HMX Poro vs. Gateron Quinn
An in-depth look at the HMX Poro and the Gateron Quinn switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX Poro and Gateron Quinn present two distinct yet appealing options, catering to different typing preferences. The HMX Poro is a linear switch celebrated for its silky smooth keystrokes and ultra-light actuation force, making typing feel effortless and fluid. Users seeking a streamlined and quiet experience will appreciate the Poro's poppy and clacky sound profile, which enhances the tactile sensation without being overly disruptive. In contrast, the Gateron Quinn stands out as a tactile switch that balances crispness with character, offering a distinct tactile bump and a rich, resonant sound. This switch is ideal for those who enjoy a deeper auditory feedback during their typing sessions, as well as a clean, polished feel with each keystroke. Ultimately, the choice between the HMX Poro's smooth linearity and the Gateron Quinn's engaging tactility boils down to personal preference. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
59g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm double-stage gold-plated
Housing materials
The housing materials of the HMX Poro and Gateron Quinn are strikingly similar as both switches utilize nylon for both their top and bottom housings. Nylon is recognized as a classic switch housing material, and in this context, both switches manifest identical acoustic properties. Specifically, the use of nylon contributes to a deeper, fuller sound profile during typing, due to its softer nature which allows it to absorb more sound compared to harder plastics. This leads to a more muted and rounded auditory experience that users often seek for a tactile and enjoyable keyboard interaction.
The implications of using nylon in both the top and bottom housings extend to the overall typing experience for both the Poro and Quinn switches. Since both the top and bottom are made of nylon, the qualities imparted by each housing work together to enhance the sound and feel of the switches. When a key is pressed down, the bottom housing impacts the bottom-out sound significantly, while the top housing influences the sound upon release. Users will find that the resulting acoustic characteristics are similarly pleasing across both switch models.
In essence, because both the HMX Poro and Gateron Quinn switches share the same nylon material for their housings, they are likely to produce comparable results regarding sound and tactile feedback. This uniformity means that users can expect similar performance in terms of typing experience, allowing them to switch between the two models without a significant difference in auditory or feel-quality. Consequently, the choice between the two may ultimately boil down to personal preference in terms of other features, rather than the switch material used in construction.
Weight
The HMX Poro linear switch and the Gateron Quinn tactile switch exhibit notable differences in both actuation and bottom out forces, which cater to different user preferences in typing experience. The Poro has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, making it a lighter option that allows for less fatigue during extended typing sessions or gaming marathons. In contrast, the Quinn features a higher actuation force of 59 grams and a bottom out force of 67 grams, categorizing it as a medium-heavy switch that provides a more substantial pushback, appealing to those who prefer a stronger typing feel. Consequently, for users seeking a lighter switch for comfort over prolonged use, the HMX Poro is the better choice, while those desiring a firmer feedback and a more tactile experience should consider the Gateron Quinn. Overall, the differing forces clearly delineate each switch's suitability for varied typing styles.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX Poro linear switch and the Gateron Quinn tactile switch, the Poro features a travel distance of 3.7 mm, while the Quinn has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. This makes the Poro the better choice for those who prefer a more substantial feel with a deeper actuation, providing a more traditional typing experience. In contrast, the Quinn's shorter travel distance might appeal to gamers and users looking for faster response times, as it allows for quicker key presses. While both switches are designed to cater to different preferences, the Poro offers a hearty depth, making it suitable for users who enjoy more feedback, while the Quinn's design leans towards a preference for efficiency and speed. Overall, the difference in travel distance between these two switches highlights the diverse needs of keyboard users in terms of feel and performance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Poro has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Poro for $2.99.
The Gateron Quinn has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Quinn for $5.50.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX Poro linear switch showcases a satisfyingly poppy and clacky sound profile, which is characterized by a bright and crisp auditory response during key presses. This makes it an ideal choice for those who enjoy a lively typing experience with an engaging aural quality. Conversely, the Gateron Quinn tactile switch presents a richer and deeper sound signature, blending crisp and clacky characteristics with a bassy and resonant tone. This blend creates a profound auditory experience, with a lower frequency resonance that is immersive and adds depth to each keystroke. Both switches offer distinct sound profiles, with the Poro leaning toward a sharper sound and the Quinn favoring warmth and richness, yet individual experiences may vary based on the keyboard and keycap choices.
When it comes to feel, the HMX Poro switch is designed for an effortlessly smooth keystroke experience, meticulously lubricated to ensure reduced friction and seamless travel. This lends to a typing sensation that is buttery and creamy, offering a satisfying glide with each press. On the other hand, the Gateron Quinn tactile switch features a unique combination of snappiness and polished refinement. Its tactile bump is pronounced but not overwhelming, providing a medium level of tactility. Additionally, these switches have a bouncy feedback that enhances the typing experience with a lively, elastic sensation. While both switches provide smooth and refined keystrokes, the Poro emphasizes slick motion, whereas the Quinn focuses on responsive tactile feedback.
In conclusion, the HMX Poro linear switch and Gateron Quinn tactile switch present two distinct typing experiences, each appealing to different preferences. The Poro excels in providing an ultra-smooth and lively auditory and tactile response, making it suitable for those who favor a fluid typing experience with a pronounced sound. The Quinn, with its deeper, resonant sound and snappier tactile feedback, offers a rich auditory adventure combined with a responsive feel that caters to tactile switch enthusiasts. Regardless of your choice, both switches promise to enhance your mechanical keyboard experience significantly.
Conclusion
To sum up, the choice between the HMX Poro linear switch and the Gateron Quinn tactile switch ultimately hinges on your personal preferences and typing style. If you find yourself favoring a lightweight feel and enjoy a smooth, uninterrupted keystroke experience, the HMX Poro linear switch is likely the better option for you. Its 50-gram bottom-out force and silky smooth action make it ideal for fast typists, gamers seeking rapid key presses, or anyone who prefers a more fluid typing experience. In contrast, if you're drawn to a more tactile experience with distinct feedback and a satisfying auditory presence, the Gateron Quinn tactile switch would be your go-to choice. With a firmer 67-gram bottom-out force and a rich, resonant sound profile, the Quinn is perfect for those who appreciate tactile bumps and prefer a bit more substance in their keystrokes. Ultimately, your preference for sound, feel, and typing dynamics will guide your choice between these two excellent switches.
Mentioned in this article
