Outemu Dustproof Black vs. HMX Swift
An in-depth look at the Outemu Dustproof Black and the HMX Swift switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Outemu Dustproof Black and the HMX Swift mechanical keyboard switches, we find two linear switches with unique characteristics. The Dustproof Black is known for its reliability and durability, as the name suggests, with its dustproof design. On the other hand, the Swift stands out with its deeper sound profile and silky smoothness, thanks to its full nylon housings and delicate 42g actuation force. While the Dustproof Black offers a no-frills linear switch, the Swift provides a more tactile and responsive typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
60g
Actuation force
42g
Bottom-out force
80g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.90 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm extended spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Outemu Dustproof Black and the HMX Swift, it is clear that both switches utilize nylon for their bottom housing. This means that typing on either switch will elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the softer nature of nylon, which absorbs more sound and creates a duller and rounder sound. However, the top housing materials differ between the two switches, with the Dustproof Black featuring a polycarbonate top housing and the Swift using a nylon top housing. The polycarbonate top housing of the Dustproof Black creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, while the nylon top housing of the Swift produces a deeper and fuller sound.
The use of different top housing materials in the Dustproof Black and the Swift results in a noticeable contrast in sound profiles. The polycarbonate top housing of the Dustproof Black offers a more clear and resonant sound profile, ideal for those looking for a sharper and crisper typing experience. In contrast, the nylon top housing of the Swift provides a deeper and fuller sound, catering to individuals who prefer a more mellow and rounder typing sound. Despite these differences, both switches offer a high-quality typing experience with their unique housing materials, catering to different preferences in sound profiles.
It is important to note that the top and bottom housing materials play a significant role in the overall sound profile and typing experience of a switch. The qualities of each housing material are split between the bottom and top of the switch, impacting both the bottom-out sound and feel, as well as the sound when releasing a key. While the nylon bottom housing of both switches contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile, the choice between the polycarbonate top housing of the Dustproof Black and the nylon top housing of the Swift will ultimately determine the overall sound characteristics of each switch.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Dustproof Black linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, it is evident that the Dustproof Black is heavier in both categories. The Dustproof Black requires an actuation force of 60 grams and a bottom out force of 80 grams, making it a more robust option compared to the Swift, which has an actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. The Dustproof Black provides a more substantial typing experience with its higher force requirements, while the Swift offers a lighter touch that may be preferred by those who enjoy typing for extended periods. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on personal preference, with some users favoring the lighter actuation and bottom out force of the Swift for longer typing sessions, while others may opt for the heavier feel of the Dustproof Black for a more tactile typing experience.
Travel distance
The Outemu Dustproof Black linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Swift linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.9 mm. Both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Dustproof Black being slightly longer. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may prefer the Swift with its shorter travel distance, while those who enjoy a more robust typing experience may lean towards the Dustproof Black. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Swift has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Swift for $2.99.
The Outemu Dustproof Black comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Outemu Dustproof Black switch is known for a neutral and quiet sound. On the other hand, the HMX Swift switch is described as clacky, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. The Swift's deeper sound profile due to its full nylon housings contributes to a unique auditory experience, while the Dustproof Black offers a more subtle typing sound. Ultimately, the sound of a switch is also influenced by external factors such as the keyboard's construction and keycaps.
When it comes to feel, the Outemu Dustproof Black switch's tactile qualities are unspecified. In contrast, the HMX Swift switch is known for being easy-to-press, with a gentle resistance during key presses that requires minimal force to activate. The feathery and bouncy sensation of the Swift switch, along with its creamy smoothness, provides a comfortable and responsive typing experience that reduces finger fatigue. While the specific feel of the Outemu Dustproof Black switch remains undefined, the Swift switch offers a light and lively touch that enhances the overall typing experience for users who prefer a more tactile feedback.
Taking into consideration the subjective qualities of sound and feel, the Outemu Dustproof Black switch and the HMX Swift switch offer distinct typing experiences. The Dustproof Black provides a more neutral and quiet sound compared to the sharper and snappier clackiness of the Swift. In terms of feel, the Dustproof Black's tactile qualities are unspecified, while the Swift switch offers an easy-to-press, feathery, bouncy, and creamy typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on personal preference for sound and feel, with the Dustproof Black likely to provide a quieter typing experience and the Swift offering a more tactile and responsive feel.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the Outemu Dustproof Black linear switch or the HMX Swift linear switch, you should take into account your typing preferences and needs. If you prefer a heavier bottom out force and are not particular about sound or feel, the Dustproof Black may be the better option for you. However, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force, enjoy a deeper sound profile, and like a smoother and easy-to-press typing experience, the HMX Swift might be more suitable for your needs. Ultimately, it's important to consider how each switch's characteristics align with your typing style and preferences before making a decision.
Mentioned in this article
