United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Outemu Tom vs. Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring

An in-depth look at the Outemu Tom and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Outemu Tom and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring mechanical keyboard switches, it is evident that both switches offer a tactile typing experience. The Tom switch, while not best known for any specific feature, falls under a category of switches that provide a satisfying tactile feedback. On the other hand, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch is highly recommended for those seeking a tactile switch with a medium level of tactility. With a lower actuation and bottom-out force, users can expect a comfortable typing experience with a deep and thocky sound profile. The Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch is also categorized as 'Bouncy', adding to the unique typing experience it offers. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

55g

Actuation force

48g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

2.20 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.30 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

20mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the Outemu Tom and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring, it can be seen that both switches utilize polycarbonate in their top housing. This material choice results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile for both switches. However, the Tom also features a nylon bottom housing, which elicits a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Shadow's polycarbonate bottom housing. This difference in bottom housing material may lead to a more rounded sound when typing on the Tom switch, while the Shadow switch could produce a clearer and more resonant sound.

The use of different housing materials in the Outemu Tom and Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches creates a distinct typing experience for each. The Tom's combination of polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing balances sharpness and depth, resulting in a unique sound profile that leans towards a fuller sound. On the other hand, the Shadow's polycarbonate top and bottom housing prioritize sharpness and clarity, offering a crisper sound profile overall. This difference in sound characteristics showcases how the choice of housing materials can significantly impact the overall typing feel and sound of a switch.

While both the Outemu Tom and Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches share polycarbonate in their top housing, the divergence in their bottom housing materials leads to a noticeable contrast in sound profiles. The Tom switch's nylon bottom housing contributes to a deeper and duller sound, while the Shadow switch's polycarbonate bottom housing enhances clarity and resonance. This distinction highlights the importance of considering both top and bottom housing materials when selecting a switch, as they play a significant role in shaping the overall typing experience.

Weight

The Outemu Tom tactile switch has a slightly heavier actuation force of 55 grams compared to the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch which has an actuation force of 48 grams. However, the bottom out force of the Shadow (Ink) is higher at 55 grams, while the Tom's bottom out force is unknown. In terms of weight, some may prefer the lighter actuation force of the Shadow (Ink) for longer typing or gaming sessions, while others may prefer the heavier actuation force of the Tom for a more substantial typing experience. Both switches offer a different tactile feel due to their varying actuation and bottom out forces, so users can choose based on their personal preference for typing or gaming needs.

Travel distance

In comparing the travel distance of the Outemu Tom tactile switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch, we can see that the Tom has a shorter travel distance of 3.3 mm while the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring has a longer travel distance of 4 mm. The Tom's 3.3 mm travel distance is shorter compared to the traditional 4.0 mm, making it favored by gamers for its faster response times. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring's 4 mm travel distance provides a deeper feeling when typing, which some users may prefer over the shorter, more abrupt feel of the Tom. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for travel distance and typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring for $3.57.

The Outemu Tom comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Tom switch is known for having a neutral sound profile, making it a good option for those who prefer a quieter typing experience. On the other hand, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch is praised for its deep and thocky sound, adding a satisfying auditory element to your typing sessions. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can be influenced by various factors such as the keyboard housing and keycaps used.

In terms of feel, the Tom switch offers a standard tactile experience with no specific standout qualities mentioned. Conversely, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch is described as bouncy, providing users with a spring-like feedback sensation that enhances the typing experience. This bouncy feel gives a lively and responsive touch to each key press, offering a unique tactile experience for those who enjoy a bit of rebound when typing.

Overall, both the Outemu Tom and Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches have their own strengths and qualities. If you are looking for a quieter typing experience with a standard tactile feel, the Tom switch may be the better option for you. However, if you prefer a switch with a deep and thocky sound profile and a bouncy tactile feedback, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch would be a fantastic choice. Keep in mind that personal preference plays a significant role in choosing the right switch for your mechanical keyboard setup, so trying out both options may be the best way to determine which one suits your typing style and preferences the most.

Conclusion

To sum up, when it comes to choosing between the Outemu Tom tactile switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch, it really depends on your personal preferences and typing style. If you prefer a switch with a lighter bottom out force and a more approachable tactility, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring may be the better option for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a switch with a unique feel and sound profile, the Tom switch could be the way to go. Ultimately, the decision comes down to what you prioritize in your typing experience – whether it's the feel, sound, or any other specific attribute that matters most to you. It's always a good idea to try out different switches to see which one suits your needs best.

Mentioned in this article