United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Semi Mute vs. HMX Swift

An in-depth look at the KTT Semi Mute and the HMX Swift switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Semi Mute and the HMX Swift both offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Semi Mute is a linear switch that lives up to its name by providing a noise-free typing experience, making it ideal for those who value a quiet environment and smooth keystrokes. On the other hand, the Swift is also a linear switch but stands out for its deeper sound profile and silky smooth feel, making it a great option for those who enjoy a more tactile typing experience. Both switches have their own strengths and characteristics that make them appealing to different users. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

42g

Bottom-out force

58g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

1.60 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.90 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

15mm spring

Spring

22mm extended spring

Housing materials

Both the KTT Semi Mute and HMX Swift use different materials for their top and bottom housings, with the Semi Mute featuring polycarbonate housing and the Swift featuring nylon housing. The polycarbonate top housing in the Semi Mute creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, while the nylon top housing in the Swift produces a deeper and fuller sound. The polycarbonate bottom housing in the Semi Mute also contributes to a clearer and resonant sound profile, while the nylon bottom housing in the Swift absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound.

Despite the differences in housing materials between the KTT Semi Mute and HMX Swift, their overall performance and sound profiles may be relatively similar. Both switches offer distinct benefits based on the properties of their respective housing materials. The polycarbonate housing in the Semi Mute provides a more clear and resonant sound, while the nylon housing in the Swift offers a deeper and fuller sound. These differences in sound profiles can cater to different preferences, with some users preferring a sharper sound and others preferring a fuller sound experience.

The impact of the housing materials on the sound and feel of the switches is noteworthy, as the top housing influences the sound when a key is released, while the bottom housing affects the sound and feel when a key is pressed down. This differentiation allows for a more nuanced typing experience based on the qualities of each housing material. Whether one prefers the sharper, crisper sound of polycarbonate or the deeper, fuller sound of nylon, both the KTT Semi Mute and HMX Swift offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences in mechanical keyboard switches.

Weight

In comparing the KTT Semi Mute linear switch to the HMX Swift linear switch, we can see that the actuation force of the Semi Mute is slightly higher at 43 grams compared to the Swift's 42 grams. However, the bottom out force of the Semi Mute is also higher at 58 grams, whereas the Swift has a lighter bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that the Semi Mute provides a slightly heavier typing experience overall compared to the Swift. Those who prefer a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the Semi Mute, while those who prefer a lighter touch may prefer the Swift. Both switches offer a medium actuation force, but the Semi Mute is the heavier option when it comes to bottom out force. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences for typing feel and force.

Travel distance

The KTT Semi Mute linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Swift linear switch has a travel distance of 3.9 mm. This means that the Semi Mute has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Swift. The 4.0mm travel distance of the Semi Mute falls within the more traditional range, while the 3.9mm travel distance of the Swift is slightly shorter. Gamers who prefer quicker response times may opt for the Swift with its shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial key press may prefer the Semi Mute with its slightly longer travel distance. Overall, both switches are relatively similar in terms of travel distance, so the difference between the two may not be significant in terms of feel.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Semi Mute has an MSRP of $3.97 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Semi Mute for $3.55.

The HMX Swift has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Swift for $2.99.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT Semi Mute switch is designed to produce a muted and neutral sound profile, offering a quieter typing experience ideal for noise-sensitive environments. On the other hand, the HMX Swift switch is known for its clacky sound, delivering a sharp and snappy key press. Depending on personal preference and the accompanying keyboard and keycaps, both switches offer distinct sound characteristics that cater to different user needs.

When it comes to feel, the KTT Semi Mute switch is described as providing a buttery and mild typing experience, offering smooth and effortless keystrokes with a gentle actuation force. In contrast, the HMX Swift switch is characterized by an easy-to-press and feathery feel, requiring minimal finger exertion and providing a light and springy key press with a creamy sensation. Both switches offer unique tactile feedback and typing experiences, suited to the preferences of users who prioritize specific key feel attributes.

In conclusion, the KTT Semi Mute and HMX Swift switches each bring their own set of subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Semi Mute excels in providing a quieter and more neutral typing experience with a buttery feel, the Swift stands out for its clacky sound profile and easy-to-press, feathery key feel. Depending on individual preferences for sound and key feel, users can choose between the two switches to tailor their mechanical keyboard experience to their liking. Ultimately, both switches can offer a satisfying typing experience, albeit with different auditory and tactile characteristics.

Conclusion

Bringing it all together, when deciding between the KTT Semi Mute linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, consider your priorities and preferences. If you prioritize a noise-free environment and a comfortable typing feel, especially for late-night sessions, the KTT Semi Mute switch with its medium bottom out force of 58 grams may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter actuation force of 50 grams, a silky smooth feel, and a deeper sound profile, the HMX Swift linear switch could be more suitable. Ultimately, your decision should be based on factors such as sound preference, typing feel, and desired actuation force. Choose the switch that aligns best with your typing style and needs for an optimal mechanical keyboard experience.

Mentioned in this article