KTT Phalaenopsis vs. Wuque Studio WS Yellow
An in-depth look at the KTT Phalaenopsis and the Wuque Studio WS Yellow switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to selecting a mechanical keyboard switch, two popular options worth considering are the KTT Phalaenopsis and the Wuque Studio WS Yellow. The Phalaenopsis is a tactile switch known for its stunning translucent design and light actuation force of 37g. With its satisfying and discernible tactile bump of 50g, every keystroke becomes a delightful experience. Additionally, this switch is categorized as 'Bassy', 'Stepped', and 'Thocky', making it perfect for those who enjoy a tactile feedback sensation while typing. On the other hand, the WS Yellow is a linear switch that combines classic materials with cutting-edge engineering. It features a 22mm double-stage spring, providing a delightful bounce and a familiar sound signature that enthusiasts adore. These switches are categorized as 'Creamy', 'Mild', and 'Polished', offering a smoother and more fluid typing experience. However, let's dive deeper beyond these generalities to help you decide on the perfect switch for your specific needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Spring
22mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
The KTT Phalaenopsis and the Wuque Studio WS Yellow differ in their housing materials, with the Phalaenopsis featuring a polycarbonate top and bottom housing, while the WS Yellow utilizes a nylon top and bottom housing. The use of polycarbonate in the Phalaenopsis creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, making it ideal for those seeking a more clear and resonant typing experience. In contrast, the nylon housing of the WS Yellow elicits a deeper and fuller sound profile, thanks to its softer plastic that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound.
When it comes to aesthetics, the polycarbonate top housing of the Phalaenopsis stands out due to its translucency, making it perfect for pairing with RGB lighting. On the other hand, the WS Yellow's nylon top housing does not offer the same level of transparency or visual appeal. However, both switches provide unique sound profiles that cater to different preferences and typing styles. While the Phalaenopsis provides a sharper and crisper sound, the WS Yellow's nylon housing delivers a deeper and fuller typing experience.
Looking at the bottom housings, the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Phalaenopsis continues to contribute to its sharp and resonant sound profile. Meanwhile, the nylon bottom housing in the WS Yellow complements its rounder sound by absorbing more sound and creating a duller effect. The bottom housing of a switch primarily impacts the bottom-out sound and feel when the switch is pressed down, while the top housing influences the sound when a key is released. Therefore, the different materials used in the top and bottom housings of these switches create variations in the overall sound experience, providing users with more diverse options to suit their individual preferences.
In conclusion, the KTT Phalaenopsis and the Wuque Studio WS Yellow differ in their housing materials, resulting in distinct sound profiles. The polycarbonate top and bottom housing in the Phalaenopsis offer a sharper and clearer sound, while the nylon top and bottom housing in the WS Yellow create a deeper and fuller sound. Additionally, the translucency of the polycarbonate top housing in the Phalaenopsis makes it suitable for incorporating RGB lighting, while the nylon housing in the WS Yellow lacks the same visual appeal. These differences in housing materials allow users to choose between a crisper or rounder sound, providing a more tailored typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch and the Wuque Studio WS Yellow linear switch, there are some notable differences. The Phalaenopsis has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. In contrast, the WS Yellow's actuation force is unavailable, but it has a slightly heavier bottom out force of 53 grams, which can be considered medium-light.
For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Phalaenopsis would be a suitable choice as its actuation force is lighter than the WS Yellow. This can be advantageous for users who need to type for extended periods, such as in a work setting or during long gaming sessions. On the other hand, if a more substantial typing experience is desired, the WS Yellow provides a slightly heavier bottom out force, offering a firmer and more tactile feel while typing.
While the actuation forces of the two switches are not directly comparable due to the unavailability of the WS Yellow's actuation force, it can be assumed that the Phalaenopsis would generally require a lighter touch to trigger a keystroke. However, both switches have fairly similar bottom out forces, with the WS Yellow being slightly heavier. Therefore, if a user prefers the bottom out force to be the deciding factor, they can expect comparable results between the two switches, with the WS Yellow offering a slightly firmer typing experience.
Travel distance
The KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch has a travel distance of 4.0mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Yellow linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8mm. Both switches have relatively similar travel distances, with the Phalaenopsis being slightly longer. A travel distance of 4.0mm is considered more traditional, while 3.8mm is on the shallower side. Gamers often prefer shorter travel distances for faster response times, making the WS Yellow a popular choice for gaming. However, some people find shorter travel distances to feel too abrupt, so if you prefer a more substantial feel, the Phalaenopsis with its slightly longer travel distance may be a better option. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and how you prioritize responsiveness versus depth of key press.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.
The Wuque Studio WS Yellow comes in at $3.50 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch offers a bassy and thocky sound profile during key presses. These switches produce a deeper, richer, and more satisfying sound, resembling the depth and richness associated with bass tones. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Yellow linear switch sound qualities are unknown, as no descriptors or descriptions are provided. However, it is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used.
When it comes to feel, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch is described as a stepped switch. Stepped switches provide a more mild tactile experience compared to hypertactile switches. They offer two stages of the keystroke, allowing users to feel some pre-travel and/or post-travel. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Yellow linear switch offers a creamy, mild, and polished typing experience. Creamy switches are smooth and buttery, providing a silky sensation when typing. Mild switches offer a gentle typing experience without pronounced characteristics, making them approachable for most users. Polished switches have a smooth and refined finish, resulting in reduced friction and smooth key travel.
Overall, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch excels in providing a delightful typing experience with its light actuation force, discernible tactile bump, and satisfying sound profile. It minimizes finger fatigue during prolonged typing sessions and ensures each keystroke is a delightful experience. The Wuque Studio WS Yellow linear switch, although lacking specific information on sound and feel, offers a timeless fusion of classic materials and cutting-edge engineering. Its lightweight design ensures effortless keystrokes and a smooth typing experience. Both switches have their unique qualities that can cater to different preferences, and depending on the user's choice of board and keycaps, similar results can be achieved in terms of sound and feel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, if you are looking for a tactile switch with a light bottom out force and a satisfying tactile bump, the KTT Phalaenopsis would be an excellent choice. With its 50g bottom out force, the Phalaenopsis offers a delightful typing experience, ensuring each keystroke is enjoyable. Additionally, its beautiful translucent appearance adds to the overall appeal. On the other hand, if you prefer a linear switch with a medium-light bottom out force and a smooth and fluid typing experience, the Wuque Studio WS Yellow would be a great option. With its lightweight design and 53g bottom out force, the WS Yellow provides effortless keystrokes and a satisfying bounce. Furthermore, its material blend offers a familiar sound signature that enthusiasts have come to adore. Consider your preferences for both sound and feel when making your decision.
Mentioned in this article
