Outemu Dustproof Red vs. SP-Star Duck
An in-depth look at the Outemu Dustproof Red and the SP-Star Duck switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing two popular mechanical keyboard switches, the Outemu Dustproof Red and the SP-Star Duck, a clear distinction can be made between the two. The Dustproof Red is a linear switch, while the Duck is a tactile switch. The Dustproof Red is best known for its smooth keystrokes and lack of feedback, making it ideal for gamers who prefer a consistent typing experience. On the other hand, the Duck switch offers a subtle tactile typing experience with a gentle tactility and clean sound profile, appealing to those who enjoy a responsive feel while typing. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
pom
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Gold plated
Housing materials
Both the Outemu Dustproof Red and SP-Star Duck switches feature polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to polycarbonate being a stiffer plastic that leads to a more clear and resonant sound. Aesthetically, polycarbonate is ideal for switches that will be used with RGB lighting due to its translucency. However, the Dustproof Red uses a nylon bottom housing, which elicits a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Duck's polycarbonate bottom housing. Nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, creating a duller and rounder sound.
The contrasting qualities of the housing materials in the Dustproof Red and SP-Star Duck switches result in different sound profiles and typing experiences. The Dustproof Red's combination of polycarbonate top and nylon bottom housing offers a mix of sharp, crisper sound on the upstroke due to the polycarbonate, and a deeper, fuller sound on the downstroke because of the nylon. In contrast, the SP-Star Duck switch maintains a consistent sharp, higher-pitched sound profile throughout due to its polycarbonate top and bottom housing. While both switches utilize polycarbonate for the top housing, the choice of bottom housing material significantly impacts the overall typing feel and sound.
Overall, the choice between the Outemu Dustproof Red and SP-Star Duck switches will come down to personal preference in terms of sound profile and typing experience. If you prefer a switch with a mix of sharp, crisp sound on the upstroke and a deeper, fuller sound on the downstroke, the Dustproof Red may be the better option with its polycarbonate top and nylon bottom housing. On the other hand, if you prefer a consistently sharp, higher-pitched sound profile, the SP-Star Duck switch with polycarbonate top and bottom housing may be more to your liking. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities based on their housing materials that can cater to different preferences for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the SP-Star Duck tactile switch, one noticeable difference is in the actuation force. The Dustproof Red requires 45 grams of force to trigger a keystroke, while the Duck's actuation force is unknown. However, both switches have a medium bottom out force, with the Dustproof Red at 60 grams and the Duck at 58 grams. In terms of weight, the Dustproof Red is the lighter option with a slightly lower bottom out force, making it ideal for those who prefer a lighter typing experience. On the other hand, the Duck provides a slightly heavier bottom out force, which may be preferred by users who enjoy a more substantial typing feel. Both switches offer a satisfying typing experience, but the choice between them ultimately comes down to personal preference regarding actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
Both the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the SP-Star Duck tactile switch have the same travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when you press down on a key with either of these switches, you will experience the same amount of travel from the top to the bottom. This similarity in travel distance ensures that you will get consistent results in terms of key press feel and response whether you choose the Dustproof Red or the Duck switch. Despite the differences in their linear and tactile characteristics, the travel distance remains the same, making them both excellent options for keyboard enthusiasts looking for a specific travel distance in their switches.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The SP-Star Duck has an MSRP of $5.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Duck for $5.40.
The Outemu Dustproof Red comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch is known for its lack of distinctive attributes, while the SP-Star Duck tactile switch is praised for providing a subtle tactile typing experience with a clean and crispy sound profile. The Dustproof Red switch is likely to have a quieter sound profile, although specific details are not provided. On the other hand, the Duck switch is described as having a neutral sound profile, making it suitable for various uses whether you are a beginner or advanced user.
When it comes to feel, the Dustproof Red switch lacks specific descriptors, while the SP-Star Duck switch is characterized as mild, buttery, and polished. The Duck switch offers a gentle typing experience with a smooth and fluid keystroke, resulting in a seamless and effortless typing sensation. The polished finish of the Duck switch contributes to reduced friction and smooth key travel, providing a sleek typing experience that most users will find approachable.
In conclusion, while the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the SP-Star Duck tactile switch have their unique qualities, both switches are likely to provide a comfortable typing experience with different sound profiles. If you prefer a more subtle tactile typing experience with a clean sound profile, the SP-Star Duck switch would be an excellent choice. However, if you are looking for a linear switch with a potentially quieter sound profile, the Outemu Dustproof Red switch may also meet your needs. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on your personal preference for sound and feel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, if you're looking for a linear switch with a medium bottom out force and a dustproof design, the Outemu Dustproof Red switch would be a great choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a tactile switch with a slightly lower bottom out force and a gentle tactile typing experience, the SP-Star Duck switch is the way to go. The Dustproof Red switch is best suited for users who prioritize a consistent and smooth keystroke without any tactile bump, while the Duck switch is ideal for those who appreciate a subtle tactile feedback and a clean, crispy sound profile. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches comes down to personal preference and typing style, so choose the one that best suits your needs and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
