Outemu Dustproof Blue vs. Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear
An in-depth look at the Outemu Dustproof Blue and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Outemu Dustproof Blue and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear stand out as popular choices for keyboard enthusiasts. The Outemu Dustproof Blue is a clicky switch, offering a tactile feedback and audible click sound with each keystroke. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear is a linear switch, providing a smooth and high-pitched typing experience without the tactile bump or audible click. While the Dustproof Blue is known for its satisfying clicky feedback, the WS Aurora Clear is favored for its smooth keystrokes and maximum RGB lighting customization. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
53g
Bottom-out force
65g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Pre-travel
2.20 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
UHWMPE
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Double-staged stainless steel
Housing materials
The Outemu Dustproof Blue and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear both feature a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. This material is ideal for switches intended to be used with RGB lighting, as its translucency allows for a visually appealing effect. However, the WS Aurora Clear stands out with its UHWMPE bottom housing, offering a very bright sound signature and resonant clacks when typing. On the other hand, the Dustproof Blue utilizes a nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile by absorbing more sound than harder plastics.
In terms of housing materials, the Dustproof Blue and the WS Aurora Clear offer different sound profiles based on their top and bottom housing choices. While both switches feature a polycarbonate top housing for a sharper sound profile, the Dustproof Blue's nylon bottom housing contributes to a duller and rounder sound, compared to the WS Aurora Clear's UHWMPE bottom housing, which provides a bright sound signature. Ultimately, the choice between these switches may come down to personal preference in sound profile, with the Dustproof Blue offering a deeper tone while the WS Aurora Clear provides a brighter and more resonant sound.
Overall, the choice between the Outemu Dustproof Blue and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear will depend on the sound profile desired by the user. Both switches feature a polycarbonate top housing for a sharp and crisp sound, but their bottom housing materials differ in creating a deeper and fuller sound in the Dustproof Blue versus a brighter and more resonant sound in the WS Aurora Clear. Whether you prefer a duller tone with the Dustproof Blue's nylon bottom housing or a brighter tone with the WS Aurora Clear's UHWMPE bottom housing, these switches offer unique sound profiles that cater to different preferences.
Weight
The Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch has a slightly lighter actuation force of 50 grams compared to the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch with 53 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Dustproof Blue requires a heavier force of 65 grams, while the WS Aurora Clear is slightly lighter at 63.5 grams. Both switches fall into the medium-heavy category in terms of their force requirements. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Dustproof Blue for its lighter actuation force, whereas individuals who enjoy a more substantial typing experience may prefer the WS Aurora Clear for its lighter bottom out force. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on the user's personal preference for actuation and bottom out force.
Travel distance
The Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.8 mm. Both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Dustproof Blue being the longer option. Gamers looking for a faster response time may prefer the shorter travel distance of the WS Aurora Clear, while those looking for a more substantial keypress may lean towards the Dustproof Blue. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of keypress depth and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Outemu Dustproof Blue comes in at $3.10, whereas the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear comes in at $8.00.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Outemu Dustproof Blue switch remains unknown in terms of specific descriptors. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch is praised for its high-pitched sound profile. This means that users can expect a sharp and crisp click when typing, which is ideal for those who prefer a brighter and more vibrant typing experience. Keep in mind that the overall sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors like the keyboard and keycaps being used.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, again, the exact characteristics of the Dustproof Blue switch are unspecified. However, the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear switch is described with multiple positive attributes. Users can expect a buttery smooth keystroke that provides a fluid and seamless typing sensation. Additionally, these switches are noted for their mild feel, offering a gentle typing experience that falls in a safe middle ground zone. The switches are also polished, ensuring reduced friction and smooth key travel for a refined typing experience.
In conclusion, the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Dustproof Blue's characteristics in these areas remain unknown, the WS Aurora Clear switch stands out for its high-pitched sound profile and buttery, mild, and polished feel. Depending on personal preference, users can choose between a sharper and crisper typing experience with the WS Aurora Clear switch or opt for a smoother and more refined keystroke. Ultimately, both switches offer unique advantages, and users can expect quality performance from either option.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when considering whether to choose the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch or the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences. If you enjoy a clicky typing experience with a medium-heavy bottom out force and are not particularly concerned about sound customization, the Dustproof Blue may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth, high-pitched typing experience with maximum RGB lighting customization and a slightly lower bottom out force, the WS Aurora Clear switch is the way to go. Remember to take into account factors such as sound, feel, and your individual typing style when making your decision between these two mechanical keyboard switches. Ultimately, the best switch for you will be the one that fits your typing preferences and enhances your overall typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
