United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Pine vs. Gateron Type L

An in-depth look at the KTT Pine and the Gateron Type L switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to compare are the KTT Pine and the Gateron Type L, both of which are linear switches. The KTT Pine is known for its medium-heavy feel, buttery smooth key travel, and effortless typing experience. With a factory-lubed finish that minimizes friction, this switch is categorized as 'Bassy', 'Buttery', 'Creamy', and 'Low-pitched'. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L, part of Sillyworks' "Project Rehash," offers a lightweight typing experience, requiring only 45g to bottom out. It boasts a sound signature that leans towards the lower end of the acoustic spectrum and is categorized as 'Neutral', 'Subdued', 'Feathery', and 'Easy-to-press'. Each switch has its own unique characteristics and advantages, making them suitable for different preferences and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

38g

Bottom-out force

58g

Bottom-out force

45g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

15.5mm gold-plated spring

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

Both the KTT Pine and Gateron Type L switches feature different materials for their top and bottom housing, with the Pine using polycarbonate for both and the Type L using nylon for both. The Pine's polycarbonate housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, while the Type L's nylon housing results in a deeper and fuller sound. The stiffness of polycarbonate leads to a clear and resonant sound, while the softness of nylon absorbs more sound, creating a duller tone.

In terms of aesthetics, the Pine switch's clear polycarbonate top housing is ideal for showcasing RGB lighting, while the Type L's nylon top housing does not offer this feature. Both switches have distinctive sound profiles due to their housing materials, with the Pine offering a crisper sound and the Type L providing a more rounded tone. The impact of the housing material is felt differently depending on whether it is the top or bottom housing, with the bottom housing influencing the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing affects the sound upon key release.

Overall, while the Pine and Type L switches serve similar functions as keyboard components, their choice of housing material greatly impacts the sound and feel of typing. The polycarbonate top and bottom housing of the Pine create a consistent crisp sound profile throughout typing, while the nylon housing of the Type L produces a fuller and deeper sound experience. Both switches cater to different preferences in sound and typing feel, with the Pine offering a sharper sound and the Type L providing a more rounded tone. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and aesthetics.

Weight

In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Pine linear switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch, it is evident that the Type L is the lighter option. The Pine switch has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, while the Type L has an actuation force of 38 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. The Pine switch offers a more medium resistance, which may provide a balance between typing comfort and feedback. On the other hand, the Type L switch has a lighter actuation force, which could be preferable for those looking for a smoother and easier typing experience. Both switches offer distinct advantages based on individual preferences. Those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Gateron Type L, while users seeking a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the KTT Pine. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal typing preferences and the desired typing feel.

Travel distance

Both the KTT Pine linear switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch have a travel distance of 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. This means that regardless of which switch you choose, you can expect a similar typing experience in terms of how far the keys travel when pressed. This can be beneficial for those who prefer consistency in their typing feel. Though the travel distance is the same, other factors such as actuation force and key feel may differ between the two switches, so it's important to consider those aspects as well when choosing between the two.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Pine has an MSRP of $4.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Pine for $4.15.

The Gateron Type L comes in at $4.70 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the KTT Pine linear switch offers a bassy and low-pitched sound profile, providing a deeper and richer sound during key presses. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L linear switch is described as having a neutral and subdued sound, making it suitable for various environments and preferences. Both switches offer distinct sound profiles that can enhance the typing experience based on individual preferences. Keep in mind that the sound produced by a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.

Moving on to the feel of the switches, the KTT Pine linear switch is praised for its buttery and creamy typing experience, offering a smooth and fluid keystroke sensation. This provides a seamless and effortless typing experience that can be quite satisfying. In comparison, the Gateron Type L linear switch is described as feeling feathery and easy-to-press, requiring minimal exertion and reducing finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. Both switches provide unique tactile experiences that cater to different preferences in typing feel.

Overall, the KTT Pine linear switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Pine switch leans towards a deeper and richer sound with a smooth keystroke experience, the Type-L switch provides a more subdued sound profile alongside a feather-light and easy-to-press feel. Depending on individual preferences for sound and typing sensation, both switches can offer a satisfying typing experience, ensuring that newcomers to the mechanical keyboard world can find a switch that suits their needs.

Conclusion

In closing, when choosing between the KTT Pine linear switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch, consider your preferences and typing habits. If you prefer a medium bottom out force and a smooth, buttery typing experience with a bassy and low-pitched sound profile, the KTT Pine switch may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force and a feathery, easy-to-press typing feel with a neutral and subdued sound profile, the Gateron Type L switch could be the better option. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches comes down to personal preference and the typing experience you desire.

Mentioned in this article