Outemu Dustproof Red vs. Outemu Maple Leaf
An in-depth look at the Outemu Dustproof Red and the Outemu Maple Leaf switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the Outemu Dustproof Red and the Outemu Maple Leaf. The Dustproof Red is a linear switch, known for its smooth keystrokes and lack of tactile feedback. On the other hand, the Maple Leaf is a tactile switch, providing a satisfying bump when pressed. While the Dustproof Red may be preferred for its consistent feel, the Maple Leaf is often chosen for its tactile feedback, making it easier to know when a key press has been registered. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.30 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
pom
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Outemu Dustproof Red and the Outemu Maple Leaf, we can see that both switches utilize nylon for their bottom housing. This choice of material results in a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing, as nylon is known for its ability to absorb sound and create a duller, rounder tone. However, the top housing of the Dustproof Red is made of polycarbonate, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This difference in top housing material leads to a clearer and more resonant sound compared to the Maple Leaf's nylon top housing.
The use of polycarbonate in the top housing of the Dustproof Red also makes it suitable for RGB lighting, thanks to its translucency. In contrast, the Maple Leaf's nylon top housing does not offer this feature. While both switches share similar qualities in their bottom housing material, the choice of polycarbonate for the Dustproof Red's top housing sets it apart in terms of sound profile and compatibility with RGB lighting. Overall, the Dustproof Red is likely to provide a more distinct and dynamic sound experience compared to the Maple Leaf due to the difference in top housing material.
In essence, the difference in housing materials between the Outemu Dustproof Red and the Outemu Maple Leaf primarily lies in their top housing composition. While both switches share nylon bottom housings that create a deep and full sound profile, the Dustproof Red's polycarbonate top housing offers a sharper and crisper sound that is not found in the Maple Leaf. This distinction in sound quality and aesthetic features, such as compatibility with RGB lighting, sets the Dustproof Red apart as a more versatile and unique option compared to the Maple Leaf. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches may come down to personal preference in sound profile and desired features like RGB lighting.
Weight
The Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch have similar actuation forces, with the Dustproof Red requiring 45 grams and the Maple Leaf needing 55 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Dustproof Red has a lighter 60-gram bottom out force compared to the Maple Leaf's heavier 65-gram bottom out force. The lighter actuation and bottom out forces of the Dustproof Red make it more suitable for those who prefer a lighter typing experience, perfect for extended typing sessions or gaming. On the other hand, the Maple Leaf's heavier forces may be more appealing to users who prefer a more substantial push feel while typing. In this way, users can select the switch that best suits their personal preferences for typing or gaming experiences.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch, it is evident that the Dustproof Red has a longer travel distance of 4 mm, while the Maple Leaf has a shorter travel distance of 3.3 mm. The Dustproof Red offers a more traditional travel distance, which may appeal to those who prefer a deeper key press sensation. On the other hand, the Maple Leaf provides a shallower travel distance, which is preferred by many gamers for its quicker response times. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference regarding the desired key press depth and responsiveness. Both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different user preferences, ensuring that regardless of choice, the user will achieve satisfying results.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
In this case, both switches are $3.10. As such, price can't serve as a tiebreaker when choosing between the Dustproof Red and Maple Leaf.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch is often considered to have a quieter typing experience compared to the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch. The Dustproof Red switch produces a smooth and consistent sound with minimal noise, making it suitable for environments where noise may be a concern. On the other hand, the Maple Leaf switch is known to offer a more audible typing experience, with a slight tactile bump providing feedback that can result in a louder sound overall. Keep in mind that the sound produced by both switches can also be influenced by the keyboard case, plate, keycap material, and typing technique.
In terms of feel, the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch is praised for its smooth and linear keystrokes, offering minimal resistance throughout the key press. This can result in a seamless typing experience that some users find effortless and comfortable. On the other hand, the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch is designed to provide a tactile bump during actuation, giving typists a more pronounced feedback when pressing each key. This tactile sensation can enhance typing accuracy and make it easier to detect keypresses without bottoming out. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches comes down to personal preference and typing style.
Overall, the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch cater to different preferences in terms of sound and feel. If you prefer a quieter typing experience with smooth key presses, the Dustproof Red switch may be the better option for you. However, if you enjoy a more tactile typing experience with audible feedback, the Maple Leaf switch might be more to your liking. Experimenting with both switches on different keyboards and setups can help you determine which one suits your typing style and preferences best.
Conclusion
Ultimately, when deciding between the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch, you should consider your preferences for typing experience. If you prioritize a smooth and consistent keystroke with a lower bottom out force, then the Dustproof Red may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a more tactile feedback and don't mind a slightly heavier bottom out force, then the Maple Leaf switch would be more suitable. Remember to also take into account factors such as sound and feel when making your decision. Ultimately, the best switch for you will depend on your personal typing preferences and needs.
Mentioned in this article
