Cherry MX Red vs. Gateron Oil King (V2)
An in-depth look at the Cherry MX Red and the Gateron Oil King (V2) switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When looking for a mechanical keyboard switch, two popular options to consider are the Cherry MX Red and the Gateron Oil King. The Cherry MX Red is a classic linear switch known for its slightly heftier feel and deeper sound profile, providing a robust typing experience that combines responsiveness with a satisfying auditory depth. On the other hand, the Gateron Oil King stands out for its buttery smoothness and a sound profile reminiscent of snapping dark chocolate. While the MX Red is categorized as 'Thocky', 'Low-pitched', and 'Textured', the Oil King is known for being 'Low-pitched', 'Creamy', 'Silky', 'Bassy', 'Buttery', and 'Polished'. Deciding between these switches will ultimately come down to personal preference and specific needs; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
pom
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Proprietary INK blend
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Color coated
Housing materials
The Cherry MX Red and Gateron Oil King both feature nylon top housing, which creates a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition. This results in a duller and rounder sound, making typing on these switches a more satisfying experience. However, the MX Red's nylon bottom housing continues this trend, enhancing the overall sound profile of the switch. On the other hand, the Oil King utilizes a proprietary INK blend bottom housing, which adds a pointed and relatively high-pitched sound to the switch, described as "clacky."
While both switches share a nylon top housing material, the Cherry MX Red and Gateron Oil King differ in their bottom housing composition. The MX Red's nylon bottom housing contributes to the overall deep and full sound profile, absorbing more sound than harder plastics. In contrast, the Oil King's INK blend bottom housing adds a unique high-pitched sound that is not overly sharp, creating a distinct clacky sound. Despite the differences in bottom housing materials, both switches aim to enhance the typing experience with their specific sound profiles.
Ultimately, the choice between the Cherry MX Red and Gateron Oil King comes down to personal preference in sound profile. While both switches utilize nylon top housing for a deeper and fuller sound, the distinct bottom housing materials set them apart in terms of sound characteristics. Whether you prefer the duller and rounder sound of the MX Red or the pointed and high-pitched sound of the Oil King, both switches offer a unique typing experience that is sure to enhance your overall satisfaction.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Cherry MX Red linear switch and the Gateron Oil King linear switch, it is evident that the Oil King has a heavier actuation force of 55 grams compared to the MX Red's lighter 45 grams. Additionally, the Oil King has a bottom out force of 65 grams, which is considered medium-heavy, while the MX Red's bottom out force is unknown. This means that the Oil King provides a more substantial typing experience with a stronger push feel, which some users may prefer for a more tactile typing experience. On the other hand, the MX Red's lighter actuation force may be preferred by those who value typing for extended periods of time without experiencing fatigue. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style.
Travel distance
The travel distance of both the Cherry MX Red linear switch and the Gateron Oil King linear switch is 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. When comparing them, both switches offer a consistent and smooth keystroke experience due to their linear design. This means that regardless of which switch is chosen, users can expect a similar level of key travel distance while typing or gaming. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches may come down to other factors such as actuation force or overall feel, as the travel distance is identical for both the Cherry MX Red and Gateron Oil King linear switches.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Cherry MX Red has an MSRP of $5.90 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Red for $4.00.
The Gateron Oil King (V2) comes in at $6.50 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Cherry MX Red switch offers a thocky and low-pitched sound profile, providing a deep and satisfying auditory experience. On the other hand, the Gateron Oil King switch produces a low-pitched and bassy sound, resembling the rich tones of dark chocolate snapping. Both switches offer a deep and rich sound profile, with slight differences in the specific characteristics of the sound. Ultimately, the choice between the two would come down to personal preference and how it complements your overall keyboard setup.
When it comes to feel, the Cherry MX Red switch is described as having a textured feel, providing some noticeable friction when pressed. In contrast, the Gateron Oil King switch is often described as creamy, silky, buttery, and polished, offering an exceptionally smooth and fluid typing experience. The Oil King switch's lubricant application and specific materials contribute to a glide-like sensation when typing, whereas the MX Red switch may offer a more tactile feedback due to its textured nature. Depending on whether you prefer a smoother or slightly textured typing experience, you may lean towards one switch over the other.
In conclusion, both the Cherry MX Red and Gateron Oil King linear switches offer high-quality options for a satisfying typing experience. While the MX Red switch provides a slightly heftier feel and a thocky sound, the Oil King switch delivers a buttery smoothness and a rich, bassy sound profile. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on personal preference, with both options offering a premium typing experience with their own unique characteristics. If you enjoy a deep and satisfying auditory experience with a slightly textured feel, the MX Red switch may be the way to go. Conversely, if you prefer a smooth and buttery typing experience with a luxurious sound profile, the Gateron Oil King switch could be the ideal choice for you.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the Cherry MX Red linear switch and the Gateron Oil King linear switch, consider the following factors. If you prefer a slightly heftier feel and deeper sound profile, along with a satisfying auditory depth, the MX Red may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you value buttery smoothness in your typing experience with a sound profile reminiscent of a dark chocolate bar snapping, the Oil King linear switch could be the ideal option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for bottom out force, sound, and feel when typing. Both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences, so choose the one that suits your typing style and preferences best.
Mentioned in this article
