SP-Star Polaris Gray vs. Aflion Windy Shadow
An in-depth look at the SP-Star Polaris Gray and the Aflion Windy Shadow switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the SP-Star Polaris Gray and the Aflion Windy Shadow mechanical keyboard switches, both linear switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Polaris Gray is favored for its bouncy typing experience and clean, clacky sound profile, appealing to those who enjoy a bit of bounce while typing. On the other hand, the Windy Shadow from Aflion presents a neutral sound profile with a distinctive bounce from its extended spring, providing a comfortable medium-light 55g bottom-out feel. These switches are ideal for users who prefer a quieter typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold plated
Spring
19.7mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
Both the SP-Star Polaris Gray and the Aflion Windy Shadow feature polycarbonate top housings, which are known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which leads to a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that plan to use RGB lighting. However, the Aflion Windy Shadow stands out with its nylon bottom housing, which elicits a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Polaris Gray.
In terms of sound profile, the Polaris Gray and Windy Shadow both benefit from the sharp and clear qualities brought by their polycarbonate top housings. However, the nylon bottom housing in the Windy Shadow offers a different typing experience, with a deeper and fuller sound compared to the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Polaris Gray. This contrast in housing materials results in a unique typing feel for each switch, catering to different preferences and typing styles.
The split between polycarbonate and nylon in the housing materials of the Polaris Gray and Windy Shadow allows for a nuanced typing experience. While the top housing influences the sound when a key is released, the bottom housing has a greater impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when a key is pressed. This division of qualities between the top and bottom housings gives each switch a distinct typing feel, making them suitable for different users based on their sound and tactile preferences.
Weight
In comparing the SP-Star Polaris Gray linear switch and the Aflion Windy Shadow linear switch, it is evident that the Polaris Gray has a heavier bottom out force of 67 grams compared to the Windy Shadow's 55 grams, making the Polaris Gray the heavier option. In terms of actuation force, both switches have an unknown force required to trigger a keystroke. This similarity means that users can expect a similar typing experience in terms of the initial push needed to register a keypress. Some users may prefer the lighter actuation force for extended typing sessions, while others may appreciate the heavier bottom out force for a more substantial and tactile typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for typing feel and keypress feedback.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the SP-Star Polaris Gray linear switch is 4.0mm, while the Aflion Windy Shadow linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5mm. In this case, the Windy Shadow has a shorter travel distance compared to the Polaris Gray. The Polaris Gray falls on the more traditional side of travel distances, while the Windy Shadow is slightly shallower. Gamers may prefer the Windy Shadow for its faster response time due to the shorter travel distance, while those looking for a more substantial key press may opt for the Polaris Gray. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on personal preference for travel distance and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The SP-Star Polaris Gray has an MSRP of $5.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Polaris Gray for $5.00.
The Aflion Windy Shadow has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Windy Shadow for $3.91.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the SP-Star Polaris Gray and the Aflion Windy Shadow switches are described as low-pitched and neutral, offering a mellow tone that is suitable for various preferences. The Polaris Gray is additionally noted for its thocky sound profile, providing a deep and satisfying auditory experience when typing. On the other hand, the Windy Shadow offers a distinctive bounce due to its extended spring design, contributing to a unique typing sound at a comfortable 55g bottom-out force. Overall, both switches offer a pleasing sound profile that can enhance the overall typing experience, though personal preference will ultimately play a significant role in selecting the preferred sound.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, both the Polaris Gray and the Windy Shadow are described as providing a mild typing experience. This means that they offer a gentle keypress that is approachable to most users, as they fall within a safe middle-ground zone in terms of actuation force and tactile feedback. Additionally, the Polaris Gray is noted for its polished finish, which results in smoother key travel and reduced friction during typing. This refined texture can enhance the overall typing experience for users who prioritize a sleek and seamless operation. In comparison, the Windy Shadow focuses on providing a comfortable typing experience with its medium-light actuation force, ensuring that users can enjoy extended typing sessions without experiencing fatigue.
Considering all the available information, both the SP-Star Polaris Gray and the Aflion Windy Shadow linear switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Polaris Gray is praised for its thocky sound profile and polished feel, the Windy Shadow stands out for its distinctive bounce and comfortable actuation force. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will come down to personal preference and the specific typing experience that each user is looking to achieve. However, users can expect a similar level of quality and performance from both switches, ensuring a satisfying typing experience regardless of their selection.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the SP-Star Polaris Gray linear switch and the Aflion Windy Shadow linear switch, consider the typing experience you are looking for. If you prefer a bouncy and clacky feel with a medium-heavy bottom out force, the Polaris Gray may be the best option for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a neutral sound profile with a distinctive bounce and a medium-light bottom out force, the Aflion Windy Shadow could be more suitable. Ultimately, your choice should be based on your personal preferences for typing feel and sound profile.
Mentioned in this article
