Outemu Dustproof Green vs. Gateron Type L
An in-depth look at the Outemu Dustproof Green and the Gateron Type L switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Outemu Dustproof Green and the Gateron Type L offer distinct features to suit different preferences. The Dustproof Green is a clicky switch, known for its tactile bump and audible click sound upon actuation. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L is a linear switch, offering a smooth keystroke with no tactile feedback or audible click. While the Dustproof Green may appeal to those who enjoy a satisfying clicky sound and tactile feedback, the Type L is ideal for users seeking a quiet and smooth typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
65g
Actuation force
38g
Bottom-out force
80g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.20 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
pom
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The Outemu Dustproof Green features a polycarbonate top housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile compared to the Gateron Type L's nylon top housing. The polycarbonate material used in the Dustproof Green's top housing is known for its stiffness, leading to a more clear and resonant sound. In contrast, the nylon top housing of the Type L creates a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature, which absorbs more sound and produces a duller and rounder sound. While both switches offer unique sound profiles based on their top housing materials, the Dustproof Green's polycarbonate housing is best suited for users looking for a sharper and more resonant typing experience, especially when paired with RGB lighting.
On the other hand, both the Outemu Dustproof Green and the Gateron Type L utilize a nylon bottom housing, which results in a similar deeper and fuller sound profile when typing on either switch. Nylon is a classic switch housing material known for its ability to absorb sound more effectively than harder plastics, creating a rounder and duller sound profile. The qualities of the nylon bottom housing are prominent in the bottom-out sound and feel of both switches, emphasizing a consistent typing experience regardless of the brand. This demonstrates how certain housing materials can contribute to the overall sound and feel of a switch, even when other factors may differ between products.
Overall, while the Dustproof Green and the Type L may differ in their top housing materials, they both offer a similar sound profile due to their shared use of nylon bottom housing. The Dustproof Green's polycarbonate top housing creates a distinct and sharp sound, suitable for users seeking a clear and resonant typing experience with the added benefit of RGB lighting. In contrast, the Type L's nylon top housing provides a deeper and fuller sound, appealing to users who prefer a more mellow and round sound profile. Despite these differences, both switches showcase the impact that housing materials can have on the overall typing experience, highlighting the importance of material selection in designing mechanical keyboards.
Weight
The actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch differ significantly in terms of weight. The Dustproof Green has a heavier actuation force of 65 grams and a bottom out force of 80 grams, providing a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a stronger push feel. In contrast, the Type L has a lighter actuation force of 38 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it a more suitable option for individuals who prefer a lighter touch and the ability to type for longer periods without fatigue. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for a heavier or lighter typing experience.
Travel distance
The Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch both have a travel distance of 4mm, making them equal in this aspect. When comparing these two switches, users can expect a similar tactile experience in terms of the distance traveled from the top to the bottom. The consistent 4mm travel distance in both switches ensures that users will get a uniform typing experience, regardless of which switch they choose. This similarity in travel distance allows for consistent feedback and responsiveness when typing, making both options viable choices for those looking for a standard key press distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Outemu Dustproof Green comes in at $3.10, whereas the Gateron Type L comes in at $4.70.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Outemu Dustproof Green switch is known for its crisp clicky sound, providing a satisfying auditory feedback with each press. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L linear switch offers a more subdued sound profile, producing a dampened sound when pressed. This makes the Type L a great option for those looking for a quieter typing experience, especially in shared workspaces or environments where noise levels need to be minimized. Ultimately, the sound of a switch can also be influenced by the keyboard and keycaps being used.
In terms of feel, the Dustproof Green switch offers a tactile and clicky experience, providing a noticeable bump and audible click when pressed. Contrastingly, the Gateron Type L switch is described as feathery and easy-to-press, requiring minimal force for activation. This lightweight feel reduces finger fatigue and makes it comfortable for extended typing sessions, whether for gaming, school, or work. The easy-to-press nature of the Type L enhances the typing experience by offering a responsive and effortless typing feel.
In conclusion, the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Dustproof Green provides a satisfying clicky sound and tactile feedback, the Type L offers a quieter and lighter typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on personal preference in terms of sound, feel, and the intended use case. Whether you prefer the audible click of the Dustproof Green or the feathery feel of the Type L, both switches provide quality options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the Outemu Dustproof Green clicky switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch, consider the factors of bottom out force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a heavier typing experience with a bottom out force of 80 grams, the Dustproof Green may be the better option for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter touch with a bottom out force of 45 grams, the Gateron Type L would be more suitable. Additionally, if you enjoy a clicky sound and feel, the Dustproof Green is known for that feature. However, if you prefer a more neutral or subdued sound and a feathery or easy-to-press feel, the Type L may be more aligned with your preferences. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on your personal typing preferences and needs.
Mentioned in this article
