker key presses ideal for gaming. On the other hand, some users might prefer the Tomcat's longer travel for a deeper and more satisfying tactile experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences regarding travel distance and responsiveness.

Price comparison

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT MoonRosa switch stands out with a low-pitched sound profile, delivering a mellow and bass-heavy tone that creates a pleasant auditory experience while typing. This type of sound tends to be less intrusive, making it suitable for both quiet office environments and personal spaces where tranquility is desired. On the other hand, the specifics of the sound profile of the Bsun Tomcat switch remain unknown, but it's worth noting that the overall sound of mechanical switches can vary significantly based on the keyboard's build, keycap material, and even typing style. Therefore, while the MoonRosa’s low-pitched character provides a clear auditory expectation, you might find different nuances with the Tomcat depending on the setup.

When it comes to feel, the MoonRosa switch offers a mild, gentle experience characterized by easy actuation. This results in a typing experience that is approachable even for those new to mechanical keyboards, as the light resistance minimizes finger fatigue, making it comfortable to type for extended periods. The buttery smoothness associated with its all-POM construction further enhances this effect, allowing for decisive and effortless key presses. In contrast, the details regarding the tactile feel of the Tomcat switch are unknown, which leaves a gap in comparing their experiential qualities. However, the general consensus is that smooth switches like the Tomcat are intended to deliver a similarly agreeable typing experience.

In conclusion, the KTT MoonRosa switch is recognized for its smooth feel, mild typing characteristics, and neutral, low-pitched sound, making it an excellent choice for someone seeking a pleasant and fatigue-free typing experience. The Bsun Tomcat switch, while lacking detailed descriptions in both sound and feel, likely aims for a smooth typing experience as well, particularly with its Ly stems. If you prefer a mild, easy-to-press structure, the MoonRosa is a reliable choice, while the Tomcat's exact qualities remain a mystery, but there’s potential for similar satisfaction if smoothness is prioritized. Ultimately, the choice between these switches may come down to personal preference with sound and the feel that each brand claims to offer.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, you should consider your typing preferences and the environment in which you use your keyboard. If you favor a lighter key press and buttery smooth feedback, especially during long typing sessions, the MoonRosa, with its 45-gram bottom-out force, provides an effortless and comfortable experience. Its low-pitched sound profile and mild feel are excellent for those who prefer a gentler typing experience that won't overwhelm your senses or draw attention in quieter settings. On the other hand, if you're looking for a bit more resistance and enjoy a resonant sound profile, the Tomcat with its 54-gram bottom-out force may be the better choice for you. While it still offers a smooth typing experience, its slightly firmer actuation may give you the feedback you desire without sacrificing comfort, making it suitable for both typing and gaming. Ultimately, your decision should reflect your own ergonomic needs and the type of auditory feedback you prefer while using your mechanical keyboard.

Mentioned in this article

KTT MoonRosa Linear

$4.88 per 10

Learn more

Bsun Tomcat Linear

$2.99 per 10

Learn more