HMX Poro vs. Everglide Sticky Rice (V2)
An in-depth look at the HMX Poro and the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, enthusiasts often find themselves weighing the benefits of various options, including the HMX Poro and Everglide's Sticky Rice (V2). The HMX Poro shines as a linear switch, celebrated for its silky smooth keystrokes that offer an effortless glide thanks to meticulous lubrication, making it an attractive choice for those who prefer minimal resistance and an ultra-light actuation force. This switch delivers a satisfyingly poppy and clacky sound profile that can enhance the typing experience. On the other hand, the Sticky Rice (V2) employs Hall effect technology, providing a more balanced typing experience with a neutral sound signature that leans towards the coveted "thock" sound cherished by keyboard enthusiasts. Its dustproof stem minimizes wobble and maximizes performance, appealing to users who seek a refined tactile sensation without sacrificing the smoothness of keystrokes. Both switches cater to different preferences, whether you're drawn to the ultra-light feel of a linear switch or the tactile balance of a hall effect switch. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
N/A
Total travel
3.70 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the HMX Poro and the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2), the contrasting materials used in their top housings highlight distinct sound profiles that characterize each switch. The Poro features a nylon top housing, which, as a softer plastic, contributes to a deeper and fuller sound. This characteristic is intrinsic to nylon's ability to absorb sound, resulting in a rounded auditory experience that is often preferred in typing scenarios where a more subdued sound is desired. In contrast, the Sticky Rice (V2) employs a polycarbonate top housing, which produces a sharper, crisper sound profile due to its stiffer nature. This stiffness enhances the clarity and resonance of the sound, making it particularly suitable for users looking for a pronounced auditory feedback when typing. Ultimately, this dichotomy between materials illustrates how the choice of top housing can significantly influence the overall acoustic quality experienced while using each switch.
The bottom housing of both switches provides a commonality that reinforces the acoustic characteristics of the HMX Poro and the Sticky Rice (V2). Both switches utilize nylon for their bottom housings, which is known for its ability to produce a deeper and fuller sound profile. The nylon's soft texture absorbs sound effectively, creating a more subdued bottom-out sound across both models. This consistency in bottom housing material allows users to experience a similar tactile feedback and sound from either switch when pressed. While the top housings introduce a distinct sound signature, the shared nylon bottom completes the acoustic experience and provides a uniformity in feel, allowing both switches to deliver comfort in use.
In essence, the interaction between the top and bottom housings of these switches demonstrates how sound characteristics can be optimized based on material selection. Users seeking a balanced acoustic experience may appreciate the Poro for its deeper tones from a nylon top, while those who prefer a bright, clear output may find satisfaction with the polycarbonate of the Sticky Rice (V2). However, regardless of the differences in top housing materials, the similar nylon bottoms ensure a harmonious blend of tactile response and sound that lends consistency between the two switches. In scenarios where users might switch between the two, they can expect a certain level of familiarity in feel and depth of sound, making both switches appealing for different preferences while maintaining some core similarities.
Weight
When comparing the HMX Poro linear switch to the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) hall effect switch, both options present relatively light actuation and bottom out forces. The Poro switch requires an actuation force of 45 grams and has a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the Sticky Rice (V2) has a slightly lighter actuation force of 40 grams, but shares the same bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that, although the Sticky Rice (V2) feels lighter when first pressed, both switches ultimately provide a similar resistance at the bottom of the stroke. As a result, users looking for a lighter touch might prefer the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) for its lower actuation force, making it ideal for extended typing or gaming sessions. Conversely, those who enjoy a more substantial tactile feedback might appreciate the Poro's slightly heavier feel at the actuation stage, even though both switches bottom out with the same force. Overall, while both options cater to different preferences, the Sticky Rice (V2) offers a marginally lighter experience in terms of actuation.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX Poro linear switch and the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) hall effect switch, there is a slight but notable difference. The Poro boasts a travel distance of 3.7 mm, making it the longer option, while the Sticky Rice (V2) measures at 3.5 mm, showcasing a shorter travel distance. This difference may impact user experience significantly; gamers may appreciate the quicker response time offered by the shorter travel distance of the Sticky Rice switch, while those who prefer a more substantial feel in their keystrokes might lean towards the Poro for its deeper engagement. Therefore, the choice between these switches hinges on personal preference for travel distance and responsiveness during usage.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Poro has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Poro for $2.99.
The Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) has an MSRP of $8.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Sticky Rice (V2) for $6.79.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX Poro linear switch has a satisfyingly poppy and clacky sound profile, which is particularly appealing to those who enjoy a more pronounced audio feedback with their keystrokes. This sound is complemented by an ultra-light actuation force that makes every press feel engaging. In contrast, the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) boasts a neutral sound signature that leans towards the much-desired "thock" associated with more refined mechanical switches. The differences here are notable; the Poro emphasizes a higher-pitched, crisp sound while the Sticky Rice focuses on a deeper, resonant note, catering to distinct preferences among enthusiasts. However, it’s essential to remember that the sound profile can be influenced by the choice of keyboard and keycaps used.
When considering the feel of these switches, the HMX Poro provides a silky smooth keystroke, meticulously lubricated to ensure an effortless glide with every press. This smoothness is paired with an engaging sensation that many typists find incredibly satisfying. On the other hand, the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) delivers a super smooth keystroke as well, attributed to its dustproof stem that minimizes wobble. This attention to detail enhances overall performance and provides a refined tactile sensation, appealing to those who value a well-balanced typing experience. Both switches strive for smoothness, yet they offer differing tactile qualities and sensations that cater to diverse typing styles.
In summary, the HMX Poro linear switch presents a more pronounced, poppy sound and an incredibly smooth typing experience, making it an enticing option for users who appreciate auditory feedback. Meanwhile, the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) combines a deep thock with a refined tactile sensation, prioritized for those who enjoy a more neutral sound profile and reliable performance. While both switches aim for a smooth typing experience, the sound and feel they deliver cater to different preferences, allowing users to choose based on their individual needs. Ultimately, the choice comes down to whether you favor a more playful sound and touch or a classy, understated experience.
Conclusion
To wrap up, when deciding between the HMX Poro linear switch and the Everglide Sticky Rice (V2) hall effect switch, your choice largely hinges on your typing preferences and usage scenarios. If you favor a smooth, effortless typing experience and enjoy a more pronounced sound profile, then the Poro’s meticulously lubricated keystrokes and clacky, poppy sound may be the perfect match. Its light actuation force makes it an excellent option for gamers or typists who type quickly and seek a satisfying auditory feedback. On the other hand, if you lean towards a more refined and balanced experience, the Sticky Rice (V2) is likely the better choice. The neutral sound signature that hints at the desirable "thock" combined with its durable, dustproof stem provides a smooth keystroke while minimizing wobble, appealing to users who appreciate a quieter environment without sacrificing tactile feedback. Ultimately, consider your primary use—whether it’s gaming or typing—and your preference for sound and feel to make the most informed decision for your keyboard setup.
Mentioned in this article
