Outemu Milk Peach vs. Durock White Lotus
An in-depth look at the Outemu Milk Peach and the Durock White Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, the Outemu Milk Peach, a linear switch, and the Durock White Lotus, a tactile switch, offer distinct options for different preferences. The Milk Peach is known for its smooth keystrokes and consistent feel. On the other hand, the White Lotus switches are renowned for their light tactility, perfect for those looking for a subtle yet enjoyable typing experience. While the Milk Peach is categorized as a smooth switch, the White Lotus boasts qualities like being easy to press, low-pitched, mild, neutral, and subtle. Both switches have their own unique benefits, making them ideal for various use cases. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
46g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
56g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Modified PC & UPE Blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Gold-plated long spring
Housing materials
The Outemu Milk Peach and Durock White Lotus both feature unique housing materials that contribute to the sound profile of the switch. The Milk Peach's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharp, high-pitched sound, while the White Lotus's modified PC & UPE Blend top housing offers a premium feel. Both switches utilize different materials for their top housing, resulting in distinct sound profiles that cater to different preferences. However, if you are looking for a clear housing for RGB lighting purposes, the polycarbonate housing of the Milk Peach may be more suitable compared to the White Lotus's modified blend.
In terms of the bottom housing, both the Milk Peach and White Lotus utilize nylon material. Nylon is known for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature which absorbs more sound. This means that both switches will provide a similar typing experience in terms of sound when it comes to the bottom-out feel. The nylon bottom housing of both switches allows for a more muffled and round sound compared to harder plastic housings, resulting in a quieter and more subdued typing experience overall.
When considering the overall typing experience of the Outemu Milk Peach and Durock White Lotus, the combination of different housing materials plays a significant role. The split between the top and bottom housings means that the qualities of each material are distinctly felt during typing. The bottom housing affects the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing impacts the sound when releasing a key. Ultimately, while both switches offer unique sound profiles due to their housing materials, the choice between the Milk Peach and White Lotus will depend on individual preferences for sound and typing feel.
Weight
Comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Milk Peach linear switch and the Durock White Lotus tactile switch, we can see that the actuation force of the Milk Peach is lighter at 45 grams, while the White Lotus requires slightly more force at 46 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Milk Peach's force is unknown compared to the White Lotus's 56 grams, which is considered medium-light. The Milk Peach provides a lighter actuation force that may be preferred by users looking for a more effortless typing experience, while the White Lotus offers a slightly heavier actuation force with a more substantial bottom out force, suitable for those seeking a firmer typing feel. In either case, users can expect similar results in terms of key actuation, albeit with slight variations in force requirements.
Travel distance
The Outemu Milk Peach linear switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm, making it slightly shorter than the Durock White Lotus tactile switch which has a travel distance of 4 mm. While the Milk Peach offers a quicker response time due to its shorter travel distance, some users may find it to be too abrupt. On the other hand, the White Lotus provides a more substantial key press with its longer travel distance, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a deeper feeling when typing. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Durock White Lotus has an MSRP of $5.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the White Lotus for $4.57.
The Outemu Milk Peach comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Outemu Milk Peach switch is known for a particular quality that is not described in the provided information, making it a bit of a mystery in terms of auditory feedback. On the other hand, the Durock White Lotus switch offers a low-pitched and neutral sound profile. The low-pitched nature of the White Lotus switch provides a deeper and mellow tone, while the neutral characteristic ensures a moderate sound level suitable for various environments. Remember, the sound produced by a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used.
Moving on to feel, the Outemu Milk Peach switch does not have a specified description in terms of tactile feedback. Conversely, the Durock White Lotus switch is characterized by an easy-to-press, mild, and subtle feel. The easy-to-press feature of the White Lotus switch ensures minimal resistance during key presses, making typing effortless and comfortable, ultimately reducing finger fatigue. Additionally, the mild and subtle qualities of the switch provide a gentle typing experience with a sound signature that is not resonant, making it suitable for shared spaces.
In conclusion, while the Outemu Milk Peach and Durock White Lotus switches offer different subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel, both can provide satisfying results depending on individual preferences. Those seeking a mysterious auditory experience may lean towards the Milk Peach switch, while individuals looking for a tactile switch with gentle resistance and a balanced sound profile may find the White Lotus switch to be more appealing. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that can enhance the typing experience for users seeking a specific combination of sound and feel in their mechanical keyboards.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the Outemu Milk Peach linear switch and the Durock White Lotus tactile switch, consider your preferences and typing habits. Choose the Outemu Milk Peach if you prefer a switch with no bottom out force and are looking for a smooth linear typing experience. On the other hand, opt for the Durock White Lotus if you desire a light tactile switch with a bottom out force of 56 grams, offering a delicate tactility ideal for work and extended typing sessions. The White Lotus switches also feature a removable light column for vibrant RGB lighting effects, adding a captivating glow to your keyboard setup. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches comes down to your personal typing style and the experience you are looking to achieve.
Mentioned in this article
