KTT Phalaenopsis vs. HMX Twilight
An in-depth look at the KTT Phalaenopsis and the HMX Twilight switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboards, the choice of switch can drastically influence your typing experience, particularly when contrasting the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch with the HMX Twilight linear switch. The Phalaenopsis is designed for those who appreciate a tactile response—offering a satisfying 50g tactile force and a light actuation force of just 37g, it minimizes finger fatigue and enhances comfort during long typing sessions. Its categorization as 'Bassy', 'Stepped', and 'Thocky' highlights its rich sound profile, which is particularly pleasing for typing enthusiasts who enjoy an audible feedback. On the other hand, the HMX Twilight specializes in a smoother, quieter experience, featuring an extended 3.85mm travel distance that delivers the signature clacky sound associated with HMX switches, while still being less noisy than other traditional switches. This makes it an ideal choice for users who prefer a seamless keystroke without the tactile bump or those working in quieter environments. Both switches cater to different preferences, appealing to tactile enthusiasts and linear fans alike. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
42g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.85 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
When comparing the KTT Phalaenopsis and HMX Twilight switches, the differing housing materials—polycarbonate for the Phalaenopsis and nylon for the Twilight—introduce notable contrasts in sound profiles. The Phalaenopsis switch, with its polycarbonate top and bottom housings, tends to produce a sharper, higher-pitched sound, resulting in a crisper auditory experience during typing. This effect is attributed to polycarbonate’s stiffer nature, which enhances clarity and resonance. Furthermore, the translucency of polycarbonate allows for vibrant RGB lighting to shine through, adding an aesthetic dimension to the switch’s performance. In contrast, the HMX Twilight employs nylon for both its top and bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon's softness contributes to a more muted auditory experience, as it absorbs more sound and produces a duller, rounder sound that fosters a different typing feel.
While the KTT Phalaenopsis benefits from polycarbonate's clarity to create a distinct sound when the keys are released, the HMX Twilight's nylon materials furnish a more subdued impact during this phase. The characteristics of the polycarbonate housing tend to shine when you let go of the key, emphasizing the sharper resonance, while the nylon housing dulls that impact, promoting a balanced and deeper sound. This disparity can lead to different user experiences, where the Phalaenopsis offers a more articulated sound profile suitable for gamers or typists who enjoy an audible distinction with each keystroke, and the Twilight caters to users favoring a quieter, more comfortable typing experience.
Despite these differences, the combination of polycarbonate in the Phalaenopsis and nylon in the Twilight illustrates how diverse materials can yield unique yet complementary results in a keyboard switch. If a user is seeking a mix of both experiences, employing switches that combine both types of housings can provide a well-rounded performance. For instance, using nylon for softening the bottom-out sound while incorporating polycarbonate for the top can strike a balance between sharpness and richness, giving a more nuanced auditory feedback and tactile experience. Thus, while the two switches stand apart in their material choices, similar results can still be achieved through strategic combinations, appealing to a broad spectrum of typists.
Weight
When comparing the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch and the HMX Twilight linear switch, a notable distinction can be observed in their actuation forces. The Phalaenopsis features a lighter actuation force of 37 grams, whereas the Twilight requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 42 grams, making it a better choice for typists who prefer a more substantial feel. However, both switches exhibit the same bottom out force of 50 grams, which ensures that users will experience a consistent tactile feedback when the keys are fully pressed down. For those seeking a lighter typing experience, the KTT Phalaenopsis would be the most suitable option, as its overall force requirements are lower, allowing for extended typing sessions without fatigue. Conversely, the HMX Twilight, with its higher actuation force, offers a firmer push, which may appeal to users who enjoy a more robust typing sensation.
Travel distance
The KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Twilight linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.85 mm. This difference indicates that the Phalaenopsis will provide a more pronounced key feel, appealing to those who appreciate a deeper press. In contrast, the Twilight’s travel distance aligns more closely with the preferences of gamers seeking faster response times due to its shorter actuation. While both switches offer a comfortable experience, those who favor a more tactile and substantial feel will likely prefer the Phalaenopsis, whereas those who appreciate quick actuation might lean towards the Twilight. Thus, the Phalaenopsis is the longer travel switch, while the Twilight is the shorter option.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.
The HMX Twilight has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Twilight for $3.29.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch features a unique auditory profile characterized by its bassy and thocky qualities. Users can expect a deeper, richer sound during key presses, reminiscent of a satisfying "thud" or "knock," adding an engaging auditory feedback that many typists and gamers appreciate. This sound enhances the overall typing experience, making it more enjoyable and immersive. In contrast, the HMX Twilight linear switch is noted for its quieter operation, thanks to an extended travel distance of 3.85mm, which slightly dampens the sound volume without sacrificing the driving characteristics of HMX switches. This design could appeal to users seeking a more subdued acoustic environment, yet it doesn't fully disclose the tonal qualities characteristic of the Phalaenopsis.
In terms of feel, the Phalaenopsis provides a tactile experience that can be typified as stepped. It delivers a discernible tactile bump at a force of 50g, allowing typists to feel a clear transition during key presses. This stepping sensation differentiates it from more aggressive tactile switches, as the Phalaenopsis maintains a balance that minimizes finger fatigue with its lighter actuation force of 37g. On the other hand, the HMX Twilight's characteristics regarding feel remain unknown based on the available information. This could mean that its linear nature may offer a smooth and uninterrupted keystroke experience, but without specific descriptors regarding its tactile feedback, one cannot make a direct comparison to the Phalaenopsis.
In summary, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch and HMX Twilight linear switch cater to different preferences in sound and feel. The Phalaenopsis shines with its rich auditory feedback and satisfying tactile response, while the Twilight presents a quieter, potentially smoother experience, albeit with lesser clarity regarding its tactile characteristics. Users considering these switches should look carefully at their preferences, as the Phalaenopsis offers the enchanting thocky and bassy qualities that may appeal to those valuing sound, while the HMX Twilight may suit individuals seeking a gentler auditory experience without compromising on functionality.
Conclusion
To wrap up, your choice between the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch and the HMX Twilight linear switch ultimately depends on your typing preferences and the kind of experience you seek. If you value tactile feedback and a richer sound profile that enhances the joy of typing, the Phalaenopsis is an excellent choice. Its light actuation force and satisfying tactile bump make it ideal for long typing sessions without causing finger fatigue. This switch excels for typists who enjoy a deeper, "thocky" sound that provides a unique auditory experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother, quieter keystroke with an extended travel distance, the Twilight linear switch would be more suitable. Its lighter bottom-out force and sleek linear feel are perfect for gamers or those who prioritize speed and reduced noise over tactile feedback. Ultimately, both switches have their strengths, and your decision should align with how you plan to use your keyboard, whether for typing, gaming, or a bit of both.
Mentioned in this article
