Outemu Maple Leaf vs. Aflion Thunder Shadow
An in-depth look at the Outemu Maple Leaf and the Aflion Thunder Shadow switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the Outemu Maple Leaf and the Aflion Thunder Shadow mechanical keyboard switches, there are some key differences to consider. The Maple Leaf is best known for its tactile feedback, offering a satisfying typing experience for those who prefer a more pronounced bump. On the other hand, the Thunder Shadow from Aflion is gaining recognition in the switch industry for its medium weight feel and neutral sound signature, making it a well-rounded option for those seeking a balance between tactility and smoothness. While the Maple Leaf excels in providing a tactile typing experience, the Thunder Shadow offers a harmonious balance of tactile feedback and overall feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
55g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
65g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Pre-travel
2.30 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
pom
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
The Outemu Maple Leaf and the Aflion Thunder Shadow both use different materials for their top housing, with the Maple Leaf using nylon and the Thunder Shadow using polycarbonate. The Maple Leaf's nylon top housing provides a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic that absorbs more sound. In contrast, the Thunder Shadow's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper and crisper sound profile because of its stiffer plastic composition. This results in a difference in sound experience for users, with the Maple Leaf offering a duller and rounder sound compared to the Thunder Shadow's clear and resonant sound.
On the other hand, both the Maple Leaf and the Thunder Shadow utilize nylon for their bottom housing material. This choice enhances the typing experience by eliciting a deeper and fuller sound profile, thanks to nylon's ability to absorb more sound than harder plastics. As a result, users can expect a similar sound response from both switches when it comes to bottom-out sound and feel. The shared material for the bottom housing creates a common ground in typing experience between the two switches, showcasing the benefits of using nylon for this component.
Overall, the difference in top housing materials between the Outemu Maple Leaf and the Aflion Thunder Shadow leads to distinct sound profiles. While the Maple Leaf offers a deeper and fuller sound due to its nylon top housing, the Thunder Shadow provides a sharper and crisper sound with its polycarbonate top housing. However, the shared nylon bottom housing ensures a consistent typing experience in terms of sound profile for both switches. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches may depend on individual preferences for sound characteristics and aesthetic considerations related to the top housings' materials.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch and the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch, there are some notable differences. The Maple Leaf has an actuation force of 55 grams and a bottom out force of 65 grams, making it slightly heavier than the Thunder Shadow, which has an unknown actuation force and a bottom out force of 63.5 grams. Both switches fall into the medium-heavy category, but the Maple Leaf requires a bit more force to actuate. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Thunder Shadow may be the better option, as it has a lighter bottom out force. However, for those who enjoy a more substantial typing feel, the Maple Leaf would provide a more satisfying experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm, while the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. In this case, the Thunder Shadow has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Maple Leaf. The difference of 0.2 mm may not seem significant, but it can impact the overall feel and responsiveness of the switch. Gamers who prioritize speed and quick responses may prefer the Maple Leaf with its shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial key press may lean towards the Thunder Shadow. Both switches offer tactile feedback, but the slight variation in travel distance can cater to different preferences among users. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for key response and depth of key press.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Thunder Shadow has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Thunder Shadow for $3.91.
The Outemu Maple Leaf comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch does not have a specific reputation. On the other hand, the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch is known for its neutral sound profile. This means that the Thunder Shadow produces a moderate sound level that is suitable for various typing environments, whether at home or in an office setting. Keep in mind that the overall sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the type of keyboard and keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch does not have a distinct characterization. Meanwhile, the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch is renowned for providing an invigorating typing experience. With a pronounced tactile bump, moderate to firm actuation force, and reactive feel, the Thunder Shadow offers users a satisfying typing sensation that keeps them engaged in their tasks. This engaging feel can be particularly beneficial for individuals who enjoy a tactile response while typing.
In conclusion, the Aflion Thunder Shadow tactile switch stands out for its neutral sound profile and invigorating feel. With a medium weight feel of 63.5g bottom-out, these switches strike a harmonious balance between tactile feedback and typing comfort. While the Outemu Maple Leaf tactile switch may not have specific attributes highlighted, it is worth noting that both switches are designed to provide a tactile typing experience. Ultimately, choosing between the two will depend on personal preferences for sound, feel, and overall typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you're looking for a tactile switch with a slightly higher bottom out force and a more traditional typing experience, the Outemu Maple Leaf switches may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a tactile switch with a slightly lighter bottom out force, a more innovative design, and a neutral sound profile, the Aflion Thunder Shadow switches might be more to your liking. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of typing feel, sound, and overall design. Whether you choose the Maple Leaf or the Thunder Shadow, both switches offer a tactile typing experience that can enhance your overall typing satisfaction.
Mentioned in this article
