United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

TTC Neptune vs. Gateron Weightlessness

An in-depth look at the TTC Neptune and the Gateron Weightlessness switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the TTC Neptune and Gateron Weightlessness offer distinct experiences tailored to different typing preferences. The TTC Neptune is celebrated for its innovative internal design that delivers a buttery smooth, frictionless glide, reminiscent of the soft, chewy texture of mochi or tapioca pearls. This ultralight switch allows for effortless, speedy typing, enhanced by a muted yet thocky sound signature that is both pleasing and discreet. In contrast, the Gateron Weightlessness focuses on delivering a tactile response without overwhelming the user; it features a subtle to moderate tactile feel that provides satisfying feedback with each keystroke. This switch's balanced sound profile complements its tactile characteristics, making it an excellent choice for those who appreciate a bit of texture in their typing experience. Both switches cater to unique preferences: the Neptune for those seeking a smooth and speedy typing experience, and the Weightlessness for users who enjoy tactile feedback without excessive noise. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

41g

Actuation force

50g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Lengthened 21.5mm spring

Spring

22mm double-staged spring

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the TTC Neptune and the Gateron Weightlessness, one notices distinct differences in the choice of materials for their respective top housings. The Neptune utilizes POM (polyoxymethylene) for its top housing, which results in a sound profile that is pleasing and unique, characterized by a deeper, more muted quality. In contrast, the Weightlessness employs a nylon top housing, a classic material that also provides a deeper and fuller sound. Though both materials contribute to a desirable auditory experience, the nuances of POM’s sound characteristics as a harder plastic will create a slightly crisper response when compared to the softer, sound-absorbing nylon found in the Gateron Weightlessness, which tends to generate a more rounded output.

Moving to the bottom housings, the materials employed in the TTC Neptune and Gateron Weightlessness diverge in a similar vein. The Neptune incorporates polycarbonate for its bottom housing, known for producing a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile—this is due to polycarbonate's stiffness, which enhances clarity and resonance. Conversely, the Weightlessness features nylon in its bottom housing, characterized by its sound-dampening properties that contribute to a deeper and fuller auditory experience. While both switches utilize nylon in conjunction with a differing top housing material, the distinct sound profiles result from this combination, with the Neptune’s polycarbonate bottom housing adding brightness to the overall sound, whereas the Weightlessness leans towards a more muted and enveloping tone.

Ultimately, the combinations of materials in both switches yield contrasting yet complementary results. While the TTC Neptune offers a more varied auditory experience due to the interplay of POM and polycarbonate, the Gateron Weightlessness delivers a consistently deeper tone from both the nylon top and bottom housing. Still, the fundamental impact of each housing material on the switch's performance illustrates that typing characteristics like bottom-out feel and sound are influenced primarily by the bottom housing. Therefore, users seeking a fuller sound experience will find that both switches offer unique qualities that can deliver satisfying results, despite their differing compositions.

Weight

In comparing the TTC Neptune linear switch and the Gateron Weightlessness tactile switch, we observe notable differences in their actuation forces. The Neptune has an actuation force of 41 grams, making it lighter and more suitable for extended typing or gaming sessions, as users can benefit from less fatigue. In contrast, the Weightlessness switch features a heavier actuation force of 50 grams, appealing to those who prefer a more robust typing experience, akin to a stronger push feel. Additionally, the Neptune has a bottom out force of 50 grams, indicating a consistent resistance felt when fully pressing the key. The Weightlessness switch does not provide a specified bottom out force, leaving that aspect unknown. Essentially, if users are looking for a lighter option, the TTC Neptune is optimal, while those favoring a heavier feel might lean towards the Gateron Weightlessness.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the TTC Neptune linear switch and the Gateron Weightlessness tactile switch, we find notable differences that can impact user experience. The Neptune features a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the Weightlessness has a shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. This means that the Neptune switch offers a more substantial press, which may appeal to those who appreciate a hearty depth in their key presses, potentially enhancing the typing experience. On the other hand, the Weightlessness, with its comparatively shorter travel distance, may be better suited for users who prioritize quicker response times, particularly gamers who prefer a more rapid actuation. In conclusion, the TTC Neptune offers a longer travel distance, catering to a different tactile preference, whereas the Gateron Weightlessness provides a shorter distance for those seeking responsiveness.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The TTC Neptune has an MSRP of $7.99 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Neptune for $5.09.

The Gateron Weightlessness has an MSRP of $6.10 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Weightlessness for $5.50.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When comparing the sound of the TTC Neptune linear switch and the Gateron Weightlessness tactile switch, the Neptune stands out with its distinctly low-pitched, muted, and thocky sound profile. This ensures a rich auditory experience that’s satisfying without being overly loud—ideal for both home and office environments. The thocky quality, reminiscent of a deep "thud," adds to its appeal, especially for those who appreciate a more robust acoustic feedback during their typing. In contrast, the sound characteristics of the Weightlessness switch are less detailed in this context, leaving its specific auditory profile unknown. However, the mention of a balanced sound profile suggests that it may offer a more neutral auditory experience compared to the Neptune's rich and deep sound.

In terms of feel, the Neptune linear switch excels with its buttery and frictionless typing experience. The smooth glide, coupled with a mild springy resistance likened to chewy mochi, creates an effortlessly fluid sensation that many typists crave. This switch is ideal for those who value a seamless typing experience with minimized resistance. The Weightlessness switch, while its tactile qualities are not explicitly described, presumably contributes its own unique feel, likely enhancing the typing experience through its tactile feedback. Unfortunately, without more details on the Weightlessness's feel characteristics, a direct comparison is limited.

In conclusion, the TTC Neptune switch is characterized by a muted, low-pitched, and thocky sound paired with a smooth and frictionless feel, making it an excellent choice for those who enjoy a satisfying auditory and tactile typing experience. The Gateron Weightlessness switch, while its sound and feel features remain somewhat unclear, is suggested to provide a balanced auditory quality and a subtle tactile responsiveness. If you prioritize a rich sound signature and an ultra-smooth keystroke, the Neptune is likely the better option. Conversely, the Weightlessness may appeal to those who seek a more neutral typing experience.

Conclusion

To wrap up, selecting between the TTC Neptune linear switch and the Gateron Weightlessness tactile switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you seek an ultralight switch that offers a smooth and frictionless typing experience with a unique sound profile characterized by a low-pitched, thocky resonance, the Neptune would be an excellent choice. It's particularly well-suited for fast typists, gamers, or those who simply enjoy the sensation of typing with minimal resistance. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch that provides a subtle tactile feedback without being overwhelming, the Gateron Weightlessness may be more appealing. Its balanced and moderate tactile feel could enhance your typing experience, making it a great fit for a comfortable everyday casual use. Consider your typing style, the environments you’ll be in, and whether sound and tactile feedback are important to you as you make your decision, ensuring the switch you choose aligns with your unique preferences and typing habits.

Mentioned in this article