Outemu Dustproof Blue vs. Gateron Quinn
An in-depth look at the Outemu Dustproof Blue and the Gateron Quinn switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch to the Gateron Quinn tactile switch, it becomes evident that there are distinct differences between the two. The Dustproof Blue switch is best known for its reliable performance and durability, while the Quinn switch stands out for its unique combination of crisp tactility and deep, resonant sound profile. The Dustproof Blue switch offers a satisfying click response, ideal for those who enjoy auditory feedback while typing. On the other hand, the Quinn switch provides a tactile bump that is both precise and enjoyable, accompanied by a deep and immersive sound. Both switches have their own set of qualities that appeal to different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
59g
Bottom-out force
65g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
2.20 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm double-stage gold-plated
Housing materials
The Outemu Dustproof Blue and the Gateron Quinn both utilize different materials for their housing, with the Dustproof Blue featuring a polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing, while the Quinn has nylon housing for both its top and bottom. The polycarbonate top housing of the Dustproof Blue creates a sharper and crisper sound profile, ideal for showcasing RGB lighting due to its translucency. In contrast, the nylon top housing of the Quinn produces a deeper and fuller sound profile, making typing on it sound more satisfying. Both switches offer unique sound profiles based on the material used in their housing, catering to different preferences in typing experience.
One key difference between the two switches lies in their bottom housing materials. While both the Dustproof Blue and the Quinn use nylon for their bottom housing, the impact of this material on the overall sound profile is notably similar. Nylon, as a softer plastic, absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound for both switches. This consistency in bottom housing materials means that the typing experience in terms of sound is likely to be similar between the two switches. However, the contrast between the sharper sound of the Dustproof Blue's polycarbonate top housing and the deeper sound of the Quinn's nylon top housing still sets them apart in terms of overall sound profile.
In terms of tactile feedback and sound profile, the housing materials of these switches play a crucial role in the overall typing experience. The split between the polycarbonate and nylon materials in the Dustproof Blue's housing creates a unique combination of sharp and dull sounds, depending on whether you are pressing a key or releasing it. On the other hand, the uniform use of nylon in the Quinn's housing means a more consistent typing experience in terms of sound and feel. Ultimately, choosing between the Outemu Dustproof Blue and the Gateron Quinn will come down to personal preference in sound profile and tactile feedback, with the unique qualities of each housing material catering to different typing preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch and the Gateron Quinn tactile switch, we can see that both are medium to heavy switches. The Dustproof Blue has a lighter actuation force of 50 grams compared to the Quinn's 59 grams, making the Dustproof Blue slightly easier to trigger keystrokes. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Dustproof Blue requires 65 grams compared to the Quinn's 67 grams, making the Quinn slightly heavier for a more substantial typing experience. Despite these differences, both switches fall within the medium to heavy range, so users can expect similar results in terms of typing feel and performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches may come down to personal preference for a lighter or heavier typing experience.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch to the Gateron Quinn tactile switch, the Dustproof Blue has a longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the Quinn's 3.4 mm. The Dustproof Blue offers a more traditional and deeper key press feel, while the Quinn provides a slightly shorter and shallower key press. Gamers may prefer the Dustproof Blue for its deeper travel distance, allowing for more deliberate and precise key presses. On the other hand, those looking for a quicker response time may opt for the Quinn with its slightly shorter travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for key press depth and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron Quinn has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Quinn for $5.50.
The Outemu Dustproof Blue comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Outemu Dustproof Blue switch is known for its unique qualities in terms of feel and sound. Unfortunately, there is no specific information available about the sound and feel of this switch. On the other hand, the Gateron Quinn tactile switch offers a deep, resonant sound profile with a crisp and light switch-like tactility. The Quinn switch is described as having a bassy, clacky, low-pitched, and resonant sound, providing users with a rich and immersive auditory experience. Additionally, the Quinn switch is known for its snappy, polished, bouncy, accented, buttery, and creamy feel, delivering a smooth and refined typing experience with a prominent amount of tactility.
In conclusion, while the Outemu Dustproof Blue switch lacks specific information about its sound and feel characteristics, the Gateron Quinn tactile switch offers a unique combination of crisp tactility and a deep, resonant sound profile. If you are looking for a switch with a rich and immersive sound and a smooth and refined typing experience, the Gateron Quinn tactile switch would be an excellent choice. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences for sound and feel in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when considering whether to choose the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch or the Gateron Quinn tactile switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences. If you enjoy a clicky switch with a medium-heavy bottom out force and are less concerned about sound profile, the Dustproof Blue may be the right choice for you. However, if you are looking for a switch with a unique combination of crisp tactility and a deep, resonant sound profile, along with a slightly higher bottom out force, the Gateron Quinn switch would be the better option. Consider factors such as sound, feel, and typing experience to determine which switch aligns best with your preferences and needs for an optimal typing experience. Ultimately, the decision is yours to make based on what features matter most to you in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
